Independent British Nationalist

So, what's on my mind lately?

2012-02-14T21:35:00.003Z

Meanwhile, back at the ranch......

Well, although it is getting to be a recurring theme, I haven't really had all that much to say lately. This may even be the true underlying reason behind me making the latest video. After all, why write a book when a four minute video conveys it in a nut shell?!

In all honesty though, I suppose am still at a bit of a low ebb with a lot of things at the moment, even to the point of wondering if there is any point keeping this site going.

There are millions of blogs out there and probably a few thousand nationalist ones of various hues and avenues - so why keep open yet another one that hardly gets any views or comments anyway?

Other bloggers seem to be doing a sterling job and have a little bit more energy and drive about them than I do. Durotrigans, for just one example (http://durotrigan.blogspot.com/) where content is updated a few times a week and is always pushing and cajoling its readership to march on.

I know that I should be keeping you riveted and keeping you all encouraged here on this site too, with sparkly and positive news (who knows, this blog entry might yet get better towards the end!), but I suppose that just lately I am a bit tired and have been in need of a mental break.

After all, I have been "on the case" and thinking about all this for over a decade now, even though there is sadly very little I can show for it.....which is an acknowledgement that also tends to get me down a bit!

When it comes to the site here, I have felt that there is nothing I could ever write which will make any real difference in the 'real world' - and when it comes to that real world, I cannot really see any realistic way of getting us out of the mess we are in any more.

It is a bit like a "mad man" with a sandwich board saying the world is going to end, but the passing traffic on the street are not interested, do not really care, cannot see it, nor even understand what you're saying.

They hustle by, in their own lives, with their own "important" issues - so why should they be paying any attention to this or what 'nationalism' has to say?

We are, like it or not, "just another" special interest group along side a host of others. I think we tend to forget that sometimes because we are too caught up in it all and too caring (if that is possible) about what happens to us and everybody else of our kith and kin around us - even some of the worst dregs of society.

Lately, with the fracture and re-fracture of nationalism, I am starting to think that most of our scattered endeavours under multiple guises, are, to be quite frank, increasingly grasping at straws in desperation at our situation - and are often things being done by us nationalists as a cathartic release of our frustration more than anything else.

We desperately want to feel like we are doing something, going somewhere, that we have found ourselves a way forward which will take off like a rocket and cut through the choking liberal air like a supersonic jet. Perhaps that will indeed come.

Perhaps having the belief, the drive, the excitement to believe this is exactly what we need in order to actually make it happen - but I cannot say I am in a good position to help with that right now.

I am conscious of that, and therefore I know that I ideally need to be positive, hopeful, encouraging, looking for the best in everything and looking forward to the future.....but what can I say? I am pretty depressed.

Maybe in a week or two or a month or two when winter has ended I will be more bright eyed and bushy tailed. Winter nights, cold weather, nationalism in a poor state, me having to live in a town already 35% or so "enriched" and alienating - it all builds up.

I am sure we all get down in the dumps over our situation from time to time and I am not going to be much different from anybody else.

One thing which is positive, is that there seems to be a more coherent (and even 'panicky') commentary going on in various pockets of society.

People are starting to realise, more than ever, that something is going seriously wrong and when it comes to matters of immigration, multiculturalism, race, religion etc things are getting much more open than they were when I first started - despite all the media brouhaha about 'racism in football' and all that kind of nonsense that tries to clamp the lid down.

It feels like the mood is ripening for a complete change of some sort, but I cannot be sure what form or direction it will take. It may even go the opposite way to nationalism, and usher in more communism or whatever else (like extending 'bash the bankers', 'occupy x-street', 'stop austerity cuts' etc).

It feel like things are ever quickly coming to a head though - with the Euro, the EU, the economy, jobs, mass immigration, concerns over "integration" because people are finally starting to realise that the numbers coming have been immense. It seems like it cannot last all that much longer in its present form.

Regarding the nationalist culture, I know that I have also been a bit disdainful and condemning of various things lately, but maybe the thing that is really at the absolute root of it all is that awful gnawing feeling of futility.

Perhaps this is an unintended consequence of my latest video - it may make people feel the tsunami is too great to survive. Well, perhaps it is. The real intention of it though, is to shake people up and make them appreciate the urgency.

Even if it stops a few people from cowering away when difficult matters come up, and encourages them to openly take part in some basic verbal jujitsu against the dogmas of the prevailing norms, it would be a start.

Maybe this sense of looming futility is why I have struggled to believe in certain platforms, methodologies, approaches, tones (such as Britain First etc). I have possibly stopped believing in how they can help or how they could ever make a real change.

I know that I need to get back on the horse and stop being such a ney-sayer, but I'm not finding it too easy at the moment.

I need to remember that it is not over until it is truly over - and that it just feels like it is. In the meantime (to the warbling of the fat lady), we have to carry on if we can, if only to salvage something from the wreckage of the worst case scenario.

Remembering that we are, in effect, just another jostling special interest group with a sandwich board, I still feel that it is important we do our best to get the discourse right and grab peoples attention for the right reasons instead of the wrong ones.

When it comes to that general discourse, my own position and method of presentation has always attempted to be clean and articulate. I may not always be a good example, but I have always aimed to be.

I have long been a stickler for desiring good language, proper discussion, giving deeper explanations of ourselves and attempting to win people over and thus win arguments. It takes time, it takes effort, but I have always thought it worthwhile.

This is perhaps why I get so dismayed when I have seen various sites being brutish, base-level, rash, brash, short-fused, virtually sticking pins in peoples eyes via the way they can jab the material and discourse out at times. Not always, but at times. It is not just one, but a handful, including forums and social media networks.

I have never really liked it or ever thought it was good for the cause as a whole. It is a foible of mine, I suppose. I think it keeps us penned in, niche and preaching to the converted rather than reaching out and reaching into peoples hearts and minds. Who are our real targets? Ourselves, or the fence sitters who are a bit dubious about us? That's all I am suggesting we bear in mind.

I intend to try and do an article on this later in the month in order to give a few contrasting examples, not least in the aim of showing that I am not "against" individuals or knocking them, but that I am instead seeking to 'raise the game' slightly (as I see it) in any way we can.

I have been condemning, but I have probably not been properly explaining to people where my point of view comes from on this. It is the easiest thing in the world to pick apart everything and everybody else, so perhaps (if I can muster it) I should try and learn to lead by example or give out a few more examples rather than just sticking the boot in.

The brasher approach is perhaps good for the existing troops (in order for them to be reinforced and otherwise bolstered with tough talk and "no nonsense" ways) but in my view it is no good for assembling the wider army of fellow travellers we so desperately need.

It is a tricky balance to get right though. We need to keep the troops on board and entertained but we also need to bring in people and make them appreciate the underlying concepts our points.

We all have our moments too, myself included. The new video I made called "Britian Ain't Seen Nothin Yet" (for example) is hardly a den of cool, calm and calculated material to win over the public.

It is a bit "in your face", pretty "extreme" (as in taking it to extremes) and whatever else - but at least I am self aware enough to recognise this fact whereas others may not be so self aware, or have simply ceased to care how we look or sound because they are past the end of the tether themselves. It is understandable, I suppose.

The extra sniping and muck raking that has been going on (from all sides) in recent months as various groups compete for the prize of "winner takes all" (from the downward turn of the BNP) has also reminded me of the murky, mucky, creepy, cliquey and nasty side to the nationalist culture which I have long itched for us all to get away from.

Again, this is something I have always sought to avoid getting into as it is something that turns me right off our cause and it is also one of the things that turns me off making more of an effort to get involved.

Sometimes, I have a hard enough time being firm enough in my views and convictions without all this going on (seeing like we are often akin to Salmon swimming up rivers and waterfalls whilst the other people around us slip down stream), without feeling like I am with a bunch of complete idiots or standing alongside campaigns and events I cannot really side with or think are futile.

I suppose I have to remember that we have to work with what we have and that all groups and causes have their similar problems. It does not stop me wishing it could be different though, for I have always been a bit of an idealist and a dreamer.

In light of all this turmoil that has been going on, I have stood back a few steps and taken a good long look at us all, at myself, regarding how we act, how we think, how we behave and how we tend to promote our concerns.

I think it is important we do this from time to time in order to assess and reassess ourselves, otherwise, we can exist in a bubble and we can lose contact with reality as everybody else around us sees it (and lose contact of how they may see us).

Whilst I have done this stepping back, I have come to see a bit of a closed loop network, a closed circuit that slowly digests itself into laa-laa land at times due to lack of fresh feedback from the outside world - something which we need to keep us grounded and 'in check' in order to be able to reach to them.

This closed loop networking is done whilst we simultaneously cage ourselves in to our self made prisons - which we sometimes do not seem able or even willing to escape from because it suits us to be "in on it" rather than working outside of it.

Also, we can tend to be a bit knee-jerk. I am a victim of it myself too, even on some low levels.

For example, key words, small events on the TV, radio or in the paper set me off. I only need to see certain politicians on the news and I am already catching myself saying "get off, you bloody scum bag" and closing my ears to what they are even saying. It is not good, really.

Recently, in part of a general conversation with colleagues on the way to visit a customer, I was asked by my employer about this competition or something he had seen related to coming up with a poster slogan for the London Olympics.

He said it had to start with something like "Come to London........." - and without even thinking, in a split second, I barbed "Come to London, every bugger else has!". There was clearly a bit of venom in my cynical bark.

It was not really necessary, and it was pretty clear what I meant by it, but this is how it gets you thinking all the time. You get to be on complete autopilot, single minded, boxed in.

Did my comment win them over, explain my views articulately......no, not really. And this is the danger. We are soon back to being the "sandwich board" man, so easily.

Perhaps it is just a result of information overload and perhaps I just cannot take it any more at the moment because I need a break, but right now, right this minute, I have to say I am getting pretty tired of it all.

I am sick and tired of thinking about it, reading about it, seeing it, hearing it, spotting the processes of it, living it, dreaming it, trying to navigate it on decent terms, weighing up the pros and cons of different routes and models, groups, sites, people, issues, strategies, ideologies - and on and on it goes.

It does not help that I see no particular way forward which makes complete sense.

I could easily run all the options down into the ground, including BNPideas (which are probably my current standpoint 'home' at the moment) - but instead of doing that, I will concentrate on a general picture of what different things may have to offer, albeit in isolation.

In a very quick run down then, here is a potential 'dream team' style fantasy mixture of some of the things clanging around at the moment. It is by no means well thought through, it is just a cursory glance at some of their superficial strengths as I see them.

Self promotion, non-political activism, campaigns, fund raising, organisation skills, call centres, print publications, leaflet design and distributions, etc: Britain First.

Ideological and traditional clean cut British Nationalism, actual policies, "intellectuals", representatives, experienced nationalists, activists and councillors to move traditional British Nationalism into a new league beyond the tinpot and barmy back-room-brawl culture of yesteryear: BNPideas.

Public frontage for a party platform - as in, website style, approach with the public, general sheen and shine and explanations of "general" points of view (ignoring ideological differences and personalities issues people may have!) - British Freedom Party. Whatever else may be going on with them, I do think they have a good website and a good overall tone which is more conducive to the wider public's ear in terms of the "politics model" they stand on.

Street presence and 'back up' against opponents - for those times when we need physical feet on the ground for spasmodic events to show we are not to be walked over by either the left, the government or Islamist groups: EDL. They have commanded the streets and taken it back from the dominance of the left. That was quite a feat, and they have done it, in my opinion. Well done to them for managing to draw that kind of 'live' physical support on a repeated basis.

Think-tanks, charity groups, NGO's etc: Well, there are none I am deeply aware of. Therefore I think we do need to have some of these, or, at the least, do more to use the tools we already have provided to us by others (such as Migration Watch). We don't want to link with them, but I bet not all that many of us support/contribute to them because we see them as sell-outs. In the absence of much else, we should perhaps be making the best of them.

Reasserting of our individual rights as citizens, attempting to keep the state off our all our backs (whatever political stripe or viewpoint), providing an alternative society to retreat to (and potentially become dominant): Lawful Rebellion, Lawful Bank, BCG. Although it is a bit quirky, it is trying to establish a general counter-culture to release us from certain talon like grips.

There are probably many other groups and many other roles too. I won't go into them all, there isn't enough time.

The thing is though that all of them seem to have gaping holes in them - and none of them really gel together or are even really all that molecularly capable of doing so.

They are ideologically different, strategically different, organisationally different and in most cases they are not willing (or wishing) to formally associate with each other. Nor is it really wise or mutually beneficial for many of them to openly do so.

So we are scattered to the four winds.....and around and around it all goes. I could go into great lengths of text on why this mutual and molecular incompatibility is the case (and what all the flaws are) but this article is long enough already.

The bullet points above are probably the kinds of things that we need as a whole, but no single entity provides it all - and the disjointed nature of all the present entities prevents a single strike being struck against the forge that bonds us all into this nightmare.

What we can try and do though, I suppose, is remember what 'model' is best suited for a particular task and for us to then apply ourselves appropriately. It would be even better if we can bounce off each other in a more coordinated and well timed fashion.

I know I am stating the obvious but; If you believe in street activism, then see how best that can be done and when it is most suitable. Get more professional, study it, get it right, get it more supportive by middle classes if need be (if that is even a problem, and not just an imagined stereotype from the press!), become seen as the 'goodies' somehow rather than (thanks to the media) the baddies.

How can this be done? I don't know, as it is not my thing. I am not really that "well up" on the EDL any more either (for example) or what they are doing, but I hope they are asking themselves those kinds of questions.

If you believe in campaigning and petitions, then why not study and discover the best ways to get results and actually dig deep into what is actually feasible to achieve in the system you aim to use?!

Why not discover the 'structure' of the current system and plan what you need in order to break it down to get bigger things done, and then do them in order. Ad-hoc and knee-jerk is surely not a good way of doing it, nor are pie in the sky types of causes that 'feel good' but stand less than a snowball in hells chance of growing legs and crossing the finish line.

If you believe in party politics, then why not see what disciplines you need, what type of people you need, etc. It can be a science. Are we making it up as we go along, or are there people within Nationalism who are professional strategists and political studiers? I have no idea either way.

What kinds of people do we need to explain our principles and policies of how our views would work?

Do they look like and sound like competent politicians that people can trust their vote with? Have they got answers on how to gradually switch to their system from the one around us now?

Have they got answers to local, national and global affairs throughout the political spectrum of the manifesto?

All of the above things are all different disciplines which all need different skill bases. We tend to knock lumps out ourselves because no one person or one group is right or suitable for everything all the time.

This 'remembering our function' is something I feel many sites have failed to do since the times when we were more commonly united under the British National Party, and even before that time I suppose! - ie, remembering that it was a party, with a manifesto to sell and to promote the virtues of.

Instead, we have often tended to abandon the manifesto and the sell of why we think we are right and justified - in order to concentrate on a few niche issues which are - obviously to us - the most pressing and prominent, but, in terms of a "political party model", a bit of a failure in the whole.

Other parties sell their wares, keynote their manifesto positions, talk policy and positions in the hope of gaining support. Not ours, not in 'nationalism' lol. We tend to focus on three or four things. Race, Immigration, Islam, Zionism, NWO. The rest often goes out the window.

Perhaps for good reason, I agree (as fishing quotas, road ditches or pet licensing or whatever are none-priority issue in the bigger scheme of things!) - but, for the "party model" it is perhaps not a great idea to be going on about shadowy Zionist Jew Cabals or "Muslim scum breeding like rabbits" all the time and ignoring the manifesto of the party we have claimed to support.

We don't have to ignore the 'usual suspects' that drive us, but we should just bear in mind the 'model' that we aim to work within and then carefully frame it accordingly. There are ways and means.

The core things we focus our attentions on is probably what nationalism is about - but there is a schism between that side of things and how we deal with it. Much like how you can deal with globalism and the 'new world order' issues without necessarily going on about the all seeing eye symbol, assassinations of JFK and others, the 9/11 subject, or the Zionist Jews.

I may be being very naive, but I think you can deal with some of those issues and promote nationalist ideas and concepts directly from the use of the current BNP manifesto. That is why it is there, contained within it are positions and policies that defend this nation and our societies from the processes of globalism.

We should perhaps be promoting the virtues and values of these things rather than concentrating on convoluted theories, events, historical events, who we believe to be behind it all, etc, all the time.

If you want to go further and get into media control or banking corruption, communitarianism, corporate fascism and cultural Marxism, or whatever else, then again, I think they can be brought up and dealt with in other ways than we often do.

In this schism regard, we tend to live in a world that is outside the comprehension and understanding of others - and we then fail to understand why we never really did all that well outside of our bubble.

It was only in recent years we started to market and sell ourselves properly in the British National Party, and the BNPideas splinter site is probably closest to it that we have when it comes to extending that kind of approach right now.

It is itself not without flaws and a culture of its own, but the BNPideas site can bring nationalism into the reach of the common thinking man whilst not conforming to the mainstream system either.

It often highlights the dubious positions of the opposition, taking back the arguments and the moral high-grounds from the liberal-left and unashamedly laying out that premise of ethnic self defence too at the same time. It is a role it does pretty well.

This 'winning the high ground' is the right strategy to win support, in my view.

Not only is it challenging the bad system around us (which is promoted by all the other parties) but in this time of a leftist-cultural-political-hegemony, it is using their own platform and society against them.

Why not tell them the river is flowing upstream, so they become a salmon too rather than a perch?

On a low level, even David Cameron seems to have sussed that one out, discussing their actions in terms of "fairness" and "equality" and "what is right and proper" from a supposedly "caring and liberal" point of view.

Society is so pumped full of liberal left-wing attitudes and the need to feel warm and fuzzy and righteous, that I think it is potentially more easier to turn those tables by out-lefting the left and stealing that self righteousness back (but with our own policies and principles), rather than sticking our ski's in the slope in defiance and expecting them to shield us from the avalanche rumbling down the hillside.

Look what is going on in this country: Human trafficking, slave labour, suppression of wages, drug dealing gangs, FGM, poor education prospects for poor white youths........the list of liberal "progressive" caused disasters are too numerous to mention.

So, for our "output" style, what is better?:

(1) "Our country is being flooded by criminal immigrant scum and drug dealers who need to be hung, labour communists are flooding us with Muslims and chaos, and it is happening because Zionist Ashkenazi cabals are conspiring against us all for world domination" (Okay, I am being a bit flippant in order to make a point, but I just mean the usual kinds of tirade that can be seen bursting from the machine gun, lol).

or:

(2) "Current policies and viewpoints of the left are resulting in misery for hundreds of thousands of women, bringing both crime and slavery to this country, also depressing our wages. The soft approaches to immigration, drugs and drug culture is wrecking the lives of millions of people. We need to eradicate this scourge on society for the benefit of families, communities and the well being of our nation"

Whilst (1) is possibly good for Nationalists and strengthening the feeling we already have, (2) is turning the tables on the prevailing leftist actions and in my opinion 'out-lefts' the left and would win us more support and understanding - because people want to feel that they are doing the right thing and heading towards a better future etc.

They both deal with the same issues, but are approaching them in completely different ways.

We nationalists, I hope, are here for a reason. We are good people (in the whole!) who have good reasons for our positions and standpoints, not only on ethnicity and such, but self sufficiency, sovereignty, promoting decency and standards, etc.

We do not tend sell them though....We are often too busy concentrating on the worst things, the reaction, being bitter and angry and condemning.

It is understandable. We are the ones who already know what is going on and what we believe is coming down the tracks, but we have to remember that others do not appreciate our positions or understand our positions clearly.

Are we making ourselves understood? - Or with our discourse are we alienating people from why we are bitter and angry and why we think it matters so much in the first place?

This is where I tend to think we need to get the balance back and remember what our platforms are ideally best used for: Explanation, support and recruitment.

New Video - You Aint Seen Nothin' Yet

2012-02-10T17:02:00.011Z

This is a new little video which I put together the other day, set to the song and tune of Bachman Turner Overdrive 'You Aint Seen Nothin' Yet".

Whilst I acknowledge it is a bit crude and extreme in its position (and therefore not particularly designed as a recruiting tool!), it reflects what has been on my mind in the last week or so from within the bubble of that mad-thinking nationalist world we tend to live in at times.

It is intended to be a little bit humorous in parts, in a kind of tragic and mocking way - but the fundamental message itself is of course a serious matter. The video description text on YT explains a little more.

Thanks for watching.

More Musings on Recent Internal Affairs

2012-01-20T18:17:00.003Z

This is in relation to Andrew Brons' latest article on the BNPideas website (http://bnpideas.com/?p=3519) and some of the silly factional sniping that has been taking place.

The BNPideas site had been static for a week or so, inevitably prompting more derision and indeed, also some genuine concern about it too.

It has been back up though in the last few days, although it is obvious that much of the moderating work is falling onto one or possibly two sets of shoulders who have their own lives to attend to and cannot always devote so much of their time to such a thankless task.......

It is good to see that the site is back to life, and perhaps even better to see a well articulated and well measured article from Andrew.

It certainly chimes with me in regard to some of the issues currently going on, and it also subtly deals (in what I feel is an appropriate manner) with some elements of the movement whose sole purpose of late seems to be oriented around keeping us all fighting, disillusioned and to generally help maintain the very kind of discourse that has long been of detriment to us ever breaking out of the fringes.

Regarding the reverse snobbery aspect, it is a shame that people have had to resort to such attitudes in their attack pieces - and Andrew is not alone in picking up on it. In my view, the BNPideas website has certainly not instigated or sought to cause such divisions, and it is the others who I believe have taken it upon themselves to make remarks about 'intellectuals', 'toffs', 'oiks' etc.

Although I may well risk exacerbating the issue here, I will say that in light of this kind of behaviour I think Andrew and the BNPideas team tend to handle this well and are indeed a 'class above' the others in terms of their opponents' rather belligerent approaches and bullying tones at times - which is probably the precise reason why I frequent BNPideas and no longer go somewhere else at the moment.

I have no axe to grind with anybody and I have no desire for animosity between nationalists (and never have had), but all I can say is that it has left me very disillusioned, disappointed and very self reflective of our whole movement in my 'time out' period. People seem to be losing the plot and unable to see that they are doing so.

I do not know how to move forward either, especially when we are being put in those kinds of circumstances between ourselves (on top of the rest of our problems). Things are in an awful mess at the moment, with no particular option or pathway seeming all that viable on its own. Things may develop on different fronts, but nothing is really grabbing me or my attention lately.

It is ironic that there is commentary orientated around BNPideas being snubbed and also them doing the snubbing, whilst certain quarters make it extremely difficult to ever extend that hand of friendship as they drive wedge after wedge into the atmosphere whilst simultaneously offering that supposed olive branch for us all "to see sense".

For them, it seems to be a case of 'do it our way' 'or else you are 'morons' and 'time wasters' etc, even when 'their way' is not necessarily the right one, not the right tone or atmosphere, or something that many of us believe in as a full solution. It is all very well being "active" - but if you are being active doing entirely the wrong things just for the sake of "feeling good" that *something* is "being done" - then it is potentially just as pointless as doing nothing at all.

Things may well mature and develop, but at the moment, I am just not "feeling it" when it comes to other avenues and their vision / modus operandi - whether that be EDL supporting elements, campaign groups, micro-parties etc. I have nothing against any individual who behaves in an appropriate manner to other nationalists, and I have no interest in making accusations or repeating rumours and smears that tend to go around about people. All that kind of thing is rather tasteless to me.

I also notice that some people here and elsewhere seem to want some kind of (monumental style, I gather) 'leader' on some kind of new magic horse to save the day (and are swiping at Andrew for not being such a figure or being interested taking up such a role) - but perhaps we do not really need a 'leader' at all and maybe there is no magic horse, and the closest thing we ever had to one was an old nag which has been shot in the foot by its perceived 'owner'.

What we might need is a notable representative and figurehead - but not a new Mosely, Tyndall or Griffin type entity to "rally" behind, if that is what some are imagining, ie those who give rousing orations and all the other stuff which may look good to us but has thus far sent us nowhere but into a separate entity from wider society - and into a cliquey club for us to chat to each other within.

Perhaps the whole 'mighty leader figure' expectation is rather a flawed model to adhere to in these times anyway, for such people are extremely hard to find - and when they do come along there is a temptation to expect 'them' (and the 'entity' of the vehicle they represent) to be our national salvation - rather than all of us acting together as pieces of a wider counter-culture machine.

Going from the history of nationalism and nationalists, there is probably not ever going to be a 'one size fits all' solution - and views/directions are also too divergent to ever have us see eye to eye at all times. It is perhaps time we just accepted this and try and converge as much as is mutually possible. If it leads to something more unified, all the better. What we need is a strategy plan and some instruction on what to be doing with ourselves. Then we may know where we are best suited.

It does not seem (to me) to be a 'simple' case of finding ourselves a representative, providing them with a shiny new vehicle to drive and everything will be hunky-dory - we have to think about the feasibility of ALL our planned actions, objectives and potential aspirations before we make a start doing anything half baked.

For example, is participating in elections still wise? If it does serve a purpose in some way (outside of the fantasy ideas of gaining scores of MP's, and I think it does have some ulterior purpose to some degree), how is it best gone about and best articulated in order to serve that particular precise purpose?

How could extra-party issues and activism happen? What combination of these models do we need to mesh together, and what should their individual focus and roles be (that would ultimately compliment each other rather than fight each other)?

How can the types of people who "can" get things moving in any of these activities be kick-started so that others who are not as forthright or capable can lend support to them, either time-wise, financially, practically? (Whether that be inside of politics or outside of it).

How does the true ground lay outside of the nationalist fantasy land bubble (that has increasingly become such a "closed loop network" to that of wider 'normal society' since the peak we were riding a few years ago?). Where is our place?

When was the last time we seriously studied actual strategies and facts about their working viability? Perhaps time has moved on and we are sticking with an old tactic or three, all of which are a ride into nowhere, especially when on their own and in isolation?

How can the system around us be attacked to our precise advantage piece by piece? What are the weak points? What is the strategy we need in order to move or overcome our obstacles one at a time, preferably in some well planned consecutive order?

Shouldn't we be investigating those kinds of things rather than blindly pinning ourselves with various rosettes or waging pointless campaigns just in order to just feel good about ourselves and make pretend that it is making a scrap of difference in the long haul?

How can we find a voice and following again? We have lost the upward momentum as a whole 'cultural movement' in this society. That is how it feels to me. We have to get it back, and it needs various fronts and various faces each playing their role that they are best suited for -whether they be "intellectual toffs" or "oiks" or anywhere in between.

Yet, when I look around at the whole "culture" of nationalism it is FAR from enticing or healthy - so why on Earth are we expecting *new* people to support us and get involved in this poisonous and polluted atmosphere? Not only are we alienating ourselves with the 'wider countrymen' but also between ourselves as well.

It has its own language, often accompanied by a harsh and alienating rhetoric, some far flung paranoia that people may not even begin to understand, etc, all of which can be a huge turn off and the very opposite of a recruitment drive.

If you step back for a while and then look back in as a 'new-comer', I think the atmosphere and culture of nationalism itself generally stinks to high heaven, and is certainly so if the internet is any impression that people may go off, what with BDF and all other such things that keep us hemmed into the same vicious cycles.

Those are the things going around my mind at the moment - not necessarily any pining for a new party model to appear that will carry forth the BNP, or having us scratching around for a new national "leader" (of some future historical significance or magnitude) and carrying on blindly just the same as before.

If we are going to break free and do something, it is important we do the right thing, not just the expedient thing or something for the sheer sake of answering critics and their persistent badgering that seems purely designed to plug their own chosen solutions.

I do not have the necessary experience or insight into these matters, but at least if we are going to be seen to be 'sitting around' with our head in our hands wondering what the hell we are going to do, then it should be time well spent to actually think differently and figure out how we can actually make a few real dents in paving a better future for ourselves.

This includes (in the short to medium term) taking a long look at ourselves as a movement and an ideology and how we are potentially hampering our own progress and failing to sell ourselves and our argument (including the thorniest of things).

People sometimes mock this BNPideas site and mock Andrews' position in the European Parliament, but at least I know that I can point people to the BNPideas site for a more healthier and well presented argument which they are more likely to side with. Surely this is our primary purpose if we seek understanding, backing, and wider support?!

Andrew has also managed to 'turn the tables' of 'self righteousness' on some of the EUrocrats at the highest levels, and I feel that this is an important activity and a strategy which needs to be more seen by the wider public, that they are fighting a good fight, and if nothing else, I also feel that it helps give us the kind of skills and such which should be being brought back to local politics and local issues too. Yes, they do not care in the EU, but our being there has not been a complete waste of time in terms of our own structural advantage or status. Failing to harness it and roll it out throughout the movement is perhaps the failure.

People also have to trust that we have competent people and experienced people - and this has been part of our movements growth, for we have not had or held onto positions like these before. We need a certain amount of "intellectuals" and proven councillors and such to be trusted as competent, knowledgeable, thoughtful and capable of dealing with the worlds complexities and localised issues. Mocking and attacking such people - people that we have long needed as representatives of a nationalist party - is surely an ill judged activity.

Marine Le Pen often seems to "show up" her rivals on both the "left" and the "right" - and we need to work that kind of floor in order to garner the same kinds of support. The old parties time is dead, they are both old and failed models now. Something else is ripe for bursting through - but unfortunately it does not seem to be us doing the bursting.

However, that 'thinking' time is not endless. I can understand the sense of immediacy and frustration as our nation slips irreversibly down the plug hole. Situations evolve, there is always going to be 'something or other' coming around the corner to cling on for.

Everybody not already involved with other groups are probably wondering what to do with themselves and probably wondering how feasible it is to ever 'get back out there' and regain a semblance of a following amongst the wider public. I am only guessing of course, for I am not on the front line and never really have been to any serious degree. Others who are more on the front line may be able to inform me much better than my speculations.

I would not class myself as a "proper hands on activist" any more - and to be quite honest, with the way things are at the moment I am sick to death of 'nationalism' and thinking about nationalism, to the point where I have almost had enough of it all and could easily not give a fig what happens any more.

That said, being awoken to nationalism has changed my life and I will still aim to lend general support in the future (even if it just financially) if and when the right kinds of scenarios come along, when I can feel justified and fully behind something that is on the right track.

I am not currently comfortable with any particular manifestation of nationalism on offer, but the bluster, bile, bad atmospheres and approaches (which I cannot feel comfortable supporting or lending my allegiances to) are certainly not encouraging me to continue (or to align with other avenues than this one here at BNPideas).

If that is my feeling as a 'nationalist', then what on Earth must 'prospective-nationalists' be thinking when they come across our sphere of interest? My recent experiences of "online nationalism" (for what that is worth!) leaves me feeling that we are going back towards being a million miles away from their vantage points.

We are at risk of losing our way and walking back (further) to the wilderness.

Nationalist Culture: Our greatest problem?

2012-01-01T19:42:00.008Z

Does nationalist culture reflect well?

Over the last few months, I have been looking around at 'Nationalism' and taking a bit more notice of the culture within it than I usually do, particularly on some of my more regularly visited sites.

In the process, I have been increasingly getting dismayed at what I have been seeing. When this is coupled to the general state of affairs, it cannot help but reinforce the feeling that we are finished as a nation and as a people.

I wish it was not true, but it seems that we are just not able to step out of the murky waters and snap out of the cocooned nature which envelops us as a people and as 'Nationalists'. People seem unable to step back and have a good look at ourselves and some of our output.

I do not exclude myself from this, for we all tend to bring the same formulaic things to the table, but I have more specific dynamics and examples in mind.

The antics have become all too predictable. Like a pantomime you have seen 5 times, you can get to the point where you just know what is going to happen next and can even mouth the words. This goes for each end of the nationalist spectrum.

The 'less intellectual' side tend to mire themselves in absurd paranoia and crude discourse that alienates the very people they rail against as being "sheeple" - whilst savaging the 'intellectuals' as being 'arrogant' because they themselves are perhaps too impatient, unable to grasp some of their concepts or too belligerently blinkered to see what damage they are potentially causing with their own activities sometimes.

The more intellectual side tend to mire themselves in lofty discourse and longer term plans based on sound strategies and understanding of the mechanics of society, but fail to bring the former group along with them, who they need because many of the more 'intellectual' sorts (perhaps like myself?) are often not up to the task of being out there directly in the thick of it and making it work.

This is where the split comes in, and always seems to have done. I feel that this split is getting wider than ever. It is not good.

Sure, the 'intellectual' types can be good representatives, be the sorts to go on the TV and run rings around some of the media darlings.

They can often construct sound policies and articulate the points of Nationalism better than your average activist or supporter. They can be in offices and parliaments putting over our cause, showing a good front and look after all that kind of thing in a way people expect professionals to be like, sound like and act like.

But as can be seen at the other side of the spectrum - such as some situations which were shown on the documentary 'Battle For Barking' - they would probably not cope well at all when being surrounded by 15 angry black youths who are looking to smash up both your stall and your face in the middle of London somewhere.

Knowing about socio-political geography of the Ukraine during Stalin's reign or the mechanics of instigating protectionist economics (or whatever) is going to be no help at all in those kinds of scenarios! People like that often have no idea of how to diffuse a situation, or deal with these people on their level or in their language.

Nor does their lofty intellectual verbiage and 'points of principle' always resonate with the average voter/supporter - who probably cares little for that 'guff' and just wants to know the basics of why they should support the cause or 'the party' (whichever one it may be) and why it is in their own personal interest.

I am certainly not suggesting that people who can undertake more 'real world' activities are not knowledgeable or that they are unintelligent. We all come in different packages that span the spectrum.

All I am suggesting is that different people are cut out for different roles, just like wider life itself.

You would not get a plumber to fix your car, or a mechanic to install your toilet system. One is not "better" than the other but they do suit different situations.

From the looks of it, you would not expect an Emma West like representative to cut down Paxman on the BBC or cut down Barroso in the EU parliament, and you would not expect a (near elderly) posh talking stuffy suit to be knocking seven bells out of some mouthy black youths kicking off on the table-top stall in self defence.

Some people may 'love' Emma West style situations and think she is marvellous and say how she 'resonates' with people they know and speak to. If that can be used to our nationalist advantage by those people, then so be it, they are capable of harnessing that group. Target it at that group, and not the groups which would not share the view.

Others may be more disgusted by Emma West's actions (even though they fully support her right to say it unaccosted and support the sentiment which truly lay behind the situation) but they may be very impressed by a good performance discussing economics and societal relations on BBC Newsnight, which the non-politicos would probably not even be watching.

After watching it, they may be convinced that Nationalism relates to their own beliefs and be won over by the strength of argument and rationale. They may want to visit a site which expands further on that point or expands further on other aspects to what we have to say as a whole.

Yet, what do they get if they go to some sites which many see to be part of the nationalist core? What can be in the main pieces or in the comment sections?

"Is that Miller-band a Paki? He looks like one to me"....."Paki scum will one day go back or be buried in pigs excrement"....."Fake Ashkenazi Jew Cameron"...."Muslim cancer scum are breeding like rabbits ready for Jihad"...."The Zionist Jews and enslaving Rothschilds are doing what they did in 1793 when one of them said...." .....etc. etc.

When it is not that, it can sometimes be muck raking, division, hostility, paranoia, infighting. Smearing good men whilst being silent on some of the real rotten eggs or things outside of our bubble. Squabbles on sites notorious for being filled with "reds" and hours and hours spent on line on these forums engaging with people who have no intention of being persuaded.

Step back from it, look around, then look back in again at it - surely the culture of all this is pretty crazy and damaging as a whole.

Leaving that aside, and getting back to the "horses for courses", this is why there is no "one size fits all" situation that people hope for in our cause. This is in general - as a wider thing - and also within the same branches of one entity.

You cannot expect a nationalist graphic designer to also, automatically, be a good orator, an organiser and motivator - nor can you expect a good organiser and communicator to also be good at graphic design.

Somebody who may be great at organising and motivating may be clueless with money management and fund raising, and somebody good at fund-raising and book keeping may be useless as fomenting workable plans and devising policy.

Some people are experts and very comfortable dealing with the public. They may thrive on it, enjoy the questions, the verbal jousting, winning the point or gracefully agreeing to disagree.

Other people may have tremendous fear of speaking to and approaching people who they do not know - and are much better suited doing whatever else it is they can do to help.

An "intellectual" may be better at lugging the cases, folding up the leaflets, bundling up the leaflets into packages, and doing the 'menial' and time consuming work than their counterparts - who are perhaps much more competent and good "out in the field" at the coal face on the street.

It is a game of two halves, it is not a case of "lowly" and "highly" - it is knowing where one can be best used; knowing our weaknesses and strengths and having an avenue to pursue that best role for the advancement of the cause.

Others may be good use completely outside of politics and activism. They may be good community leaders, they may be influential supporters and financial backers.

They may be able to get community centres established for the fostering of a white society and consciousness in their area. They may be teachers who are able to help with 'home schooling' schemes and setting up 'free schools' for those who do not want state indoctrination for their children. They may be into technology and able to provide free or cheap second hand goods to the cause to save us money. The list is extensive.

This is what Nationalism is about too - not just demonstrations, stalls, campaigns, party politics.

How many people are we wasting, letting waste away doing nothing, because they are isolated and have no roll to fill?

I know I have been one of them, and have generally been so since I awoke to the cause!

In the past, I have tended a stall for an hour or so with others, travelled to different places and done a couple hours of leafleting here and there, I have been to meetings, folded up thousands of leaflets ready for the mailboxes, been a guest at the election 'counting' halls for the party to overlook and check no funny business is going on with the votes.

I have been "active" with all that sort of thing. A general waif and stray, blowing around the periphery to see how things went.

Could I be a regional organiser? Do I have what it takes? Could I interact with the public with a stutter and fear of speaking? Could I phone around peoples houses and get them out for a day's action? Could I be a councillor or a community leader?

No. In all honesty I could not, because of my nature. I know this. I do not delude myself. I cannot be anybody else but myself, and I do not pretend to be anything otherwise either.

Could I be an article writer, a leaflet designer, proof checker, video editor, etc on a mid-level basis? Could I help with those menial tasks, preparations, sound systems, etc. Yes, I think I could.

I did offer, on more than one occasion, to see where I could be put within the British National Party - but of course, I was ignored. Not even a 'thanks but no thanks' came back my way.

Even then, when I was doing something 'active' for the party, I was often very uncomfortable with it. It was hand-to-mouth all the time, ill prepared, ad-hoc, 'make do and mend' - and in some cases a complete "no show" by the party after being sat around waiting for hours.

It was a shambles. A disillusioning shambles. It made you feel like saying they can stick your support up their backside because it was a circus act. I stopped even bothering going along to anything in the end.

It was on occasion even embarrassing, with various stunts going on and attitudes and banners which I could not explain or defend. It "was not for me" at all on those occasions, and at times I wondered what the hell I was doing there along side it.

If anybody was to ask me now, I would probably say "No, I am not getting involved". I am losing faith and all enthusiasm to keep wasting my life.

After once being eager, in the process of picking up nationalism, being 'charged' and righteous in my views and prime for being part of the machine, now, many years later, it is getting time for me to knock it all on the head, especially when I look around at what manifests itself as Nationalism and the lack of critical thought within it.

Some sites cannot grasp how childish and foolish they are being at times, or what may be 'wrong' with their whole approach and tone of content. "Do you see what is wrong with the site, or the article, or the position?" - "No" comes the reply. Okay then, that just reinforces my suspicions.

The folks pushing some groups and sites like to repeat the word "toxic" to reinforce their own "cleanliness" and batter down their rivals. This is toxic, that is toxic, so and so is toxic, and so on.

But the truth is that the whole "atmosphere" of nationalism itself is the toxic waste ground where nothing good will grow.

And they just seem completely unable to see it and unable see their own role in help create or sustain it.

This is why, at the moment, I think we are never going to get anywhere. We are in our own little cultural box and have long forgotten that we need to climb out of it.We seem happy in there, away from the rest of the world.

I know that we can do better. That's what's so infuriating and perhaps what keeps me lingering on, like the carrot dangling in front of my nose.

I do see ways in which we can move forward, I do see different things we can do. I do see various levels and channels of nationalism and what roles they could potentially do.

I do try and take things for what they are (and people for who they are) and wonder where they might fit.

I do foolisly have a little optimism that we may finally get something together.......the trouble is, even if we did find the strategy, are we able to change our 'cultural' ways? Given that the history of Nationalism has so far been a negative on that, forgive me for being pessimistic!

Can it change? In 2012, I will have to leave that up to you.

British Nationalism 'Vs' Knotweed

2011-12-29T12:37:00.004Z

Japanese Knot-weed - A tale of our time?

It has been a while since I have treated you all with one of my crazy analogies (lol) - so I thought it was time I filled the gap.

I originally wrote this as a reply to another article on another site which was orientated around numbers and immigration, but thought I might as well add it to my site now that I had typed it.

Without wanting to be the harbinger of doom too much - we have to wake up to the fact that the writing is already on the wall when it comes to demographic numbers.

It is no longer a case of "taking moderate, toned action on immigration to avert catastrophe later" (as some still suggest). That alone is not anywhere near enough, not any more. The real question is, even if numbers were stopped tomorrow, 'what can we do to turn this existing situation around'?

Stopping further immigration almost completely is the necessary requirement in order to make the former job easier. Therefore that particular aim and aspiration for Nationalism goes without even saying.

The more difficult aspect to wrestle with is how we save ourselves - (should that cease of immigration ever be achieved) - considering what is already planted in our garden.

The seed has already been sown, but we (as a wider nation) have yet to see the full 'flower' burst through into full bloom.

They are currently coming out of the nursery beds in great numbers and will soon be entering the main gardens and going on to further pollinate in the future at twice the previous speed, sometimes cross pollinating with other plants.

The government (the garden tenders) are just adding more and more manure (and talking a lot of it too) to make sure their poisonous plant thrives in territory it was not meant to be potted in. But it isn't really needed - for the beast they have planted already thrives on the conditions of the country's habitat which they have 'kindly' provided for it.

The garden tender encourages their growth, provides their nutrients, etc, whilst ceasing to water the plants that originally made the garden great. Those plants are not reproducing themselves in this newly cultivated and unnatural environment. They are put under strain to help provide for the new plants.

The planters have done such a good job encouraging the new plant that the plant thinks the territory is now theirs just as much as any other plant that was there before it.

To them who brought it here and still bring them here, it looks like a nice addition to spruce up the 'drab' garden a little, but they deliberately chose (and still choose) to ignore the very nature of the plant - a plant which eventually suffocates and extinguishes all existing plants (like Japanese knot-weed) and creates a new monoculture in its wake.

It is not always a brutal fate, but more a slow strangulation and domination which builds as something which at first resembles a garden - and can 'blend in' to some degree or another throughout the process of initial change.

In some people's eyes, "it is green, it has leaves and flowers, what is your problem? Looks like a plant to me, just like any other". And indeed it is, nobody can dispute that - but it is more about where it is planted than whether it is a viable plant or not - with its own merits in its own right, in its own traditional environment.

We are all now seeing the shoots of this plant poke through the native soil, right across the whole of England and many parts of urbanised Wales and Scotland. There are not many places left which have no signs of the shoots beginning to break through - albeit in slightly different forms of the plant.

Clusters and clumps are everywhere, some more established than others. Some parts of the landscape are already overrun, but for most dwellers of the nation they are often areas which are out of sight, and thus out of mind.

It is now apparent to most people that change is underfoot, but people seem to have no idea of the pace and scale at which this plant will grow in just a few short years - and what it means for their future garden landscape.

.....After all, they have now long lived in a garden of subtle variety - and throughout this period they have been informed that all plants bleed green chlorophyll when cut - and that no plant is any better than any other plant....so this is nothing to be concerned about at all.

However, like Japanese knot-weed, when the true danger is realised by the common-gardener, the growth rate of this plant will overawe the landscape faster than they can come to terms with it and its effect.

Some of them may clear a new space together and pot some traditional plants well away from the over-run area - but again, like Japanese knot-weed, the environment created there does nothing but entice the invasive plant to germinate there too and get a toe-hold, because they tend to be much nicer and better tended areas.

Before long, the secluded enclave of the garden is unable to defend itself from this intrusion once again. Especially when the existing plants have not had a taste of their future and thus welcome the new addition at first - just like all those before it. The runaway and hide option is not available. There is nowhere to go, and nor will it alter the rest of the situation in the garden if they did find somewhere.

The landscape becomes choked with it, and on the whole the garden becomes increasingly unkempt and unproductive. It no longer resembles (or even smells) like a British garden either.

To remove Japanese knot-weed is extremely hard. It takes a multi-pronged method to prevent its growth and re-growth. It is even harder to remove when many gardeners are unaware and not interested in the threat that is faced by it, and will actually condemn its removal because they have become accustomed to it - and in some cases very fond of it.

The planters and enthusiasts hope it can sell this devastation as a huge benefit for the landscape, citing the tough qualities of the plant (for example) and telling us that it does its job to help global warming by turning carbon dioxide into oxygen, and that its growth rate is therefore a massive bonus for us all - even though all these verbal tricks make no real difference to the fate of the existing flora and fora.

Attempts are also being made to try and genetically splice the different plants together to make people forget the true variety of indigenous plants we once cherished, ready for that monoculture, so that the younger green fingered gardeners of tomorrow will have no knowledge of anything any different than what is already here and planted in our garden today.

To successfully remove Japanese knot weed from the landscape takes some very brutal gardening measures. The history of worldwide landscape gardening teaches us all this and our garden will ultimately be no different to that of other gardens which have had invasive and expansive species planted within the borders and rockeries.

This unfortunately leads to the second question of our time: Do the wider public have the stomach (or understanding of the problem) in order to act accordingly within the time left for the landscape to be saved from ruin?

Are they prepared to get their pitch forks out, flame throwers, tarpaulin sheets etc to smother this problem before it becomes too great to collectively act upon as a whole, no matter what stripe of gardener they were before?

Will the more weak willed gardener even be prepared to turn a blind eye whilst others attempt to take action? Will they ever switch off their X-boxes, football and Coronation Street long enough to even hear the calling we shout, never mind understand it and support it?

Unfortunately, I believe the answer to that question is 'no'. No, they are not and no they will not. They show no signs of doing thus far, anyway. I have little reason to believe they will in the near future either.

The third question is therefore either 'how do we achieve this then?' or 'what do we do then, given this worst case scenario?'.

But this is where I ask you to put your answers on a postcard to Gardeners World........because I suspect that is the answer which we all seek, and no matter how many articles we read and write, how many silly 'flash in the pan' campaigns we have, how many comments we write to papers and blogs, how much we moan etc - the answer is not going to materialise.

All we can do is cultivate conditions which are geared towards helping and pushing forward, just in case, through a miracle of some kind, that an unexpected turn occurs and we can tend to our garden once again.

In many ways, we all know what the answer needs to be - but we cannot envision it happening, nor face it, even if it was popular and well backed, which it isn't.

No matter what we do, we will tend to be seen as thugs who are ruining a picnic in the public garden by ripping up what we believe are dangerous and poisonous plants that will suffocate the picnic dwellers in the end.

We are extreme gardeners acting with good horticultural knowledge - the picnic people are not green fingered. They are just out to have a "good time".

They are like city kids who have no knowledge of animal welfare in the countryside, who are going to be angry and annoyed that the sacred cow of their immediate surrounding is being shot in the head - even though it was riddled with TB, had broken its leg, was a threat to the rest of the herd and was suffering greatly.

They only see the horror, the nastiness, the brutality of the action being taken - and not the 'knowing compassion' of the farmer pointing the shotgun. This makes it hard to win support, for we unfortunately have to operate on this kind of basis if we are to create conditions for the rest of the herd to survive.

There are only a few glimmers of hope left on my horizon. Just a few "not yet dones" of "thinking outside the box" left. They are grasping at straws too, to be honest. Some of them are very dark and shocking (though non-violent!), others are more dreamy and much more geared for polite society.

I hope to concentrate on the latter ones, no matter how futile they may be. It seems to me like all is already lost, but despite the seeming futility, I would rather see some kind of struggle being waged against the knotweed than have us just 'down tools' and watch the natural fora and flora be forever put into the shade.

Some Refutations........

2011-12-12T21:26:00.000Z

I suppose I have again been neglecting the blogsite lately, but that is not to say I haven't been busy or not writing anything. Besides, I think would rather write something for this site when I feel I have something in particular to say, rather than just produce random output for the sake of keeping it topped up.

Anyway, back to business.....

After quite a leave of absence when it comes to facing down what people these days seem to call "libtards", I thought I would throw my hat into the ring and try and 're-cut my teeth' on providing some come-backs to some of the points and positions they make.

The primary objective of this, from my point of view, was to throw things out there and see what came back.

If I ended up being "beaten" and shown to be a complete fool, then I thought I would either have to "take it on the chin" and accept it, change my ways - or try other angles and use the experience to hone some further skills on how to plug up the holes which they had managed to break through.

As it turns out, I did not seem to have much trouble -but that is not to say that the ideas, replies and such I gave out are perfectly correct or should be employed without caution and some basic understanding of the directions I tried to use.

It reminds me a lot of something which I wanted to get off the ground for the last seven years or so, but never managed to pull it together or find others interested in helping me with the project.....

The focus of the topic that these replies were penned for, stemmed from the Emma West "Tram Lady" issue from earlier this month. Again, just like a spotted several years ago, the opposition groups have a standard set of comebacks, which perhaps only comprise of around ten main focus points.

For example, slavery, colonisation of America and Australia, doing the jobs we will not do, they pay for our pensions, doctors and nurses we needed, curry and foods, English going to live in Spain,the British Empire 'stealing their wealth', no such thing as English/nation of immigrants/mongrel race etc, how we went to war with Hitler to fight views like ours......

That is probably the main set. The others are variations on the same theme or based on egalitarianism and emotional themes of "hurt" and "not judging peoples character by their skin tone" etc.

The idea I had several years ago was to hone a near water-tight refutation of all those standard points, so that they can be used time and time again, instead of wasting so much time reinventing the wheel.

Even if they could not be honed that well, I hoped that they could at least stall a debate and make our opposition work as hard as we have to work to counter their points.

I am not really one for bothering to engage with this kind of thing any more, but whilst I have been off work on holiday (and off a bit sick, like always happens when I stop working!) I thought I would have a crack at arguing with the opposition.

They are not perfect replies. Some parts of them are taken from other replies I have seen elsewhere over the years. They are not designed or suitable for "copy and pasting", so watch out for that.

They are not there to provide "stock" answers. I am providing the following responses for the purposes of providing others with a certain line-of-thought, which they themselves may have either forgotten or not thought about for themselves.

Use them at your own risk - and use them only if you understand them and can defend them, otherwise you will look pretty silly when you cannot come up with the same standard of reply or continue the type of language being used in them, or cannot back up the thinking behind the points being made.

In an ideal world, I should properly sit down and professionally compile these into a more suitable format (as I had previously intended). But, I think life is too short, especially for me when I am not sure how long I will be bothering to concern myself with Nationalism and the various issues we face.

I thought you'd better have them now than maybe not at all. I thought they may be better on here, than sat on my computer or sat randomly between another 630 replies on a random website.

If you want to see the true context of the replies I am responding to, you will find them on the British Resistance website, on the article called "Emma West: Truth or Racial Harassment" - which is currently the highest commented article on the site.

They are in no particular order, and the lengthy 'all encompassing' set of replies to the "sympathiser" were not submitted for publication there, so they are exclusive to being here at the Independent British Nationalist blog.

Be warned, they are all quite substantial!

Okay, here it goes:

Response to an argument about the English going to live in Spain:

Please do not begin with the silly Brits in Spain argument. It does not hold water as an argument against Nationalism and nor does it stand up to an equivalent of what is happening here in this country.

You know what, this may surprise you - but the thing is, many of us do not think it is right for loads of British to try and turn parts of Spain into English enclaves and for them to be insular and gate themselves off from the Spanish people and culture. The same goes for the Han Chinese moving into Tibet, and so on and so forth.

Nor do we support the lager louts and the "Oi! Oi!!! ENG_ERRRR_LAAAAAAND!!!!" type idiots and whatever else goes on over there that embarrasses this country and no doubt annoys the Spanish people.

The other difference is that we are racially and culturally quite similar compared to what is arriving here, largely Christian rooted too. They are European after all, despite the few hundred years of Islamic rule which they fortunately and heroically managed to break free of.

But perhaps the main difference is that the majority of people that have historically gone to Spain from this country have been people who are retired- ie pensioners.

The demographic has largely been "older" - ie, they are not young and they are not going to be having offspring which will render the Spanish people a minority in their own country.

"Ex-Pats" have paid their way, support themselves, often buying their villas, not being on welfare and whatever - after working hard all their lives here in this country in order to afford it.

In our case, however, we are being flooded with a young non-European demographic which is of child rearing age - as can be seen by the bulging birthrate of immigrants at a disproportionate rate to that of the indigenous population.

This is how the ethnic minority make-up of London schools has transformed another 50% rise in a matter of a decade and why they now comprise a majority percentage of secondary school children in the capital and in other cities like Birmingham and Leicester.

I do not believe that Spain's major cities are bursting at the seems with young English children swamping their schools and rendering the Spanish people a minority, receiving houses, welfare, translation services and so on and so forth.......

......and like I say, I would not be happy about it if they were, I would be supporting the rights of the Spanish to close the door! Just like I advocate here for my own people and my own country. The argument you level against us is actually ours, not exclusively yours.

Response to need for immigrant labour in the 50s and 60s

As for the apparent need for immigrant labour -what rubbish. It was often down to the government not wanting the expense to train the public and how they wanted to import workers instead because it was cheaper and because it would keep wages down. Nothing changes on that score does it?!

Take for example the northern cotton mills. It was clear that the industry was on its knees and unable to cope with the rates of pay in India. It was clutching at straws to lower wages in order to increase profit margins upon sale. But it could not be done forever.

However, they and the government imported thousands of workers from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan knowing full well that it could not be sustainable. They lied and said they would "go home" when the work dried up.

They saddled this country with a massive burden, then closed down the factories, sold the machinery off to India and laid off all the white and the Pakistani labourers, who did not return home.

The mill owners and the government did not give a rats ass about the legacy they had made in their short-term and short sited policies - much like large international corporations and big business still like to import cheaper staff, leave us with a demographic legacy and bugger off to cheaper countries as the whim fits.

You seem to support all that, and seem to support asset stripping other nations of their trained people, such as doctors and nurses, whilst our own doctors and nurses cannot find work and are having to head off to Australia and Canada. The whole situation is ludicrous.

What do we have now, via some of their descendants of the mill generation and the chain migration policies for the last 5 decades?

Grooming, drug dealing, mosques and calls of prayer over the Pennine hills, towns which are over 30% Muslim, voter fraud, large unemployment, racial tension and resentment, Islamic fanaticism, terrorist plots, segregated societies and the need to social engineer high schools to prevent violent conflict happening.

I hope those 'workers' you talk about from the 50s and 60s were "worth it" - because I do not think it has been worth it in the slightest. It has been a burden, a drain, a nightmare that is not finished yet.

The same with the descendants of the Africans and Afro Caribbean in London and elsewhere, and continued chain migration etc. What legacy has come from that?

Gang crime, shootings, stabbings, rapes, failing schools, unemployment, fragmented societies, ghetto culture, rumbling resentment on all sides, riots, looting, to name but a few things.

Not all as rosy and smooth as you make out is it?

Response to how we should be shamed and how we faught off "Nazi's" like us, which was "Britain's greatest achievement"

I'm sorry, but I have to laugh at how you believe that standing up to Hitler was "our nations greatest achievement".

Seriously? Are you sure you might not be over exaggerating?

Do you not think that anything else we we have created or done throughout our nations history, I don't know, such as ingenious machinery which has changed the world, medical advancements which have changed the world, or how our devised systems of law and order have been mimicked around the world, abolishing slavery (at our great expense, I may add) - etc etc- may surpass that of embroiling ourselves in a relatively short conflict that was firstly none of our business, secondly cost us the British Empire and thirdly helped kill off around 20% of the European racial population of the world including millions of our fellow citizens?

What is truly being disrespectful to our fallen is people like yourself who are using the wartime effort to justify liberal-left social policies, multi-racialism, multiculturalism 'anti-racism' etc - which will eradicate the people of the nation those war hero's went to war to preserve the future of!

That is what is disgusting and immoral behaviour. You are the one who should be ashamed of yourself, not us.

Do you honestly believe that in the 1930s and 1940's the good people of this country went to war in order that their own future generations would be turned into minorities in their own homeland and that we would find ourselves alienated and colonised by other races and all encompassing systems of life like Islam, and so that we could be ruled by unelected transnational treatise and constructs like the European Union? Seriously?! Come on!

So, no doubt according to you, we went to war in order to not be invaded by foreign peoples (Germans) with designs on our country, to defend democracy, and for us to remain a free and sovereign nation.

Well, how is that working out for you?

We have been invaded by much worse foreign peoples, some of them with an extremist ideology to equal or surpass Hitler, we do not really live in a true democracy any more and we are governed by other nations and unelected bureaucrats - ironically, mostly the Germans at this time.

So what did they die for again exactly?.......

The disgrace is what has happened to this country since the war, where, also ironically, foreign metal thieves are ripping the brass plates from our war dead memorials up and down the country.

How proud those war dead must be of our "tolerance" and what we have done to their legacy!

You seem to be under the impression that we are all the same, that we all have the same problems and all problems stem from the same proportions of various communities now loitering in this country. They are not.

Violent crime (such as shootings and stabbings and rapes) are disproportionately carried out by blacks, drug dealing is disproportionately carried out by Asians, prostitution and child trafficking is disproportionately carried out by Eastern Europeans and others from the 3rd world nations.

Grooming of our young teenage children by gangs is disproportionately done by Asians. Postal voting fraud carried out disproportionately by Asians, lack of driving insurance, mostly Asians. Begging and child begging is almost exclusively done by Romanians, Cannabis factories are almost exclusively Vietnamese..... Need I carry on?

Former immigrants and their descendants are disproportionately out of work than the indigenous population, in some cases by a ratio of 3:1 and 4:1.

Illnesses and strains on the NHS are often due to things like the spread of AIDS and TB (both of which almost entirely due to immigration). Add in translation costs, over crowded living conditions, health tourism and shipping tablets out to other nations etc - plus of course various other diseases re-merging which we had once completely eradicated from this country.

Of course our society had and has its "own" problems - but why on earth do you think we needed all these other ones importing too?

You can also add in things like Female Genital Mutilation, disembowelling and limb amputation of children for Voodoo rituals, forced marriages, Islamic terrorism/fanaticism, over crowding, development on greenbelt, community discord, racial riots and so on and so forth.

Was our own relatively TINY amount of social and national problems not quite enough for you or something?!

Is that what you think our forefathers went to war for to let happen to this country?! What a disgrace. Shame on you. You spit on their graves by your passive acceptance of what is going on and rubbishing people (like Nationalists) who seek to preserve and defend this country from destructive forces of cultural Marxism and the problems of mass immigration.

Of course our own society has bad elements and problems - binge drinking, drug abuse, wife beating and so on and so forth. We Nationalists do not condone them and we despise what often manifests itself as "British Culture" now.

We recognise we are not perfect and we nationalists recognise that we need to deal with the destruction of our nation - our own people included. However, they are our own people at the end of the day - not unwanted interlopers we never asked for.

We quite rightly resent what is happening at their hands and the hands of the governing classes. Our "home grown" and traditional problems are minuscule compared to what has been brought to our table by others.

Most serious British Nationalists and the British National Party have never "blamed" everything on immigrants anyway - they largely blame the Government and the liberal elites which have foisted this disgusting and increasingly degenerate nation upon us.

That is where the true blame lay and where the focus of our condemnation has sought to be aimed towards.

But let us get back to that war for a moment....... do you believe the same old lies that we fought WW2 "to save the Jews" and "defeat fascism and racism" etc, and that is why our brave forefathers signed up and went to war?

.....If so, that is quite frankly nonsense on stilts. I do hope you do not believe those kinds of things.

It was the deep love of our island home which inspired the soaring rhetoric of Winston Churchill, which drove men to fight on the beaches of Normandy and the deserts of north Africa, which compelled exhausted bomber crews to fly on missions for night after night over Germany, and what enabled the British public to survive the Blitz so stoically, etc.

It was due to patriotism, an extension of the natural loyalty we feel to our families, friends and neighbourhood.

Ie, Our kith and kin, our nation, our people, our future.

That is why they did it - for England to remain England, for Britain to remain Britain and comprised of the British people and British way of life.

How is that looking now?

How will that be looking and feeling 25 years from now? 40 Years from now? Do you seriously expect us to believe that the war dead would be looking down upon us and congratulating what has happened to this country and praising us on how "tolerant" and "inclusive" we are being?

The modern liberal narrative has given off the entirely wrong lessons from the Second World War. You seem to have swallowed it hook line and sinker.

Instead of being presented as a magnificent defence of our native land and people against an aggressor, the conflict is now portrayed as a triumph for the forces of political correctness against right-wing extremism.

In this warped narrative, such as the one you seem to believe in your comment above, the Second World War has been transformed into a gigantic crusade against xenophobia, while our soldiers, sailors and airmen are regarded as armed outreach workers in a vast anti- racism project.

The sense of unifying national identity that once motivated millions of Britons to defend their homeland is held to be suspect by a political elite obsessed with cultural diversity.

We are told that opposition to mass immigration is the equivalent of siding with the Nazis, so we therefore must accept it, accept being gradually snuffed out of existence for the whims of international socialism.

By the way, when Germany attacked Poland, Britain did precious little to come to Poland’s aid. It was only after the Nazis advanced through western Europe in May 1940 that Britain, under the new leadership of Winston Churchill, began to fight in earnest. This shows that the war was really about perceived national defence, not an ideological campaign of any kind.

I suggest you get off your fake moral high ground before you try and denigrate the genuine patriots of this country. It is not as 'clear cut' and 'all equal' as you like to believe. I may be being harsh, but I think you need to see it from another perspective for once.

Response to sympathiser of the above reply, but who supports civic ideas and says we haven't to judge others on "malanin" levels and should treat people all the same, not like Emma West ("Tram Lady") - and asks what do I include as "we" when it comes to indigenous British.

Thank you. It seems that you can appreciate some of the points being made and how they are quite legitimate and justified concerns which, as you say yourself, need to be tackled.

To do justice to the other points you query, I think I need to give you a bit of a run-down on the much deeper issues so that you may be able to appreciate the context of what is going on and what other issues are on our table, from our perspective here.

You may have to “hold on your hat” because I understand how wild and 'extremist' this thesis may sound.

There are major clues in your reply that give me indication that you are missing out a very large piece of understanding what 'drives' some of our objections and positions towards others.

However, I will answer your question starting from the beginning of your reply, about the opposing argument that some people propose, i.e., that the fight against Hitler was 'against racial intolerance and oppression'. The argument has no real merit in fact or in deed, that is why I challenged it.

The war was not fought for that reason, and the other general idea people have in the post-war narrative that Hitler was somehow wanting to eradicate all other races off the face of the Earth or 'had it in for the Jews' simply because they were racially different or deemed 'inferior' is not really correct either in my opinion and in my understanding.

I was told those same kinds of things and I followed those (somewhat simplistic, it has to be said) lines of thought and I believed them for a long time - until I finally became aware of what was really going on and what the issues are.

But I am not here to support Hitler (because I do not) and I am not really here to debate aspects of that point in history either - because the whole WW2 situation has little to do with British Nationalism, or true Nationalism at all.

The kind of argument that tends to go around that the British National Party and Nationalists in general are "far right" and "fascists" and "race haters" has no real basis in the truth. Some of the representatives may be cretins at times, we may often reduce things to ‘short bursts’ at times, such is life, but that is not what we are about or founded for.

The British National Party is neither "far right" by manifesto policy, "neo Nazi" by deed or indeed "fascist" by true definition either - nor do proper nationalists "hate" other races of the world for their existence on the planet, or do we really deem ourselves as being of "more worth" or "better" – but of course we can proudly trumpet what good things we have brought to the table, just like anybody else.

That is why it gets so boring and so predictable when opponents of nationalism throw up Hitler, WW2, Fascism, "racial intolerance" - it is a lazy, lazy, canard primarily used to uphold and usher in liberal-left immigration policies, cultural Marxism, international socialism.

That is why these people who repeat them so blindly are what the orchestrator's of this themselves called "Useful Idiots".

They are tools being used to serve a purpose that they are not even aware of. You may want to look up the School of Frankfurt objectives and the method of Critical Theory etc. for this kind of issue if you are not aware of what I am talking about.

In short (and this is a basic list of their objectives) they aimed to achieve the following things in order to later achieve their true goals:

1.The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy national identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking and drug abuse
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

Go through that list, and honestly ask yourself whether those objectives and ambitions have been fulfilled.....I think all of them can be ticked off. If you believe we have got to where we are organically and ‘by accident’ I believe that you may need to learn about how our civilisation has been purposefully under attack by means other than warfare.

----------

When it comes to your other question, I am proudly an ethno-centric British Nationalist and when I speak of my people, "Britons", I refer explicitly to Caucasians and the ethnic indigenous people of Britain whose homeland this is.

The indigenous people of Europe and Britain are white, which is a simple matter of fact which cannot be escaped from. It is not because they are "white" which brings me here, it is because they are indigenous and this is our continent and our homeland and these are my people, my kith and kin, my extended family.

If the shoe was on the other foot and Europe was indigenously Black, and I was thus black, I would be here for the exact same reasons, much like I support Tibetan people to remain so, and Black people in their homelands to remain so.

Nationalism and being proud of your race and identity is for all people, only it seems you can be seen to be proud to be black, proud to be Asian, proud to be Chinese......but say you are 'proud to be white' and proud of our white ethnic heritage and you are deemed evil and full of hate! Either that, or condemned as a complete idiot.

Why should that be so? Why the double standard? Find out about the agenda being waged and I think you will come to appreciate why this is the case and why it is seemingly only applicable to Western civilisation (ergo “White” civilisation).

Nationhood by traditional definition is steeped in racial roots, ancestry, shared history, shared ethnicity, values and customs. The noted concept of Jus Sanguinis, for example, stretches right back to Romans and Greeks. Many nation states still operate a repatriation law based on this, where automatic or rapid citizenship is given to members of Diasporas of their own dominant ethnic group.

"Nation" itself is an English word too often misused or taken for granted, with its real meaning ignored or obscured.

Nation does not refer to a governmental entity officially recognised by the UN, nor even to a plot of land with specified borders. Nation, from the Latin nasci ("to be born"), means a race, a people that shares a common experience, tradition, and, most important, ancestry.

We believe we have a right to self preservation of our homeland and for our indigenous people to remain intact and in permanent majority in our own homeland. It has always been a right of nations, which is why nations have always fended off threats and invasions – yes, including from some of our ancestors at times.

It is even charted in modern terms by the UN declaration on human rights and indigenous peoples - only, for some strange reason, it only seems to apply to non-white people and nations!

It is recorded fact that in 1951 this nation was officially 99.8% indigenous "white". A previous churn of 0.2% “others” when spread out extremely randomly throughout Britain never posed any problem at all and nobody, not even the most hardened "white supremacist" would suggest it was a problem.

By 2051 though, just 100 years later, we are due to be a minority in nearly every major town and in every major city of this nation - and virtually going extinct by the end of the century. 100 years! That's all! If it was happening elsewhere in the world, I am pretty sure there would be uproar by the stereotypical 'guardian' reading masses.

Surely, even if you do not care about these issues, you can appreciate that the pace and scale of this is unprecedented and that we are in a unique position of not being able to defend ourselves by physically fighting off this threat - and unique in that we are now happily surrendering our land to other races and religions without so much as a bad word being able to be said, even being told to welcome it and congratulate it as a huge benefit!!!

This is not an exaggeration or "scaremongering" either. It is already forecast by serious academics and demographers, and the process is, if anything, speeding up thanks to what Labour *purposefully* did to this country whilst it was last in office.

Most past predictions were based on the 1991 and 2001 census and trends, and millions of people have arrived since then, going from a migration of some 50,000 per year to that of over 250,000 per year throughout this period up to 2011!

-----------------

This terminal decline of our ethnicity is going to be happening because it will be impossible for us to recover and survive intact within these borders when presented with the demographic reality of what is already here - never mind what is still coming every single year.

It is the same situation for Germany, France, Denmark, Italy etc. As a whole, we are being picked off one by one.

When it comes to "white" people around the world, it is important to remember that before the Second World War we were somewhere around 30% of the world demographic. After the war losses we dropped to around 15%, and now at this very moment in time we are just below 8% and due to tuck down below 6% in a matter of a few years time.

(Yes, this included all 'white' people of Europe, America, Australia, Canada and anywhere else).

It is no exaggeration to say that "white" people are being slowly eradicated from the planet via means of carefully orchestrated measures designed to break apart Western Civilisation, by structures that stem the capacity to have/afford children (for example), whilst simultaneously promoting mass migration of non European peoples into our homelands, promoting and encouraging racial intermixing etc.

These kinds of measures are given as examples of being those in order to commit genocide, under the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. That they are not waving guns in our faces or forcibly stopping us having lots of children (for example) is not important, the effects of their actions are having the same end result. They know full what is happening and what is likely to happen as a result of their policies. They are therefore complicit.

Like most other people around the world, I happen to care for my people, my race, and my ethnicity and find it a great tragedy that this situation is taking place.

I extend the same for other races and cultures around the world and I defend their rights to have their homelands and fend off transformations that would prove fatal to their continuance. I am an upholder of true diversity, not an eradicator or opponent of it.

What we are seeing today, via increased "diversity" *within* nations is an eradication of diversity *between* nations and eventually there will be little diversity at all, all controlled and under the Koch of world governance as little more than cash cows and consumers.

You may be selfish and not particularly care beyond your own lifespan/surroundings and you may not care about upholding diversity in this way or protecting the integrity of your own racial group from this fate - as is your right - but some of us do care and do recognise why it is important, and surely it is an odd situation where it is those who "do not care" who get to set and seal the fate of those who do care and who have only ever sought simple measures to defend ourselves!

When it comes to simple continuance, it takes a white mother and a white father to make a white child, no other option can do that. Now that we are only 8% of the world demographic, it unfortunately means that only around 2% of the worlds demographic are white women capable of child bearing.

That is the world context, which I feel is important to bear in mind to put you in the bigger picture, but of course Britain is a portion of that and like many other nations we are being deluged to the point we cannot carry on and survive as we have done since the thawing of the Ice Age (from which around 80% of the indigenous people of this country can trace their DNA origins).

If we were not being so threatened inside our own borders by these trends, the ebb and flow of demographic "Total Fertility Rate" (TFR) would not really matter too much. It would correct itself up and down as what has normally happened before.

This is the basic reality of demographics:-

Our indigenous ethnic T.F.R is currently around 1.4 and has been for a long time. To have basic self-replacement takes 2.1.

A "T.F.R" of less than 1.3 halves the population within 45 years, creating a falling-off-a-cliff effect from which it would be nearly impossible to recover. No civilisation of people has survived such a drop before.

Pakistani mothers, Bangladeshi mothers and Somali mothers in this country have had a T.F.R of around 4.2 and 3.5. Muslims in particular are practising traditional "Fecundity" agendas for the text book definition of their obligatory duty that is entwined in their “culture”.

----------

People expect that it would take hundreds and hundreds of years to tip the balance, and thus find this whole argument of a risk to self survival preposterous - but in reality, it can take little more than two generations to tip that balance so that it is 'even', then, due to age structure, it quickly shifts the opposite way in under half the time.

For example, we typically now have an (ageing) structure of 4 grandparents, 2 parents, 1 grandchild. There are of course exceptions, but bear with me on the average.

To take a conservative figure of “immigrant origin” TFR at even 3.0, they could typically have 4 grandparents, 6 parents, 18 grandchildren. Those 18 Children become the grandparents......and so on and so forth.

Therefore, in the space of that simple time frame......we are left with *1* child (perhaps 2) whereas the ethnic family has amounted *18*. This process does not have to go on for very long before the balance tips, and it has already been going on for decades now.

This is also bearing in factors such as a non static and decreasing T.F.R rate for these groups, which would be okay if they were here in small numbers, were declining, spread out and 'evening out' with the host population, and without further mass migration and population change taking place.

But that is not the case, is it.....

It is already the case that ethnic minorities now comprise over 33% of the under 5 age group in England and Wales. (This was revealed in official ONS statistics based on records from the year 2005 and has been reported in the press).

Leicester and Birmingham are already "Plural" cities where indigenous people are a minority, London is to follow shortly, and places like Blackburn (even according to BBC supplied figures) are 33% Asian/Muslim at the moment, again, the majority of which are young.

“Well? So what?!”, you may say - as it is often said that we are a "nation of immigrants" and that what is taking place now is no different to before. But that is a complete lie. The British were one of the most homogeneous and racially intact peoples on the planet.

The whole “Saxons, Normans, Huguenots” 'mongrel-breed' line people take is quite absurd when you consider that all of the above are the same racial people from the same part of north west of Europe, all pretty similar in culture, language, customs and heritage, that the migration was minuscule in proportion to the whole (i.e., less than 2% over the span of centuries) and that, for example, when it comes to the so called "Jewish waves" only around 50,000 Jewish people had moved here in the space of hundreds of years. Many of them later left for the United States.

There are a lot of unfounded cliché’s that do the rounds. One is that we are a “nation of immigrants”, another is that “diversity is a great strength”, another is that “lazy British do not work and scrounge welfare”, another is that we “need immigrants to pay for our pensions” and throughout the Labour years the claim was that they “benefitted the economy”.

On all counts, they are lies and do not stand up to evidence or scrutiny.

Please bear all this information in mind when it comes to making a judgement upon us and what we stand for, even if you do not agree to uphold it yourself.

----------

I say this because, in your reply, you seem to think that our argument is about "prejudice" and "not judging people on the colour of their skin" and how "the degree of melanin in their skin does nothing to define their personality" etc.......your words.

As you may now see (?) - It has nothing really to do with any of that. We are bitter and angry about what has happened, what is currently happening and what will be coming in the future. I think we have just cause to be angry and bitter too.

I would happily treat any racial or religious minority (as an individual) on a mutual and friendly basis, I do not believe all Muslims are suicide bombers (or predisposed that way!) or that all blacks are rapists and gang members etc.

I do understand general racial differences though (race is not just melanin levels or skin colour, by the way!) because I am a race-realist. I have studied the topic and as such I understand why various societies in this world are the way they are and why we are facing a complete nightmare for the future here in Britain and Europe (which is a deep subject) - but of course - I will treat any person with common decency if they are doing likewise to me. (This is why it jars a to see the Tram video clip, because the individual targets and focus points are wrong).

However, that does not mean that the situation going on is right or acceptable, that I welcome it or welcome them here (on that basis) and all the rest of it. Far from it - I would like a halt and a reversal as much as possible.

But I do not "hate" other races; I do not "hate" other religions. I want to simply preserve and protect the integrity of my own people in my own homeland, and when it comes to a potential religious and sharia law aspect gathering momentum in the future as their particular numbers grow (an aspect on top of all the others!), I do not want to allow this country to eventually become an Islamic state or partitioned off at some point down the line.

It is not about being "against" others, it is being "for" ourselves and our future.

Since the days of the 1948 nationality act, through Enoch Powell in 1968, up to now, all we have ever wanted is rational and humane controls to avert the very problems and situations we see today. But no, they were denied to us - and are effectively still denied to us!

It is also a bit rich to say that people should not be judged on their skin colour, when white people suffer eternal collective guilt for all the perceived sins of our forefathers and sins of other regimes like Hitler who we happened to actually fight against!

We are judged and "put upon" for our skin colour all the time, in a way which endangers our very collective future.

Parliament is apparently "too pale, male and stale", the BBC termed itself "hideously white", I think it was the arch bishop of Canterbury who was (a few years ago) doing some slavery march in shackles to atone for historic sins of “our” slavery days (of which we were not alone, nor the first, but the ones who abolished it!).

The applicable examples of things of anti-white racism and “collective guilt” are endless.

-------------------

When it comes to the Tram Lady, Emma West, I am at odds with many on this site on this issue. I said that she does not really speak for me, or represent me and my argument. That is still the case, for me. I cannot really say I would clap and cheer if I was in the carriage, not least because I do not see how it could ever be helpful other than venting a bit of anger and having a “you tell ‘em!” trophy moment.

Whilst I can understand her frustration and alienation - and will 100% defend her right to say whatever she likes about any subject or group of people in this country (aside from calling for their deaths!) - I personally do not want to hold her up as a great asset or ambassador of our cause. I do not believe she is a “nationalist” like I am.

I get the impression that she is just an ordinary woman who is sick and tired of what is happening to this country, was obviously provoked in some way before the film started rolling, and it just flew out of her mouth in the only way she probably knows how.

She knows the whole situation we are in is 'wrong' somehow, but I do not think she has had the right tools to express it or understand it, not least because giving people understanding of the subjects has been avoided and has been avoided for over 60 years.

I am not going to throw her to the lions, wash my hands and denounce her – but nor would I put her on a pedestal either. I know that will annoy many other people here, but that is how I feel about it.

The equal hysteria over her by the press, the transport people, the police and "anti racist" bodies is insane too. It smacks of a “witch hunt” for heresy against orthodox opinion. People who have stabbed passengers to death do not receive this kind of frenzied coverage.

What has apparently happened to her since being ‘found’ by the authorities is a true disgrace in a so called free society. It is more disgusting and frightening than anything that she could have said – and they are, after all, only words and an opinion. The implications of what has happened are alarming, and this is perhaps the only area in which I can now lend complete support to her.

My earlier posts surmised a general viewpoint on matters which have to be addressed - as you also admitted yourself.

This set of posts may explain a further and much deeper set of positions to those - even though I do not expect you to automatically subscribe to them or accept them.

I merely ask you to think about them and bear them in mind when these kinds of topics cross your lap in the future.

Current levels of immigration to this country raises questions not only about numbers and racial survival in the long term, but also about integration in the medium term - and we nationalists simply acknowledge that the second is related to the first.

As stated earlier, until the mid part of the 20th Century, the immigrant population comprised only a very small proportion of the total population, less than 1%, which meant that in order to flourish they had to adapt to the prevailing culture and integrate and be assimilated in *all* ways eventually.

Nationalists (and probably most sane people) believe that this gave Britain an enviable record of social harmony and a good, safe society - which always tends to accompany near-homogeneous nations.

However, the presence of large ethnic communities after 1948, for some of whom integration with the host culture is not really an aim (such as Islamic peoples who have their own system of life to adhere to), is threatening this social harmony.

We are people who cherish our race, our nation, our ancestry and we are people who cherish Britain's comparative stability, freedom, and tolerance.

We feel we cannot afford to ignore the potential threat that is posed to it all by the large-scale changes in its demographic composition – something that is now taking place as a result of recent large-scale immigration in combination with declining fertility among its indigenous population.

I believe society will always find it harder to reproduce its political culture and to maintain its traditions the less deeply rooted its members become in it both historically and ethnographically, especially when it is so rapidly changing. It is human nature.

-----------

Infrastructure, housing, schools, jobs, traffic, health care, energy resources, food resources, societal problems and increased crime are all reasons in themselves why things are not going well and should be stopped.

Add to it all these other “deeper” factors too, and in my opinion it lends extra weight to the argument of how we need to stop and reverse some of these trends.

I hope you can see that it is not about "race hate", "Paki's smell", "Chinese eat dogs", "prejudice" "bigotry" etc. etc., which is the kind of un-thinking 'knuckle dragging' image so often applied to us.

It can be seen on this websites comment section that there is some extreme hate coming from the opposite side - who find no problem in gloating about “serves you right” “empire strikes back!” “We are taking over, you are not superior anymore!” etc and have a belligerent and hate fuelled view of this country and its people.

They have been trained and programmed to hate their host.

The resentment and hatred is bubbling in them and they quietly (and not so quietly) express their group self interest and take pleasure at our situation.

If we are doing things in their interest, being passive, being quiet, then they are fine and expressing the “all equal” tone. Cut a little deeper, resist their demands, apportion some blame where it is due, and they are quick to plunge that knife in and reveal themselves for what lurks beneath.

When we are confronted with those obnoxious and arrogant attitudes from ethnic minorities (and self-hating white liberals), you will have to forgive us when we become just as obnoxious, nasty, “short-hand” and 'racist' back!!! Personally, I would not hesitate to have all such people thrown out on their ear tomorrow. They are invaders and forgo their right to be accepted into our fold.

Regards,

-------------------------------------------

Response to a cry-baby African youth saying "we stole his country and resources" and now he suffers racism here, and is hurt and crying, because Black people do everything for us etc.

Here's an idea - rather than bitching and moaning how hard done to you all are here, allegedly wiping our behinds (unasked) - why don't you all save yourselves a LOAD of misery and hardship that WE never asked you undergo, and PISS OFF back to Africa and go and make something of the place?

Hows that for an idea?! If you don't want to be "persecuted" and "suffer discrimination" and want to stop generally moaning and crying about life here, LEAVE!!!. Don't expect any gratitude from me.

Don't even get going on the "we stole your resources" bull either. You may have had oil and diamonds and gold, but you know what, they would STILL be sat under the ground whilst you numb nuts wouldn't know what use or purpose it had!!! No use to you then, is it?!

Who is raping your backside now? The Chinese! Why? Because AFRICANS cannot do ANYTHING for themselves! They could not organise a slaughter in a village.....oh, hang on! Yes they could!

We have given that black hole £BILLIONS and £BILLIONS and £BILLIONS in our foreign AID money - we built up HUGE parts of your non-existent infrastructure, gave you medicines, electricity, roads and rail and EDUCATED you in OUR founded Universities, such as those built in Nigeria and elsewhere, including South Africa.

Don't come crying to us about how we have done NOTHING but "do-you-over", you ungrateful parasites. Nor visit the deeds of the forefather onto the child, which is against UN law. We here are NOT responsible, we owe you NOTHING.

Name me just ONE, JUST ONE SAFE and DECENT BLACK country to live in? ANY answers? No? You cannot blame it on us that you cannot either! Your fellow folk have been self ruling and self managing yourselves for the best part of a hundred years!!! Look at what happened to 'Rhodesia' when we left that one last century! How proud you must be!

What has happened since our involvement over there?! (which we nationalists DO NOT support, by the way!)

You have degenerated into what it was like BEFORE we ever came and the Chinese are now stealing your natural resources!!! Dear God! Have you no sense of shame or embarrassment?

I suggest you start a movement to get all you "hard working" and "dynamic" black folk right across Britain and Europe to head back there and work your MAGIC to really show us what you can do!!!

What's that? You'd rather stay here in the comfortable and relatively safe and organised WHITE world? Oh dear.......

Stick your "financial burden" up your backside. You invading hordes are OUR "financial burden". Only we pay for you HERE and we STILL pay for your kind back in Africa too!!

Sling your hook, if you want to "get your own back" on us and think you lot are so marvellous and helping "build" our civilisation here, why not DEPRIVE us of this wonderful generosity? That would really show us!

What a laugh.

Sub-response to a melodramatic and gushing retort made to the above response:

Spare us the over-emotional melodramatics. We are not interested. It has no relevance to fact or any relevance the magnitude of this situation going on.

We should not have to take his age into consideration either - which is yet another ridiculous liberal premise that has crept into society in the last six or seven years. "Ooooh people are demonising the youth....the youth are a discriminated minority too!.." "we must shield criticism and soften up the harsh truth from them".......

Get a grip.

He is clearly old enough to claim to understand world affairs, old enough to try and tell us our own history and imply why we should snuff ourselves out as a people and civilisation, and clearly old enough to type on a computer. He is therefore not an infant.

He deserves no special treatment what so ever, for any reason, including his alleged tears - which are only included there for yet more emotional blackmail and melodramatics. He had his say, then I kicked him to the curb because I am not at all interested. It is bigger than him and his alleged sobbing, or me, or you. End of story.

For all we know he is yet another white upper middle class Che Guevara/Hammer and Sickle supporting hippy that has never grown up and who is yanking our chain. It is not as though we are not used to seeing them turn up. Not that it makes any difference.

I know about globalisation and shifting powers, I am not an imbecile. Being a nationalist it should go without saying that I am therefore not a globalist, and know full well what the situation is with that as well as all its other facets and implications.

But that was not even the point I was making in regards to Africa and the Africans - yet I suspect you would not be able to wrap that concept around your liberal fuddled head because it breaks too many taboos all at once.

I have no doubt that you "mean well" and think you are doing the "correct thing" and "feel good" about being "righteous" and "caring" - but you need to wake up and smell the coffee, especially if you are white. You will then have to challenge your brainwashed notions. Then you will come to understand why we are here.

If you are not indigenous to this land, not white, then you have no legitimacy telling us what our fate as a people should be, especially in our own homeland, whether you were born here or not.

Response to same poster, saying I sound like an angry old man who has nothing better to do than put down young people and people who are different to me and what I know.

Okay, here is a slightly less hostile reply.

Yes, you are right that I am angry. I am not alone.

I am angry about what has been done to this nation and angry about what it will lead to in the future. I think I have legitimate right to be extremely angry and bitter, although in truth I am at a stage way beyond anger and bitterness. So are many other people here.

That is why I have little patience for most of the usual melodramatic liberal blowhards who come along here with their incessant flurry of misinformed claptrap, and why I am therefore used to serving things both-barrel without care or consideration.

At least you seem to be here "giving it a go" in a more patient fashion and not being as completely moronic or name-calling as some of the other contenders we have to put up with!

You would not believe the people who come in going on about gas chambers, nazi's, knuckledraggers, fascists, bigots, haters, rhyming off all the usual dogmas and excuses for letting this situation continue.

When you have been involved with this truth and reality as long as I have, the pleasantries and patience tend to have to take a back seat - because this is not a nice topic, it is not a pleasant issue, it is not an easy ride, and it has few easy solutions. It is cold, it is hard and brutal. That is the way it has to be by its very nature.

That is why we good people are angrier even more, because we have been denied and denied the most simplest and humane ways of preventing this country getting the way it has now got - and thus prevented us from halting how it will result in the future.

We are backed into a corner, and that is never a good option to create.

This is done via the same kind of fools who perpetuate the same flawed ideologies and who push and promote the same old agendas.

It is pumped through the TV, the radio, magazines, through all main parties in politics, through the Church, through think tanks, schools, universities, charities and celebrities.

It is a stitch up from top to bottom, hermetically sealed from any other viewpoint, and especially from any action being taken. I hope you can appreciate what I am saying there.

We are therefore heretics. We are a resistance movement. We are annoyed at this situation, annoyed at the people who have let it happen and continue to let it happen.

It is most often not about 'individuals' who have come here or were born here. We do not know them from Adam.

Our focus is not really with them, or anything at all to do with "judging them" or "judging their character on melanin levels” and all the other bizarre misconceptions people have. It is the "scenario", the outcomes, the country we have to live in, the whole picture.

On this, our patience wears increasingly thin. It is a nightmare, which for the indigenous population can only get worse and worse. Do you understand?

Then there are, of course, 'particular' examples which make a total mockery of this country, and I am sure you can imagine those kinds of examples. They just add to the other annoyances.

Ie, People from Africa coming in and being put in 1.2 Million pound houses to house their 7 offspring. Rapists and thieves who cannot be deported because they will be tried for crimes they have committed in their own country - and would face tough penalties if they were returned.

Muslims taking delight in turning ancient church buildings and public houses into mosques, and we being told by politicians and the elite to 'celebrate the diversity' of this and "understand" how it is good for our future.

It is absurd. Surely you can see that from our perspective?!

Then there are things like the "attitude problem" riddled Pakistani grooming gangs that are raping our womenfolk like they are trash. Drug dealers who are peddling their poison and rotting our societies as they enrich themselves and advance their status. People who are butchering children for voodoo rituals and FGM. Shootings, stabbings, beatings, robberies and general violence which is almost all imported to this country.

We do not want it. We do not want them. We do not want to have a country like this, which gets that way "organically" by sheer volumes of people, to the point it degenerates to third world status.

It is no "one persons" fault. See what I mean? It cannot be dealt with in that way.

In those publicised cases, it *is* individuals and much more "specific" -one thing at a time, one case at a time.

But although they are specific cases and specific causes of resentment, they lay *on-top* of the overall situation of our general displacement! It would not be "welcome" or "right" even if they were all law abiding etc.

It therefore blends and blurs into the general situation of what our country is turning into, without our consent or permission. That is how this situation rolls.

Some of the less articulate members of society who do not have the skills to understand what is truly going on (who are not Nationalists, but who are aware that it is not a welcome change or a right change) will obviously lash out in the only ways they know how.

Such as - shouting abuse at foreigners, making silly jokes about burkhas, and all the usual rubbish which litters this kind of debate.

It is unfortunate for a few reasons.

One reason is because they do not particularly "speak for" us or represent us Nationalists, so they can often damage us by implied association - and the other reason is how it is unfortunate for the unsuspecting ethnic member of the public, who are minding their own business, then are suddenly being the butt of the joke or the remarks. It is not their personal fault we have all this.

Emma West was not even so coarse as to use racial epithets, she was just expressing an opinion without any epithets whatsoever. I do not particularly agree with what she did, I wouldn't have done it. But I absolutely defend her right to say it and say whatever she wants, in any way she wants, in her own country.

I strongly oppose what has been done to her as a result of having an opinion and simply expressing herself. It is Orwellian or something akin to Stalin's Russia. That is one of the main reasons why she gets my support on this.

Regarding your reply to mine though, I cannot help but notice that you reply to me once again with 'emotion' based themes and personal attack rather than logical or factual ones.

It is a common theme of those who try and oppose us, because fact , truth and logic is most frequently on our side when you get right down to the nuts and bolts.

Ad-hominem come-backs, name calling, saying how "offensive" it is, and so on and so forth is no sufficient response for people to give. Most often when people do that, they have either no idea what they are talking about or cannot win the argument.

Trying to turn it into a "respecting the youth" thing is not really any better. I see it for what it is, because it is just a side-circus designed to make me look like a "monster" whereas you can be seen as being all petals and roses, "caring and compassionate".

In my view, logic always beats emotion, in the same way that "the pathway to hell is often paved with good intentions".

You see, "not hurting somebodies feelings" is no reason for us ignoring the situation going on, and nor is this a problem which can really be dealt with on a "one to one" individual emotional basis - asking what everyone thinks and feels about it 'one at a time' and having a "discussion" like it is some show on the BBC's "Big Questions".

(They never do come away with a conclusion, do they?!)

Dealing with this matter on that level is not an option. Not any more.

As such, I am not going to really care one jot what some Somali family may feel about the situation of my not wanting them here, for example, or what they think about colonialism, or about anything else.

I do not care about silly topics of head scarves and their supposed "empowerment", or all the other garbage that goes around, and around and around as part of this absurd "multicultural" debate every year.

Their view does not change our fate, are often not even legitimate in this context, and are far too insignificant in the bigger picture to really warrant serious attention.

Whilst we all go around in circles, our situation deteriorates; things move on and get worse and worse.

I am not, for example, going to cease or stop just because some alleged "youth" here turns on the water-works and tries to emotionally blackmail us into submission, especially when I am being served with a huge slice of liberal "guilt trip" pie about our so called sins which were not even mine or anybody alive today. (As did the person above).

Nor am I really going to go easy on people who defend such things and defend such a premise, because they are in effect, condoning what is going on and hammering nails into our collective coffin.

This situation for the very survival of my people and my homeland is something bigger than his emotions, it is irrelevant to me what he thinks about it or what you may think as mere individuals. It cannot be dealt with in this way.

That means that some people are going to be offended, upset, "hurt" emotionally - but if that is the only thing that can happen to them in order to get the message, then it is a very little price to have to pay.

They will get over it in the long run. My people will not.

Therefore, I am not going to hold back or lend tissues to wipe away those alleged tears - because, really, it has gone way past the point of me giving a rats ass. I am not the slightest bit bothered how rude, insensitive or 'hard nosed' it may be.

Attitudes are hardening up, people are getting annoyed and angry, even exasperated.

The liberals have added all the ingredients required for an extremely bloody conflict one day, although, of course, I would hope it does not come to that.

The one-hit-wonder who posted above is a victim of their meddling. He is a victim who in an ideal world would not even be here in this country and would be in his own country, with his own people, making something of that place and being happy and content there.

But it seems everybody wants to flock to white countries, and Africans (and others) cannot wait to get away from other Africans and the societies they build for themselves, then go on to slowly turn our countries into the same problematic heaps they fled from, then tell us that they are improving it and that we should be thankful for it.

We are not thankful for it.

It is not our role, duty, or responsibility to submerge ourselves for the sake of importing them here for a "better life". We do not owe them or anybody else a "better life", nor can we afford or physically fit them all here if we did.

The problem of 3rd world nightmares cannot be solved by transplanting the people that created it into the west. That is partly what the lunatics have been doing. Looking at those puppy-dog-eyes and throwing the gates wide open, putting emotion and hippy international socialist ideals before logic.

Third world countries are going to account for 98% of the world population growth in the next 50 years, for heavens sake. Whilst we cannot afford to have large families, because we are "responsible people", the irresponsible are breeding like it is going out of fashion and we idiotically support them instead of ourselves - and let them take over our homelands too!.

It really is insane.

That is why, if he finds life so awful, unjust, "racist" and hard here, then he can leave, along with the rest of his family.

We never asked for him to arrive, we "ordinary" British people never asked for the Windrush to arrive, the Pakistani mill workers in the 60's, or anybody else. Just like we never asked to go to war with Serbia, establish an independent Kosovo, engage in the "Arab Spring" or go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Whose name do they do all things in? Apparently it is ours. Yet, did you vote for any of it? We certainly didn't! Did we get any say in the matter? No!

Then the morons come at us Nationalists and say: "Serves you right for meddling in world affairs!" "Serves you right for going to Afghanistan!" "Serves you right for........"

.......Hold on! Hold on! It was not us!

Much like we are not wanting engagement with Iran, which seems to be being weaved at the moment. Iranians are holding up signs saying the British are the devils etc.

Whoa! Nothing to do with me! I voted for the only party that would keep out of the entire lot!!! It was not us nationalists who butchered millions of Muslims in the middle east, and we {allegedly} "hate" Muslims right?!! Only we don't hate the Muslims or the Muslim world, we only hate the facilitation of and slow Islamisation of OUR country. We have a right and a duty to resist this!

The same can be said of many other issues we are hated for around the world.

So, I am not going to see my own people wiped out before the end of the century (and live in perpetually increasing violence, corruption and chaos in the meantime) simply because some black youth posting here had a bad day or somebody said some bad words to him once and that he is having a little (fake) sob about it.

I am not going to say "there, there, have a tissue, and seeing as it is *you*, seeing as I now know that *you* personally have been troubled - and seeing as you are a little bit upset, I think we should let you and all your family stay here and even invite more of you over to make you feel better, generally abandon all that is right and all that I believe in"......

No. No. No. That is national suicide. It is not an option.

The time for niceties is coming to a close. I am personally way past that point already.

To you, I sound like an angry old man. But alas, unless you call early/mid 30's being an old man, I think I have some way to go before I reach that status!

God forbid what I will be like when I am over 64 eh! lol ;)

-----------------------------------------

Response to foreign students picking up the slack for lazy British, who cited loads of charts about increases in foreign students, and "discrimination" in finding employment.

The traditional role and duty of any government is to provide adequate jobs and education for the citizens which it represents. They are supposed to be there to represent us - the electorate who elect them into office - and to look after our interests, including the integrity of the people, our freedom, self determination and defence of the realm.

This is surely the basic role of any government. We do not, or at least should not, have them be there to look after everybody else's interests BUT our own.

It has not been in our interests, for example, to have our wages suppressed, our towns and cities transformed, or to have us fight in wars and globe-trot around the world ushering in 'regime change' which is none of our business or concern.

It has not been in our interest to have high unemployment of people already residing here - be they black or white - whilst more and more people come to the country. There is a problem with the system that, in our view, has been purposefully set up to allow this to happen for ideological and vested interests. These are, essentially International Socialism /Cultural Marxism and Corporate Fascism.

That is where our true concern lay, NOT with individuals who have come to take advantage of it. You can keep your "prejudice" jibes to yourself, because you know little about what we are here for. You are "prejudiced" yourself, and quite ignorant of what our positions are.

Whilst our unemployed and near unemployable languish on welfare it costs this country a fortune - which, if our representatives in office had any sense would have realised a more protectionist model of looking after our affairs would have been to the betterment of everybody.

It is arguably better for us to be industrious and working so that we can export manufactured goods and sell goods to our own citizens (even at a slightly higher price) than it is to perpetuate this unemployment and welfare model and have a "race to the bottom" of globalisation.

I believe this is what the old trade unions used to support as well, before they became international socialists. They were once against immigration for the same sort of reasons too.

It has been reported that over 95% of all jobs created under Labour went to foreign nationals. Many British people have been put out of work, are looking for work, but cannot find work because immigrants are getting the jobs.

Some companies have even laid off staff and then employed 'cheaper' staff by the back door, some have had the sheer nerve to get the existing staff to train their replacements before they go.

This situation is often due to the fact that they are working for agencies, many of whom effectively exploit those workers and effectively undercut the viability of companies to employ indigenous citizens. It suits them both, but does not suit the indigenous people of the country.

If you work for an agency, which companies like because they do not have to pay them holidays or health insurance and can sack them off and employ more at their whim, you can often find that they can be paid up to £2 per hour less than indigenous workers. This is especially the case on production lines and in factories where they need not speak the language or speak to anybody else.

They will just work, and work, and work, in some cases without toilet breaks.

For example, an inquiry by the Equality and Human Rights Commission found evidence of there being shocking abuse in factories supplying major supermarkets, where some staff were working up to 90 hours a week in degrading conditions.

A fifth of workers questioned said they had been pushed, kicked or had things thrown at them, while a third had witnessed or been on the receiving end of verbal abuse.

Complaints included:

Line managers throwing frozen burgers at staff;

Pregnant women ended up miscarrying because they were told they would be sacked if they did not do heavy lifting or stand for long periods;

Workers forced to urinate on themselves because they were not allowed toilet breaks;

Working every day of the week with no days off, regularly totalling 90 hours with shifts lasting up to 18 hours;

Agency staff going around to workers' homes to make them come in on their day off.

The EHRC said some examples, such as forcing workers to do double shifts when ill or tired, were against the law and others were 'a clear affront to respect and dignity'.

Most of the mistreated workers - in firms supplying processed food to supermarkets - were migrants but British employees also suffered serious abuse.

THIS is NOT in OUR name OR with our BLESSING or CONSENT.

This is not even including the kinds of 'gang masters' that make people live "on site" in caravans in order to pick vegetables (which could be mechanised like in other more advanced countries) and rip them off, or the kinds of labour that led to the death of cockle pickers in Morecambe, Lancashire.

Surely you do not expect the British people to have to put up with sliding downwards to such situations too to make a living, because they would others be “lazy” and “unwilling to do the work that immigrants do”? Shame on you!

But, that extent aside, why are some of the indigenous people not prepared to do some of the work?

It is quite possibly because it is not worth their while to do so when they can, in some cases, get more by not working.

Some of our own people ARE idle- and we nationalists do NOT excuse them or support them. But, what about those who are NOT depictive of the TV show “Shameless”?

Who in their right mind would bust a gut in a hard environment for what could amount to perhaps another £50 per week? Factoring in things such as petrol costs, running a car, having to pay child care, and so on and so forth.

Child care costs are astronomical in this country, and I know from experience that it in some cases it has to be a conscious decision to "pursue" a career that makes some women return to the workplace because the near entirety of their pay packet is spent on nursery and child care fees.

Again, when it comes to furtherance and continuance of the indigenous British people – how is it possibly beneficial for us to have this situation where people forgo families for careers and trying to keep a basic to decent standard of living? Have you ever seen the introduction to the film “Idiocracy”?!

When it comes to the so called "work ethic" of foreign people, especially the much touted Eastern Europeans, it has to be remembered that the majority of these people have been receiving wages which are anywhere up to quadruple that they would have had in their country of origin.

They have to "make it" here in order to continue this, so naturally they will do what they can and 'put themselves out' doing whatever they can to remain. That is the "drive".

The money that they do earn though largely goes OUT of the country and back to theirs. How can this be good for the country here or in the interests of British people?

Why are we employing people from other countries to do work we often do not need, putting pressure on the infrastructure and having our own people out of work and then at the end of the day the revenue gained from it going abroad?

Why are we indigenous people, for theoretical example, importing a Somali family, one of whom might eventually get work in a Muslim Sari clothing shop, which has been built or furnished by Polish labour, who all went to the local Kebab/Fast Food place for their dinners whilst on construction?

How does this make sense for the future of the hosting indigenous British people?

It helps the Somali jump a standard of living by seven-fold over night and gives the family welfare and a roof, it helps the sari shop sell more Islamic garb to the increasing Islamic population of the area, keeps the corporate firms employing cheaper Polish staff happy, keeps their agencies happy, and the Somali and the Poles send excess money to another nation via Money Transfer Unions, often populated by foreign staff whose only business it is to remove money from this country.

Where do the British people fit in? Nowhere, as far as I can see it. We do not need ANY of it.

Immigrants come to the country, so they obviously do not own houses, do not have a mortgage, or all the other overheads we have. They often live 7 or more to a house and split the costs in a way which the indigenous worker could never compete with without lowering their standard of living to a degree which is not acceptable. How can you support this race to the bottom which will eventually put people out of their houses and working for a bowl of rice a week?

Numerous studies, most tellingly perhaps the House of Lords report on the matter, found that the supposed "financial benefit" to this country from immigration was next to zero. For anyone to say that immigration is boosting our economy or "paying for our pensions" is pure unadulterated bullshit.

Again, given this as being the case, how is it in the interests of the indigenous population?

Although we have had mass migration, it is a factual statement to say that the indigenous British are still proportionately the most productive and most employed sector of society. You even state yourself, in your own figures that 48% of black people, 31% of Asians etc are not in work.

Therefore, for whatever reason you care to ascribe to it - "racism" being a pretty pathetic one - it is the white indigenous population who are carrying the can and pulling the weight, and, as a result, paying for their own demise and own debasement from their own country.

Whilst we are doing this, we are even impoverishing ourselves and working so hard that we support African nations too, plus sending £Billions to India, Pakistan, and hundreds of others.

To say that, on the whole, the indigenous people are "lazy" and sat around on welfare is clearly idiotic therefore.

It is past waves of immigrants and their descendants who are not working - and in the case of some religious groups like Muslims, up to 40% of the women are not working and woefully uneducated.

But this case is not down to "racism" or "prejudice" - it is down to the fact that they are culturally different, more family oriented, more fecund and are at home looking after broods of children, often over 4 children.

This again, is not in the interests of the indigenous British people for obvious reasons - that they will eventually establish more Islamic featured societies and will slowly ethnically supplant the indigenous British from their own country, whilst we, in effect, pay for it to happen too.

When it comes to colleges and universities, it is a known fact that they charge more for foreign placements.

This is why many British people could not get into Universities, because it was making much more sense for the Universities to populate it with foreign students than our own. In Bristol’s chemistry department for example, non-EU students pay £14,750 a year compared with the £3,225 charged to British.

Institutions including Bristol, Edinburgh, Nottingham and Surrey are just a few of those Universities which are exploiting a government policy which puts no restrictions on the lucrative international student market, while imposing strict caps on British numbers. They are being allowed to advertise places in clearing as being available only to non-European Union students.

Large numbers of British students with good A-levels can’t get a place even while the universities are recruiting more from abroad than ever.

In the case of EU students, it was revealed this year that more than £250million a year of British taxpayers’ cash is blown on university education for students from other EU countries. Yes, whilst we cannot get places for umpteen reasons, we are then paying for other students to come!! Leftwing liberal students who like to moan and whine must have “kick-me” painted on their ignorant backsides.

All in all, it is therefore a bit ridiculous of you to cite the FALL in British applicants and the RISE in NON-EU students as being that the British -who are of ALL backgrounds - were "not up to it" or "too lazy".

I suggest you get your facts right and see the agendas being waged before you keep ignorantly mouthing off.

Plus, I would imagine that many of the people cited as officially "studying" in this country have never seen the inside of a college or university. A vast majority of so called "foreign students" on the government books are bogus and facilitated through bogus colleges.

Nobody denies, especially not racially aware Nationalists, that the Chinese and Japanese are, on the whole, diligent and dedicated students who value education and hard work.

They have, on average, a much higher IQ than that of whites, much like we have an average IQ higher to that of Blacks. That is why they tend to have much more successful societies, with lower crime rates and more honesty. Good for them!

One other thing to bear in mind is that you are generally talking to Nationalists here - NOT 'gutter racists', not imperialists, not colonialists, or anything else. You should learn the difference.

We believe that the education system in this country is, on the whole, woefully inadequate and that it has been purposefully destroyed in order to facilitate the kinds of changes we are seeing today.

It is a sad indictment, surely, that a nation which was once (rightly or wrongly) leading the world in educational attainment (and ruling over vast proportions of it), is now churning out a population – primarily thanks to liberal agendas and the “long march through the institutions” - who are not deemed properly educated or deemed fit for work.

It is not OUR fault, as nationalists, that this has happened, is it? Have we been in charge? Have we been influential in policy making? No.

The government and other institutions have failed in their duties, despite throwing billions of pounds at raising standards. Unfortunately, most of it went to crackpot liberalist agendas and throwing it away on PFI schemes. Bricks and mortar do not give a better education.

They have not been properly educating the public OR have they been adequately providing training and apprentice schemes to GIVE people the skills to be employed.

Why would a firm employ an apprentice, when they can get a cheaper immigrant whose home country has paid the price of their training? Why should they, from their perspective, give our folk day release to college and universities?

But what of that supposed lack of educational attainment? Are we not told that students are working harder than ever, are brighter than ever, and that with every year that passes we see more “A” and “A*” grades?

This has been happening for decades, according to the government........yet........we keep being told that we just do not have the education or skills, we do not have the basics of English, Maths or Science to get work and that immigrant workers are "needed"!

So which one is it? The liberal teaching methods since the 1960s has produced a highly educated British youth for the modern age, or that we are all dunces and we need to be replaced by the third world, who apparently must have better education and educational standards than this "first world" nation?

It cannot be BOTH at the same time. Well, not unless we indigenous people are being shafted up the backside at BOTH ends of the picture, which no doubt we are. Again, this is not in our interest is it?

I do not know what you expect us to say!

That we support general idleness and under education of the nation? That we support the reduction of our wages? That we should support the changing make-up of this country racially, culturally and religiously? That we support rampant globalism and meddling in other people's affairs? That we support exploitation of staff and the generation of a new "underclass" of foreigners that was wholly unnecessary and NOT welcomed by the general British people OR done in THEIR interests? That we should support “British Jobs for Non-British Workers”?

How ridiculous.

Have you any idea at all about what we are here for, other than your no doubt ridiculous assertions and assumptions that we are all "haters" of other races and "prejudiced on the basis melanin levels" and generally sat around on our arses swilling lager and watching Jeremy Kyle?

Get a clue, you anti-white racist.

-----------------------------------------------------

Response to slavery "within" Britain and by the British Empire.

This is Britain, not America. Fortunately, we did not saddle ourselves with the same slave problems as the united states by importing slaves into Britain.

We were not waited on hand and foot by blacks in this country, we did not have them working down the mines or on the fields, or anywhere else. It was our own people, often working in slave conditions, who built this country up. Nobody else.

In fact, we had virtually no Blacks here at all. The idea people seem to have that we had loads of slaves and general multi-racialism in this country is absurd.

The few "ethnic minorities" we did have knocking about were often not even proper residents, they were primarily stationed in the ports and docks as part of international trading companies passing through and waiting for ships and transport to return.

Some of them did linger on and stay, but a very tiny fraction. Even then, their limited presence was not wanted and it caused a few riots in the early late 19th and early 20th century.

The British people of the time would just not have put up with a mass presence of Blacks here, and nor were the vast majority of society here all chomping at the bit to support and partake in slavery.

As an example of the general reluctance to have non-whites in the land, the Queen of England in 1601 issued orders to expel all the non-whites who had "crept into the realme" - even though they were only thought to number a couple of hundred.

She said "there are of late blackmoores brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are all ready here to manie”.

She said that it would be “good pleasure to have those kinde of people sent out of the lande” - and issued orders to "transport them into Spaine and Portugall.”

A year or so later, when it became apparent that some of them had still remained, she again complained about the "numbers of Negars and Blackamoors which have crept into this realm …” and firmly had virtually all them rounded up and repatriated.

This was because "they are here to the great annoyance of [the queen’s] own liege people, that want the relief, which those people consume.”

It is false for anyone to claim that we had swathes of black slaves here, and the burden of providing evidence falls on yourself, not us.

We are not here to fall into the liberal trick of having to scratch around for hours and hours to try and provide evidence for somebody who is neither interested nor ever going to be willing to change their mind on our situation because of their own ethnic heritage circumstances.

The entity of the 'British Empire' may well have been involved in slavery, but the everyday populace of this country were not involved and nor were we deluged with slaves and partaking in slavery on these shores.

There may have been one or two very rare exceptions where rich aristocrats and former colonial settlers brought a few staff back as servants, but it would have been extremely rare indeed.

If you think about it, surely if we had any great legacy of blacks and slaves within this country over the span of hundreds of years, it would be obvious that the country would not have still been 99.8% white British in 1951.

Now that is a fact which you can look up in any serious demographical records and census records.

Many thousands on non-whites came to Britain soon after the war and especially after the 1948 Nationality Act. In 1951, just three years later, the estimated total of non-whites (of all types) was totalling 94,500. This in itself was causing a commotion. It was unprecedented.

The total demographic in 1951 was around 50 Million people. That therefore makes them around 0.18% of the populace. Say 0.2% to be fair. Britain was, as such, 99.8% white British. Essentially, near perfect homogeneous.

Now, we are less than 83% - where in the under five age group "ethnic minorities" in England and Wales are over 35% of the population. That is exactly the kind of trend which brings us here, just like it would for people in any other nation undergoing the same kind of situation.

When it comes back to slavery, Jewish traders were highly involved with the Transatlantic slave trade (I do not see much condemnation or self flagellation of them!), but I would say that the real historical slavers were predominantly Arabs/Muslims and black people themselves, slaving each other within their own lands and selling their own people off to be slaved elsewhere.

They were doing it centuries before we ever got there, and continued it long after we abolished it in the west and through the Empire. In that period alone, they were enslaving far greater numbers of people than "whites" ever did before they abolished it.

When it comes to their societies, the Arabs were so disgusted at the idea of there being mass interbreeding with the blacks and thus creating a demographic problem in the future because of their presence in their countries as slaves, that they used to castrate them or work them literally to death.

They were far more barbaric and inhumane than "we" ever were.

Slavery did not exist in a vacuum, the slave trade was not invented by Americans or Europeans. Even during the short period in which Europe and America were involved in slavery, they were not even the main players.

It is therefore certainly inequitable, and arguably racist, to hold one group more accountable than another on the grounds of their race. It is positively wicked to do this in order to help usher in ethnocidal mass immigration -which you and others here seem to be doing on a repeated basis.

You can not single out one or two nations for unique condemnation, when, in truth they merely, and briefly, got involved in what almost everyone else was doing, and which other nations had been doing for thousands of years.

This is particularly inequitable given that, in 1807, Britain was one of the fist nations on planet earth to abolish the slave trade and then (through the Empire) brought about the abolition of slavery across a quarter of the earth's surface by a mere 26 years later.

This is a stunning achievement, given that the British Empire included many lands where slavery had been a fact of life for thousands of years, and that this huge task was achieved in an age before aeroplanes, helicopters and satellite communications. It cost this country a fortune to abolish slavery, more than we had ever supposedly gained from it.

It is time to put this whole "slavery" guilt trip to bed.

People pull it out like it is some kind of liberal Kryptonite to make us wither away - but we are immune to it!

There is nothing you, or anybody else can say about slavery which will excuse what is going on today, or make it right in any way

----------------------------------------------------

Response to economic collapse not being about race in any way etc.

Amber, unfortunately you do not seem to understand the point which was being made about the global recession.

DuskRelic is (rightly) talking about the multi-racialism, multiculturalism, "political correctness" and the 'strong-arming' of the lunatics in the "race industry" which triggered off the actual collapse, because of their flawed beliefs and dogmatic agenda.

It not unsurprising that you do not seem to know about this though, because you are not likely to ever, ever hear it discussed or pointed out on the BBC or other British media outlets, because they are notoriously biased both in their output and (often more importantly) what they do not include as their output.

Therefore, he is not saying that the "recession is about brown people!", he is not "generalising" or saying the affect of the economy has not hit all sectors of society.

Sadly, that is the typical kind of "knee jerk" and "ignorant" liberal reaction which people have been trained to express, because the horse blinkers are placed on their eyes and they therefore cannot seem to appreciate that it may not be our "ignorance" which lay behind some of our statements and positions, but their own.

People who do it are a product of the system; it is not all their own fault. They live inside a manufactured bubble, like the sci-fi film The Matrix.

As they often do not "understand" what we are talking about and what our positions are, they will naturally see "no sense" in them.

They then go on to project from their own ignorance that the people who hold such views as ours are therefore the "ignorant" ones that "make no sense" and that we must therefore be simple "bigots", "racists" and "haters" with "small minds" etc.

Despite being quite ironic, it can be both infuriating and hilarious at times too.

What he is talking about is relating to the factors (and insane liberal 'circular thinking') which brought the collapse in the first place. I shall try and explain.

Okay, I will try and fill you in and give you some examples, starting with a parallel from our own Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats and how his sort of thinking has been causing so many problems in most of the white western world.

Nick Clegg, only recently, was discussing the "racist" discrepancy in lending to some BME groups and how there needed to be changes in society and regulations to stamp this "discriminatory" discrepancy out, amongst other things. He talked about an "iron fist" being needed.

He said that the “next frontier for race equality” is opening up economic opportunities to ethnic minorities. An inquiry into bank lending, led by Andrew Stunell and Lynne Featherstone, was said to be a start.

"Well, what is wrong with that?" you may ask, right?

Well......let us head off to America, to hear some words from president Obama when he was discussing the "Occupy Wall Street Movement" in recent weeks.

Obama complained that the Occupy Wall Street protests showed a “broad-based frustration” among Americans with the financial sector - and how they were "seeing some of the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on the abusive practices that got us into this in the first place,”

Again, you might say "What is wrong with that?" - It sounds like your normal politician speak, doesn't it? Because, of course, there was a whole cross section of people borrowing too much and banks were irresponsibly lending out money at ridiculous rates of repayment, like you say yourself.

But what if some sectors of society were borrowing more than others? What if banks started to get reckless because they were eventually happily cooking the books for this end, because they were 'making money' out of debt and foreclosures?

What if, just like Nick Clegg's two dimensional and circular thinking, the pandering and the agenda of "equality" and "race relations" caused a catastrophe?

What if the U.S Government and political liberal elite encouraged, even invented, those “abusive practices” they are now claiming to condemn?

In 1994, President Clinton's federal government declared war on an enemy. This was the "racist" lender—who officials claimed was to blame for differences in home ownership rate. As a result, they launched what would prove to be the costliest "social engineering" crusade in the history of the United States.

(Clinton, by the way, despite being white, is an avowed anti-white racist - but I will leave that to one side for now).

Under Clinton’s direction, 10 federal agencies issued a chilling ultimatum to banks and mortgage lenders to ease credit for lower-income minorities or face investigations for lending discrimination and suffer the related adverse publicity of being labelled "racists".

They also were threatened with denial of access to the all-important secondary mortgage market and stiff fines, along with other penalties. All this was done to "end racism", "end discrimination", to make things "fair". All the same kind of socialist garbage platitudes we hear all the time.

The threat issued to lenders was codified in a 20-page “Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending” and entered into the Federal Register on April 15, 1994, by the Interagency Task Force on Fair Lending.

Clinton set up this little-known body to coordinate an unprecedented crackdown.

The edict— which has been completely overlooked by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission and the mainstream media—was signed by then U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Henry Cisneros, Attorney General Janet Reno, Comptroller of the Currency Eugene Ludwig and Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, along with the heads of six other financial regulatory agencies.

The whole thing was predicated on a Boston Fed (The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston) study showing that mortgage lenders were rejecting blacks and Hispanics in greater proportion than whites.

The author of the 1992 study, (**who was hired by the Clinton White House**), claimed it was down to racial “discrimination.” But it was simply good underwriting.

It did not take private analysts (as well as at least one Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation economist) a lot of time to determine the Boston Fed study was terminally flawed, including finding embarrassing mistakes in the data.

They concluded that more relevant measures of a borrower’s credit history—such as past delinquencies and whether the borrower met lenders credit standards—explained the gap in lending between whites and blacks, who on average had poorer credit and higher defaults.

The study did not take into account a host of other relevant data factoring into denials, including applicants’ net worth, debt burden and their employment record either.

Other variables, such as the size of down payments and the amount of the loans sought to the value of the property being bought, also were left out of the analysis.

It also failed to consider whether the borrower submitted information that could not be verified, the presence of a co-signer and even the loan amount.

When these missing data were factored in, it became clear that the rejection rates were based on legitimate and sound business decisions, *NOT* racism.

Still, even though this was pointed out (although not particularly publicised in the media because it is fraught with difficulty due to racial truths) - the study was used to support a wholesale abandonment of traditional underwriting standards which was the root cause of the mortgage crisis that caused the financial collapse.

Banks that failed to throw open their lending to these minorities were denied expansion plans by the Federal Reserve. They were threatened with being shunned from key aspects of operating their services. The Justice Department sued them for lending discrimination and branded them as "racists" in the press.

A "witch-hunt" of this kind can be seen all the time, can it not?

The banks were warned that even unintentional discrimination was against the law, and that they should be proactive in making “multicultural” loans.

Now, when confronted with the combined force of 10 federal regulators, lenders naturally toed the line, and were soon aggressively marketing "sub-prime" mortgages in "BME" areas.

It took a little more than a decade for the negative (and compounding) effects to be felt.

In 2006, the shaky sub-prime mortgages began to default. In 2008, the bubble exploded. This is when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (and a few others) collapsed, causing a chain reaction not only in America, but around the world.

The "left" went on a crusade of "equality" for their ideological ends. The banks, though at first reluctant, were fed into this system and became hooked on it. This is because money was being generated from debt. They "magic" the money out of nowhere and it ends up on the computer screen as assets. It made them look good.

Some account executives within banks earned a commission seven times higher from sub-prime loans, rather than prime mortgages. So, they purposefully looked for less savvy borrowers—those with less education, without previous mortgage experience, or without fluent English—and nudged them toward subprime loans. They ended up paying a higher rate so that they were more likely to lose their homes.

In a way, although I doubt it was colluded in this instance - It is perhaps yet another example of Cultural Marxism working with Corporate Fascism. One does it for one reason; the other does it for another.

We nationalists object to both.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to somebody who thought the Tram Lady should be locked up for what she said, because Racism should not be tolerated, and how it is racist to say indigenous British people are white.

So you think people should be locked away in prison for merely having and expressing a different opinion and viewpoint to yours.........well, errm, how "tolerant" and "liberal" you are!

Well done! You must be very proud!

What's next? That they should be shot in the back or starved to death like Stalin’s regime murdered 7 million Ukrainians and sent 2 million to concentration camps for not having the right outlooks and opinions for his international communist and "equal" society aims and ambitions?

Then you clap and cheer the ethnocide of your own people from their own homeland and idiotically deny they even exist. Wow. Such hatred and wickedness in your heart.

How does it feel to help promote genocide and be a general racial and cultural nihilist?

If you want to look at who is the wickedest, I suggest you therefore find yourself a mirror.

Do you extend this hatred and nihilistic tendencies for all ethnic groups and all nations, or just our own?

Does "any" group in the world "exist" or have the right to self determination and ethnic continuation in your view?

I am just curious, because you do seem like the very kind of anti-white racist who would only apply this concept to white nations and cry blue murder if it was happening the other way around to anybody else.

The indigenous people of Europe are Caucasians. That means white.

The indigenous people of Britain are therefore white, no ifs, no buts or maybe. It is not "racist" to state such an obvious fact. The British, the Britons, composite of England, Wales, Scotland, Cornwall, etc are therefore white.

Others who have come since the formation of the individual nations (and the political union of them known as Britain) are only "British Citizens", simply because they RESIDE in Britain. Learn the difference. Nobody denies they are British "citizens" and nobody denies them the same rights and protection as anybody else on that basis.

I bet you even subscribe to the idea that we are a "mongrel race" and a "mongrel nation" and that "race is a societal construct anyway" or "just skin tone and melanin levels" - lol - such is the usual type of ignorance from these types of responses.

As for the word and accusation of being "racist" - a common theme throughout these replies - do you even know where it came from in its most influential form, and for what ends it was manufactured and used?

Let me fill you in, because it appears that you do not know. Or perhaps you do know and are just being coy because you support that very same agenda!

It was a tool and a concept coined by Leon Davidovich Bronstein - otherwise known as Leon Trotsky - one of the principal architects of the 74-year Soviet nightmare and the founder and first leader of the infamous Red Army in 1930 that butchered multiple millions of people.

He used it to destroy the first people who were in his way of creating his utopian visions. People who he called the "Slavophiles". (A bit similar to we "Anglophiles" in your view then, I suppose!)

These Slavophiles were a group of traditionalist Slavs who valued greatly their native culture and way of life, and simply wanted to protect it.

Trotsky on the other hand saw them (and others like them) as an impediment to his internationalist communist plans for the world. He didn't give a damn about the Slavic Russians whom he supposedly served.

To him, Slavophiles, i.e. Slavs that committed the "crime" of loving their own people and trying to protect their traditional ways were simply "backward", and others like them were simply "racists" and "bigots".

Is this sounding at all familiar?

The left-liberal version of the story is that the word was coined legitimately to identify people who were just plain bigoted against certain racial groups, and that the word was essential for good liberals to use to protect the racial minorities from the bigots.

However, the actual concept behind the word was that ethnocentric "backwardness" must take a back seat to "enlightened" internationalism.

Therefore it was often used by Commissar Trotsky as a rallying cry for good Red Army communists to embark upon murderous rampages against peoples who resisted having their traditional way of life paved over and replaced with an alien system.

Any of this sounding even more familiar to our situation yet? It should be.

It probably is, and you are probably a willing participant in it, like most of the Red trolls rocking up here!

The same thing is therefore still happening now, the only differences are that the word's targets have expanded from just Slavs who won't submit to the Marxist internationalist plan to uproot and destroy their culture and traditional way of life, to all white people, Slavic or otherwise, who won't submit to that same vile Marxist plan.

This plan is as intended by the School of Frankfurt to destroy Western civilisation from within. One of their first ambitions was enact "racism" offences and silence dissent.

Also, the difference is that those who now arm themselves with the word have expanded from a handful of communists to the entire liberal and neo-conservative establishment in nations all across the Western world, including "useful idiots" like yourself - a description used by them, to define you and what you are doing.

Leon Trotsky has done more damage to the West than Stalin could ever hope for, because he invented a word that would empower the most rotten, traitorous weasels within the West to redefine those who are loyal to their people, their cultural traditions and way of life as the worst evil - and to send the government, the education system, and the mass media on an absolute royal crusade to expunge themselves, their civilisation and their people.

When bolstered with constant revisionist history that is fabricated by more of the same kind of rotten weasels who falsely portray the white man as the sole perpetrator of slavery and genocide in the world, they desired it would go on until the West would submit (via demoralisation and fracture) to the entire Trotskyist internationalist agenda without a single shot being fired.

We resist this, and resist your ignorance which is furthering a sick and twisted agenda that masquerades as being "good" and "righteous".

Emma West, the EDL and that sort of more crude and 'basic' reaction to this are products of YOUR kind of agenda. They are only there, existing and doing what they do because of what has happened to this country at the hands of liberal fools like yourself!

I am not of the EDL, and I am not like Emma West. But is their annoyance and frustration sometimes justified and understandable? I think it is. It is not what I would do, but an action is bound to have a counter-reaction like this at some point.

-------------

Possibly to be continued........

What a mystery.......

2011-11-28T17:55:00.002Z

Just a little news from the Daily Mail today regarding the disappearance of community spirit within our nation.

Apparently, a survey was undertaken by Nissan Motors in order to find "unsung heroes who have performed random acts of kindness".

The result of this study, according to the Daily Mail, is that 70% admit they don't know who lives next door, only 6% say community spirit is strong in their area and 51% wouldn't ask their neighbour for help.

The main reason given for the decline is "lack of time to meet those in the community", but quite frankly I find that to be a pretty preposterous excuse - something that one would give to pollsters to cover up other reasons.

In many cases, especially in southern inner cities, people have often been neighbours for over 20 years and still do not know their names or have even spoken to them.

I also believe that much of it due to a general decline in what used to bind us as a society....such as where whole streets, or almost whole towns in some cases, worked at the same few factories or shipyards. I bet the sound of clogs tapping down the cobbled streets could often be deafening. Now, we get in a car and in some cases drive 30 miles to work.

Also, thanks to a planned and purposeful rotting of our institutions, pass times, cultural events, sense of history and our previous religious rigour, we do not meet our neighbours to go on Whitsun Marches, Easter Parades, do the Maypole or a proper Guy Fawkes Night (currently known as "Bonfire Night" for most people).

Working mens clubs have been shutting, the "turns" they had on have largely vanished, as have the ballroom dancing clubs (up until recent TV inspired revival, perhaps). Computers have arrived, insular lifestyles have arrived - of which I myself have fallen victim.

So, yes, some of that move away from societal cohesiveness and neighbourliness is to be expected in a 'modern' fast paced and hard-nosed society which fits many an inner city area - but is it the whole picture? What else might be going on? What might also be playing a part in our "hunkering down" and tortoise-like view of our homes and the "other world" outside of it?

The article states:

The main reason given for the decline in neighbourly relations was lack of time available to meet those in the community. More than 40 per cent admitted that they had never had the chance to speak to those living less than 6ft from their front door.

David Jamilly, founder of Kindness UK says: 'Kindness and kind acts, towards people, animals, nature and the environment, are what make the difference between a "me society" and a "we community".'

Now, call me an unreconstructed old cynic if you like - but let me offer my opinion on something which may be a major part of this scenario.

Now, I know it is a wild and crazy suggestion, really well and truly 'off the wall' and utterly beyond all comprehension to most 'think tanks', MP's, charities and such.....

.....but.......

.......do you think that the importation of something like 6 Million people from all around the world that are festooning our towns and cities in some sort of rebuilding of the tower of Babel (and now being a "community of communities" rather than "a community") just might have something to do with it?

I know, I know, it sounds really insane doesn't it. How on Earth could the utter destruction of community identity via an implantation of a cacophony of languages, races, religions and cultures ever have such an impact on what used to be a much more friendly and civilised country - if not once the most civilised and safe country in the entire world?

It really is a mystery isn't it?

However, I wonder if anyone else may have thought of it? After all, this phenomena might just be a factor in it.

It might also be a factor in the loss of "social capital" just as we all witness with our very eyes (and through the extensive research of liberal sociologist Robert Putnam).

Yes, I know that was a study which was done in another country, and it could not possibly happen here because , well, "this is Britain!" - but maybe, just maybe, it is worth a look into?

You know, I really would like to get to know my nation's usurpers and interlopers that reside in my town, but the thing is, I really just cannot seem to 'find the time'.

If only I had more time, I could enjoy the wonders they bring to my people and my country - and congratulate them (and the last seven or eight governments) on really pulling this country out of the complete shit it was in before they arrived and made it so much better for us all.

I could visit the mosque, have a little kick around at football with mini-Mohammed down the road. They could send me a samosa (vegetarian for me of course) and I could send them a non-pork based meat pie. All would then be marvellous in the world. All my issues and concerns would suddenly flutter away.

Funnily enough though - well, you know how it is - I have too many things to do - like watching paint dry, cutting my toe-nails and re-ordering my CD collection from that of 'genre' to that of being in alphabetical order.

I just cannot find the time for 'community events', much like the vast majority of other Britons (and indeed the interlopers themselves).

But what is this other report I see?{see link}

Oh dear, oh dear. This will never do. It seems that the British people are getting a little bit disenfranchised with society, the government elites and the ethnic minorities being pandered to.

The (left-leaning) Joseph Rowntree Foundation has discovered that there might be a sense of alienation within the white working classes.

I know! I know! What on Earth could have brought this on? What a shock and surprise! These people really must have their finger on the pulse to spot this one coming through the net.

You know, upon reading this, I'm now starting to wonder whether it might also have something to do with the other story and that it may stem from the same causation......

....I know, it is wild and wacky, but could 60 years of liberalism and liberal immigration policy (which has recently seen 5 million people arrive unasked by the indigenous white working classes) have any bearing on this sense of disenfranchisement?

Maybe the fact that they were never asked and that nothing is ever done about their objections to it has rendered them a little bit cynical and distrusting of the government and ruling elites?

I'm just throwing these wild ideas out, you know, just in case. Somebody has to try and solve these mysteries as to why this kind of thing is happening to this country after all.

So, what they are suggesting for fixing this disenfranchisement and disconnection....(and it ties nicely into the neighbourliness study of the Nissan group)......is that we have more "street parties" to get to know each other. Yay! Everybody likes a party.

That's right. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation suggested street parties were a good way to build community links.

Crack open those tupperware bowls and the samosa mix, I'm coming!!!........after I have sorted my woodscrew jars into category by length and width, and vacuumed out the unsightly car boot fluff, that is.

Rather than being spontaneous and natural, we are now having companies monitor and assess our societal decline in order to congratulate things which were once taken as a given in our societies......and seeing liberal policy groups like the JRF wanting to encourage un-natural and somewhat forced street events so we can all jolly well get on like a nation on fire......oh, hang on! I mean 'house on fire'......(or do I?).

So what is it that seems to worry the JRF about this disintegrating state of affairs?

Are they innocent bystanders just tutting over their 'fair trade' muesli at this mysterious sense of 'perceived' grievance and loss of community spirit?......hmmn......I wonder.......well, what does the article say in the paper?:

However, the white working classes remain proud of their identity and the values they stand for. These include working hard, looking after each other and having pride in their community.

Oh right.....would that be those very same 'racist' white working classes who we have all been told for three decades or more (by these kinds of organisations and government elites) 'do not want to work' and have 'no pride in their community'? Could be!

The research, published today, also criticised previous studies on community cohesion for focusing too much on ethnic minorities rather than the area they lived in as a whole.

Clunk-click.

That is the sound of these groups changing tracks from one of open "multiculturalism" to the one of the recent "muscular liberalism" Cameron-Merkel-Sarkozy inspired "one-ness" through multiculturalism in order to get funding and backing.

They, and those like them, apparently made a 'mistake' by ramming this ethnic stuff down our throats all the time because it is looking like the host community is starting to get a little cheesed off.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation called for the allocation of resources such as social housing to be done 'transparently', in order to tackle accusations of unfairness and let people see how the system actually works.

Oh right, they need to tackle the "accusations" of unfairness......not actually do anything about what is happening and continuing to happen to this country.......just so that we are clear.

The white working classes clearly need to be educated and reassured that their country is not being colonised, especially not colonised at their expense. Throw them a few bones to keep them happy, and all will be tickety-boo.

They also highlighted the usefulness of street parties, festivals and places such as schools, pubs and shops when it comes to building better community links.

Oh....would that be the greatly celebrated British festivals like the ones Labour spent so much money on and then later wanted to hijack for their own perverse social engineering ends?

Would that be the schools which are brimming with blacks and asians and foreign parents from around the globe? The pubs that are shut, turned into mosques or priced/taxed out of business? The shops that are either Asian owned corner shops, the "Pound-Lands" or boarded up shops that have shut due to high rental prices and the new out-of-town Tesco?

Or are these pontificating twits living in the Cotswold's, Harrogate, and Whitey-Upon-Sea?

They said that any initiatives shouldn't just be aimed at white working class people, but rather communities as a whole, in order to deliver the best results.

Sorry Whitey.......I know we have been running ethnic orientated things for years, but now, now you are getting a bit restless, I think it is only fair that we continue to do this under the guise of it being for the "whole community" so that you feel included.

We could have offered some 'all white' funding, but you know, that is a bit racist and we would never live it down.

Findings by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation also revealed that officials often 'raised hopes' of residents during consultations about council houses but ultimately left them feeling 'let down.'

I know we used to give you white folk SOME hope of getting on the housing ladder, despite your number ticket slipping gradually down the table as your new Nigerians and Somali neighbours arrive endlessly......and we can clearly see that offering you such hopes (and 'kidding you' in order to massage away your resentment) is no longer working.

Instead, to solve this sense of disenfranchisement, what we are going to do is offer you no hope at all.

That way, you will not be so disappointed when you see Jamaal Mbubonga and Iftikah Hussein move in to the four bedroom dwelling down the road.

You could commiserate yourself by having a street party and welcoming them to the neighbourhood. That might make you feel a little bit better. We are here to help, after all.

Harris Beider, the author of the report, said: 'The way that people from working class white backgrounds are portrayed is often negative, which doesn't reflect the reality of the pride most hold in their community, nor their strong work ethic, and collective values.

'It is important to confound the negative stereotypes and understand that people in these communities feel their voices are not listened to, and that they have no stake in their community.

'They want to be valued, heard and connected to government.'

Chief-executive Julia Unwin CBE added: 'We know there are real concerns that many people in traditional white working-class areas are becoming increasingly disconnected with the political system and feel their views, experiences and interests are ignored by policy makers.

'This research highlights the real potential we have to grasp opportunities to engage with and support many of those who feel let down and '"last in line".'

In other words......

"We are currently papping our pants that society is getting restless and that a combination of issues are leaving a void that is fertile for the 'far right' and serious community violence in the 'down turn'.

Therefore, we need to follow the advice of liberal sociologists and experts on the 'far right' potential (like Matthew Goodwin's recent Chatham House publication) and start massaging the white working class ego, and make them "feel" like their voices are listened to even though we really could not give a rats ass and have no intention of actually doing anything at all about their concerns in reality.

If we can fool them with this new 'muscular liberalism' approach for long enough, it might just keep them in the mainstream long enough for full transformation to occur without conflict.

They need to feel "connected" with the political system that has thus far sought to disembowel their country and strip them of their birthright - and that they are not being ignored or put 'last in line' - otherwise a new Mr Hitler could come along and undo all our hard work eradicating white civilisation from Britain.

Hmmn. Cynical......moi?! Sûrement pas!... ...me siguri nuk!.... ....নিশ্চয় না!... ..当然不是!.. ...நிச்சயமாக இல்லை!...... .....kesinlikle değil !

Feeling Charitable?

2011-11-20T16:55:00.004Z

One of the sad resultants of being "nationalistically inclined" is the lack of trust that I now have when it comes to charities of all stripes.

It is not all that long ago when I used to loathe people who did not contribute to charities. Now, I am the one who does not really give to any.

The only exceptions I still have are; giving whatever loose change (up to a couple of pound) for the Royal British Legion in November for a poppy (or as they tend to say now, "The Legion").......and the 'forced' charity I am giving through government grants and in foreign aid programmes via my taxes. I am stupid enough to still be in a National Lottery syndicate at work too.

Even then, when it comes to buying a poppy, although I still like to pay some kind of homage to the dead of this nation for their sacrifice and trauma (despite my unease about the first and second word wars, the resultant from it, the case for it etc), I am getting reluctant to keep on doing this when it is increasingly the case that all conflicts we seem to have been involved with since the Falklands have continued to have been spurious, neo-conservative and in the interests of others, etc.

It is getting like the old adage of "loathe the sin, love the sinner", where I would like to see my own people "done right by" and am thankful for their courage etc - but annoyed at the escapades they find themselves embroiled in and brainwashed into carrying out. Primarily though, I think of my grandfathers and the men and women of this country who made it what it was and who gave themselves, so they thought, to protect it.

When it comes to general charity, at an early age I was imbibed with the sense of doing good deeds for charity. This was to the usual point where I did things many children do......such as collecting for charities as part of my Sunday School youth, bringing tins (and such) to school for thanksgiving harvests, doing the whole comic relief thing and children in need thing, plus various others which came along through the years.

I remember things at my secondary school, such as a missionary giving a "special talk" - somebody who had been helping 'poor Africans' in Tanzania. We schoolchildren then helped raise more money for Africa as a result.

I would not say I was ever some kind of charity giving guru. I did not bust a gut, but I subbed in my pocket money, did a few odd jobs to raise a bit of extra pocket money, contributed tins and packets of food, put money in various buckets for comic relief (buying the various red noses over the years), non-uniform day, and that kind of thing.

I remember thinking of the people who did not give anything as being "mean", "hateful" and "selfish". I hated them. "How can you not afford a little something for the starving babies in Africa", I thought. Once again, youthful liberalism made me put emotion before logic and understanding. I knew nothing of the world or how it worked.

Now, through what I have learnt about the world and the negative impact of such charities, such as how it makes (and has made) many problems worse, how demographics are going to end up, how various charities are nothing more than communist front organisations serving a globalist agenda, how charities are often working to undermine my own country and my own people.........it has made me one of those people I always used to hate as a child.

Now that I see ourselves in this global game, this national survival game, this self survival game of my race and my people, my tune has changed towards charities -even the ones which are supposedly British or "British themed" like Children In Need.

They now make it clear on the TV broadcasts that the money raised cannot be diverted to be used abroad and that it is all for use in the United Kingdom. It almost sounds patriotic doesn't it, tapping into the public who are fed up with our own poor and needy being sidelined and who subscribe to the 'charity begins at home' ethos .......but, quite honestly, do people really know where it is going, even in this country?

I know it makes me very hard hearted - but I have become determined to cease helping the funding of our own demise as a people in this kind of way.

When, or if, we see a reversal in our national decline, I may well contribute to things once again. Until that point, I am going to remain sceptical, distrusting and - as the opposition would no doubt say - "hateful" and "bigoted".

If those are the labels which must be applied in order for me to try and resist our replacement as a people here in Britain and Europe, then so be it. I can live with myself. I have a clean conscience. We have been one of the most altruistic races on the planet and given much more to the world than we have ever received back.

If I was going to give to charity, I would do it on a local basis or towards something specific that I know for a fact is legitimate and beneficial to my own people in some way.

Much of the need for charity in this country is - in my opinion -somewhat self inflicted anyway, especially at the hands of mass migration and liberal social policies.

We have seen increased poverty in society (via immigration, blacks, Asians), lack of stable parenthood (often black men leaving their children and increased divorce rates), drug abuse getting rife (at the hands of black and Asian drug pushers), myriads of "ethnic" themed charities for "integration" and "refugee awareness" programmes. None of which we ever really needed before c.1960.

So, when Children In Need rocks up every year - I am feeling less than charitable these days. It is all "feel good stuff" - but I cannot even bring myself to watch it on the television. The smug-fest gets irritating.

Yes, the bulk of it probably does go to some very needy children - probably truly British children who deserve help and support - but unfortunately, much of it does not and I cannot bear being made "a chump" out of via financing programmes and groups which are not in my peoples or my nations interests. I guess I am living proof of Robert Putnam's observations on 'social capital'.

I spotted elsewhere that somebody posted up a link to the Children in Need funding site, so I decided to read through the linked PDF documents which noted where the money was being allocated.

I have taken the time and trouble of wading through the majority of them (not all of them) to pick out some of the most obvious examples of what I am talking about.

If you were pro-British and under an illusion that your charity money was going to little British children who had fallen on hard times etc, then you are probably in for a wake up call when I list some of the places it has gone to.

Whilst some of them may be 'deserving cases' for bleeding hearts and some tragic situations, unfortunately the rights of my people to survive in their own homeland have to come first. If we are to help them at all, it should be in their own homeland - not mine. Especially when our acts of 'kindness' are slowly turning this country into a basket case and hell hole.

For the sake of "charity", I have tried not to include ones for genuine disabilities and the disabled, even though some of those charities are obviously specifically targeted at their own ethnic people's advancement.

Here we go, from what I gather was last years Children In Need:-

-------------------------------------------------------

Harrow Association of Somali Voluntary Organisations - Harrow - £9,624

"This project will run a holiday club for young people from the Somali community which will involve creative writing, sports and arts".

Horn of Africa Youth Association - Hayes - £16,500

The project will provide support to children from an asylum seeker and refugee background, specifically around housing and employment.

Sahan Society Centre - Hayes - £51,230

This project will provide a support service to children with special educational needs and their families, who are from the Somali community.

Somali Community Advancement Organisation - London - £5,850

This project will provide weekend lessons in Maths, English and Science for young people from the Somali or other East African communities, who face a range of disadvantage and who are struggling at school

Crossworld FC - London - £6,130

This project will provide football training for young asylum seekers and refugees to improve their health and well being.

African Cultural Association Barnet - London - £6,135

This project will provide cultural activities for disadvantaged young people including arts and crafts, jewellery making, textiles and design.

West London Moroccan Widadia - London - £8,372

This project will provide a homework club and reading support to young people from the Moroccan community who are struggling at school.

Shire Foundation - London - £8,835

This project will work with children and young people from low income families. Through drumming, drama and dance workshops they hope to increase their confidence and self esteem while also encouraging them to engage with the local community.

Ivorian and African French Speaking Women Action Group - London - £9,000

Through providing music workshops and tuition, this project will promote positive relationships between children and young people from other cultural backgrounds who face a range of disadvantage.

African Womens Care - London - £9,500

This project will provide a programme of support to young people who have experienced some form of personal abuse or domestic violence.

Wings Of Hope Community Association London £9,910

This project will deliver sporting activities, dance sessions and healthy living advice at weekends for disadvantaged young people from the North African community.

YouthSpace - London - £10,000

This project will provide a two week residential for young boys from the orthodox Jewish community who live in over crowded conditions and who would not otherwise have this opportunity.

Beis Rochel Community Group - London - £10,000

This project will provide a summer holiday activity programme for girls from the Orthodox Jewish community who wouldn't otherwise have this opportunity.

Voice 4 Somali - London - £10,000

This project will provide regular weekend classes to improve the educational attainment of young people from the Somali community who are failing at school.

African Women Group - London - £10,000

This project will provide a weekly homework club for girls of African origin who face a range of disadvantage and are struggling at school.

Bromley Somali Community Association - London - £26,854

This project will provide supplementary classes for children and young people from low income Somali families who are struggling at school. This will enable them to improve their educational attainment, aspirations and self confidence.

Somali and Somaliland Lewisham Community - London - £27,600

Through the provision of supplementary classes this project will help children and young people who are struggling at school to improve their numeracy, literacy and increase their self confidence.

Helping Hands Support Association - London - £28,101

This project will provide tuition in English, Maths and Science for children and young people from ethnic minority backgrounds and who are underachieving at school.

Dalgarno Neighbourhood Trust - London - £28,989

This project will provide classes in drama, photography and video, music and art for disadvantaged young people who not otherwise have the opportunity to attend such activities.

Bikur Cholim Dsatmar Trust (Home Hospital Link) - London - £52,300

This project will provide support to children and young people primarily from the Jewish community, who have a family member or sibling with an illness or disability.

Uganda Community Relief Association - London - £61,100

This project will work with children and young people with HIV or AIDS through the provision of creative, sporting and leisure activities and supportive information to help them plan positively for the future and increase their confidence.

Fashion and Development Centre - Southall - £10,000

This project will match young mentors with young people from refugee backgrounds to support them with their school work and help them achieve their goals for the future.

Blessing Family Association - Thornton Heath - £9,405

Through the provision of supplementary classes this project will help to integrate refugee children and young people into mainstream schools, improve their numeracy, literacy and increase their self confidence.

Nekh Welfare Foundation - Barking - £9,000

This project will provide after-school classes for young people from ethnic minority communities in East London, to address issues of truancy, underachievement and language barriers at school.

Midaye Somali Development Network - London - £4,868

This project will provide Saturday supplementary classes for children and young people from low income Somali families in Kensington and Chelsea.

Hackney Playbus - London - £9,101

The Hackney Playbus will provide a range of activities for children from the traveller community in East London, giving them somewhere safe to play and helping them to access local services.

Bengali International - London - £9,660

This project will provide recreational activities in a safe setting for young people living on a deprived estate in East London.

St Peter's Community and Advice Centre - London - £9,875

This project will provide healthy eating advice and sports sessions for girls from the Bangladeshi community living in low income families in East London.

Yismach Moshe Community Group London £10,000

This project will provide a 12 day summer holiday programme for boys, aged 0-15, from low income Orthodox Jewish families, living in Hackney.

SAIL (Summer Adventure for Inner Londoners) - London - £10,000

This project will provide a 2 week residential holiday to Manchester for100 young males, aged 13-16, who are from low income Orthodox Jewish families living in Hackney and Haringey.

Baraka Youth Association London £18,300

This project will provide supplementary Maths & English classes, football and swimming sessions, for children and young people from refugee and asylum-seeking families in Kensington and Chelsea.

Community Music Ltd. - London - £20,238

This project will provide music lessons for Bengali and Bangladeshi young people living in deprived communities in East London.

Sierra Leone Refugee Welfare Association London £25,950

This project will provide an after-school club for children from refugee communities to help support them with their education and integration in to the UK.

Kongolese Centre For Information & Advice - London - £28,094

This project will provide Saturday sporting activities for children and young people from refugee and asylum seeking communities in Westminster, enabling them to become physically active and improve
their communication skills.

Marylebone Bangladesh Society - London - £29,585

This project will provide a supplementary school for children and young people from low income Bangladeshi families in Westminster.

Klevis Kola Foundation London £44,025

This project will provide an afterschool club for children and young people from refugee and asylum seeking families, living in Wandsworth, Lambeth and Merton, in order to improve their emotional
and social wellbeing.

J.A.N Trust - London - £60,100

This project will provide English and Maths classes as well as creative writing, art classes, confidence building and day trips for children from Bangladeshi, Somali and Pakistani communities.

Roma Support Group - London - £80,962

This project will provide support to Roma children in East London, encouraging them to attend school and providing after-school activities to improve their self-esteem and confidence.

Addington Afro-Ethnic Health Promotion Group - Croydon - £29,414

This project will provide a range of activities for young carers from asylum seeking/refugee families affected by illness and poverty. It will give them a break from their caring duties, reduce isolation, and improve confidence and self-esteem.

Friendship Society - Erith - £21,000

This project will provide a range of educational and leisure activities for children from eastern European families, improving educational attainment and language skills, helping them integrate into British society with more ease.

Muslim Womens Assn - Southwark - London £2,740

This project will provide day trips for children from the Muslim community, most of whom are recent arrivals to the UK, some seeking asylum, and some from low income families. They hope to develop confidence, language skills and well being.

International Youth Centre - London - £5,668

The project will provide workshops and outings for young refugees from French-speaking Africa. This will give them the opportunity to learn about the natural environment, wildlife and it's conservation and develop new skills and knowledge.

Gascoyne & Morningside Youth Clubs - London - £10,000

This project will provide a youth club on two deprived estates for young people aged 8-18, predominantly from low income and ethnic minority families. They aim to improve their health, safety, well being and confidence.

Inspirations London - £10,000

This project will deliver a 2 week activity holiday for boys aged 13-18 from low income Orthodox Jewish families to increase confidence, social skills and enjoyment of outdoor activities.

Centre For Armenian Information & Advice - London - £10,000

This project will provide a youth programme to Armenian children aged 10-18, including a youth club, workshops and outings, reducing isolation and improving confidence.

Kongolese Children's Association- London - £19,900

The project will provide holiday and weekend arts activities for children and young people aged 8-18 from low income, migrant communities. These will enable them to have fun and gain new skills.

Katherine Low Settlement - London - £22,340

The project will provide educational and fun activities for young people aged 6-14 from refugee and asylum seeker backgrounds to raise educational achievement and increase social engagement.

Rainbow Film Society - London - £24,360

This project will provide film making workshops for children and young people from non English speaking, low income families, helping them learn new skills, grow in confidence and improve communication.

Turkish Education Group - London - £25,820

This project will provide educational support and language lessons on Saturdays and Sundays for 7-16 year olds from Turkish-speaking communities who are struggling at school. This will improve their confidence and attainment.

East London Out Project London £26,274

This project will provide an after school social and support group for lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender young people aged 13-18. The aim is to reduce isolation, provide a safe place to explore issues and build confidence.

British Somali Community - London - £28,120

This project will provide study support & recreational activities for Somali young people aged 8-18 from low income and/or refugee families. This will improve school attainment & communication skills, helping them integrate into society more easily.

DreamArts - London - £28,227

This project will use the arts to explore some of the issues that are of concern and interest to children aged 8-12 from low income households, many of whom have English as a second language. This will improve their confidence, self esteem and skills.

Thames Bengali Assn - London - £29,940

This project will provide educational support and activities, mainly to children from Bengali and Somali communities, who have a low educational attainment and lack parental support due to language barriers. They aim to improve attainment and confidence.

Peckham Settlement - London - £92,505

This project works with young people, aged 10-18, from the traveller community. They run activity and homework sessions to improve well being and skills. They also run sessions for those who have left school to encourage them into training or work.

Arabic Speaking Women's Association - Woodford Green - £24,510

This group provides English, maths and science tuition for children from refugee backgrounds. With support they will overcome the language barriers that make learning difficult, settle more easily into school, make friends and make educational progress.

African Family Project - Beckenham - £26,440

This project will provide English, maths and science classes, and recreational activities, for children of African origin from deprived areas who are underachieving at school, to help improve their educational achievement.

Hounslow Asian & African Youth Association - Hounslow - £45,900

This project provides a range of educational, sporting, leisure and cultural activities for young people mainly from Asian and African communities who are at risk of social exclusion. They will focus on their educational welfare and physical development.

Kingston & District Welcare Assn Kingston upon Thames - £93,630

This project will provide holiday playschemes and activities for children from low income areas who have English as their second language.

Asian Centre Waltham Forest - London - £7,120

This Saturday club offers workshops in self-defence, aerobics, dance, crafts and ITC to girls from South Asian and Muslim communities in order to build self-confidence, and social and emotional skills.

London Saz School - London - £7,627

This project will support disadvantaged children from the Turkish and Kurdish communities with low levels of educational achievement. They will use creativity and the natural world as an alternative way to engage them in maths, English and science.

Eritrean Saho Cultural Association - London - £8,348

This project will provide a series of workshops for Eritrean young people with refugee backgrounds addressing issues such as conflict resolution, identity, health and relationships, encouraging community cohesion and building confidence and self esteem.

Turkish and Kurdish Children's Group - London - £9,000

This project will provide maths, English and Turkish language, and arts classes to children of Turkish or Kurdish origin from low income families who are underachieving at school. The classes will improve confidence and educational attainment.

Synergy Centre - London - £9,985

This project will provide support, activities and trips for young people with behavioural problems and those affected by gang culture, aiming to boost confidence and engagement in positive activities.

South East Elite FC - London - £9,993

This project will provide a football club and training sessions for young people from areas of deprivation who are at risk of anti-social behaviour or with refugee backgrounds, helping them to develop football skills, and find a new network of friends.

Camp Simcha - London - £12,240

This project will provide befriending services for Jewish children who have a life limiting or serious illness and their siblings.

Corecog - London - £13,810

This project will provide language classes for British born children from the Congolese community, helping family relationships and understanding of their cultural heritage.

Carenet - London - £14,070

This project will provide dance sessions and interactive health workshops for teenage girls of Eastern African origin who are disadvantaged due social deprivation and exclusion.

Associates of Community Trust UK - London - £18,220

This project provides sports and health education workshops to disadvantaged children from ethnic minority communities who have poor health and fitness. This will help to improve their health and encourage an active lifestyle.

Association of Eritrean Jeberti in the UK London £18,440

This project will provide weekly Saturday supplementary education classes in core subjects, to young people from refugee backgrounds, low income families and areas of deprivation, supporting them to improve their education attainment.

Afghan Community Organisation of London - London - £19,722

This project will provide educational support and activities for children with English as their second language from low income families. This will enable them to improve their language/communication skills and help to keep them focus at school.

Somali Bravanese Association In London London - £19,750

This project will provide help in English, maths and sport to children and young people from the Somali community in order to improve their learning and encourage a more active lifestyle.

Aayatiin Foundation For Relief & Development (AFFORD) - London - £22,063

This project will provide classes in maths, English and cultural awareness for 6-12 year old children from the Somali community who are underachieving at school, helping them to improve at school and integrate with more ease.

Barwaqa Relief Organisation - London - £23,200

This project will provide support in English, maths and science, as well as music and dance workshops, for Somalian and other asylum/refugee children. The classes will improve confidence, develop aspirations and positive life goals.

Ileys Supplementary School - London - £23,700

This project will provide extra classes in English, maths and science for children from refugee and asylum seeker backgrounds, helping to improve their educational achievement and confidence.

Somali Women Support & Development Group & Somali Community Support Centre - London - £24,396

This project will provide extra classes in maths, English and science for children and young migrants of Somali, Nigerian and Bangladeshi backgrounds in order to improve attendance, educational attainment and self esteem.

100 Black Men of London - London - £25,000

This project will provide positive role-models, life-skills and peer mentoring for young people from low-income families who have low self-confidence and self-esteem. The project helps to increase their levels of ambition and self-worth.

Somali Community Centre - London - £26,160

This project will provide extra classes in maths, English and science for children and young people, mostly from the Somali community, who are underachieving at school and have little support from their families.

Somali Integration Team - London - £26,397

This project will provide mother and toddler sessions to improve the language and communication skills of Somali children who may struggle in ordinary toddler groups.

SERAD (Sills Education Research And Development) - London - £27,000

This project will provide help in English, maths and science to young Somali refugees to support their learning, and improve their confidence and self esteem in and out of the classroom.

Bangladeshi Parents Association in Newham - London - £28,466

This project will provide study support for young people from low income Bangladeshi families, from deprived areas, helping to support their education and develop their communication skills.

Rights and Equality In Newham (R.E.I.N) - London - £29,200

The project will provide dance training, fitness and team building sessions for young people from diverse backgrounds to encourage the breakdown of cultural barriers.

Initiative - London - £29,613

This project will provide drop-in sessions, exam revision groups, issue based workshops and manual trade skills, for young people from an area of deprivation with high levels of gang culture and anti-social behaviour.

Balik Arts - London - £29,700

This project will provide an introduction to and experience of film making and training for young people from low income families within the Turkish community. They aim to develop their skills and give them confidence.

Black & Minority Ethnic Carers' Support Service (BMECSS) - London - £29,850

This project will provide support groups for young carers from ethnic minorities. This will improve their access to services, explore life skills, develop aspirations and positive life goals.

Westminster Bangladeshi Association - London - £29,976

This project will provide help with English, maths and homework, as well as offering swimming lessons, for disadvantaged Bangladeshi children and young people living in overcrowded, low-income homes.

Somali Well Women Project - London - £30,640

This project will help improve the literacy and numeracy skills plus the confidence and self-esteem of children in the Somali community, by providing supplementary school activities and recreational activities.

African Health Network - London - £31,096

The project will provide play and activity sessions for children affected by HIV/AIDS, helping build their confidence and skills.

Jubilee Community Education London £31,472

This project will provide a Saturday Bengali language school for children with a disability and/or from low income families.

Westminster House Youth Club - London - £31,663

This project will better inform young people about the consequences of knife crime. They aim to improve their social skills, by providing sports, arts and issue based sessions.

S.P.I.D. Theatre Company - London - £32,040

This project will provide training in all aspects of theatre production to young people living in inner city estates. These children are vulnerable to social exclusion and gang culture because of their environment and related poverty.

Action for Refugees in Lewisham - London - £34,932

This project will help young refugees to integrate into British society, especially with regards to their education, by providing learning support in English and maths, as well as creative and sporting activities.

Osmani Trust - London - £41,802

The project will provide one to one mentoring for 120 young Asian women who are struggling with behaviour, lack of confidence and are falling into anti-social behaviour in Tower Hamlets.

East London Bangladeshi Parents & Families Forum - London - £44,850

This project will provide a programme of activities, advice and mentoring for vulnerable girls and young women of Bangladeshi origin from low income families. They aim to help them gain confidence and self-belief.

Clapton Common Boys Club - London - £44,904

This project will provide an after school support group for Jewish Orthodox boys with mild learning disabilities. It will help the children to integrate with their peers and reach their potential.

Bengali Women's Group - London - £49,763

The project will provide a homework club to support children from the Bengali community who are underachieving at school, helping to raise their confidence and self esteem.

Streatham Drop in Centre for Asylum Seekers & Refugees (SDIC) - London - £49,862

This project will provide crèche and play facilities for children and young people from refugee families.

Lewisham Somali Community Organisation - London - £49,896

This project will provide extra classes in English, maths and science for children and young people from refugee and asylum-seeking families, who are under-achieving at school and who cannot always get the support they need at home.

Jewish Council for Racial Equality - London - £51,683

This project will improve the personal and emotional development of young unaccompanied asylum seekers by pairing them with a befriender from the Jewish community, helping them to adjust to life in the UK and encourage inter-cultural understanding.

Code 7 Ltd - London - £58,062

This project will provide music workshops and competitions for young people affected by anti-social behaviour, school exclusion and gang culture.

Gheez Rite Chaplaincy & Community Association - London - £59,469

This project will provide a Saturday school and recreational activities to Eritrean and Ethiopian children and young people, to improve their educational attainment and increase their self-confidence.

Newham Asian Womens Project - London - £60,000

The project will provide play and activity sessions to help children and young people affected by domestic violence to re-build theirconfidence.

Blackfriars Settlement - London - £63,215

This project will provide a Saturday night youth club to young people who live in overcrowded housing, are from low income families and who are at significant risk of knife/gang crime.

Somali Youth Development Resource Centre (SYDRC) - London - £67,604

This project will provide a youth club, outreach work and a sports programme for Somali children and young people, helping to raise aspirations, engage in positive activities and develop key skills.

Women's Aid Latin American - London - £68,372

This project will provide support and activities for children and young people from Latin American communities, who have been affected by domestic violence.

Community Centre For Refugees From Vietnam, Laos & Cambodia - London - £77,165

This project will provide homework and activity sessions for children and young people from refugee communities, in order to improve educational attainment and integration into mainstream schools.

Ilamos Youth Actions - London - £79,997

This project will increase the physical and mental well-being of young people from the local Somali and Turkish population. They will have access to physical training programmes, consultation and volunteering opportunities.

PATH (Play Association Tower Hamlets) - London -£80,496

The project will engage young people from local estates with play and activity sessions helping them become healthier, more confident and more active.

London Gypsy & Traveller Unit - London - £81,028

This project will run groups offering activities and opportunities for young people from traveller communities, to help and encourage them to widen their horizons and reach their full potential.

Trinity Centre - London - £83,243

This project will provide social, learning and developmental opportunities to unaccompanied refugee children and young people who have arrived in the UK. This will enable them to create peer support networks, and create a sense of belonging.

Praxis Community Project - London - £83,316

This project will work with 13-18 year olds from migrant communities. They will take part in music, theatre, story-telling, migration and civic engagement workshops, with the opportunity to share their experiences and influence policy makers.

Kiran Project - London - £84,051

This project will provide a variety of supportive activities including an after school club, holiday playscheme and mentoring for young people from the Asian community who are affected by domestic violence and are or have been housed at a refuge.

Afghan Association Paiwand - London - £86,795

This project will provide one-to-one support, media & arts activities, and trips for Afghan refugee and migrant children aged 10-16. They hope to reduce distress and isolation.

PACE - London - £87,482

This project will provide a counselling service for young lesbian, gay, bisexualand trans-gendered (LGBT) young people who are experiencing isolation and psychological distress.

One World Foundation Africa - London - £88,685

The project will run a youth club offering activities, advice and support for 15-18 year olds with a range of disadvantages from an area of deprivation.

Refugee Youth Project - London - £93,067

This project will improve the social and educational opportunities of young refugees and asylum seekers. They will provide recreational and educational activities including sports, trips, language support and homework classes.

Ashiana Network - London - £96,992

This project will provide one to one support and advice for young people affected by domestic violence. They aim to raise awareness & instigate early intervention. They will also provide a safe environment for young people to deal with their experiences.

Pan Centre For Intercultural Arts - London - £101,312

This project will provide arts workshops, performances and days out for refugee and asylum-seeking children who are receiving therapeutic treatment.

Peabody Trust - London - £120,829

The project will provide training in fashion design and mentoring for girls aged 10-18 affected by gang culture, culminating in the production of their own collection.

Arbour Youth Centre - London - £147,025

This project will provide learning and play activities for young women from the Bangladeshi community in a deprived area to help improve their confidence and engagement with the wider community.

South London Refugee Association - Mitcham - £90,095

This project will support asylum seekers/refugees/unaccompanied minors in the local area through representing and explaining their views and wishes, and helping them gain access to services they are entitled to, such as housing and education.

Orpington Kidz Klub Orpington £15,540

The project will provide Saturday morning clubs, end of term outings and overnight trips for children and young people from the settled traveller community and local estate to help them improve confidence and learn to work as a team.

African Culture Arts & Sport Network - Romford - £27,175

This project will provide music workshops, culminating in a public performance, for African children from refugee or asylum seeker backgrounds and from low income families, to improve their skills, life experience and confidence.

Golden Opportunity Youth Association - Southall - £56,000

This project will provide after school arts and sports activities for children and young people who are from refugee and asylum-seeking families. This will help them develop aspirations, and encouraging inclusion and participation.

Womens Centre Sutton - Sutton - £10,052

This project will provide a mother and toddler group for children of exoffenders, refugee or asylum seekers or those affected by domestic violence. This gives them the opportunity to learn through play,improve communication skills & grow in confidence.

Croydon Youth Support Services (CYSS) - Thornton Heath - £23,550

This project will provide sports and craft sessions, for young people from refugee & asylum seeker backgrounds, to increase confidence and build social skills.

Polish Expats Association - Birmingham - £27,546

This project will provide a weekly parent and children group for children aged 0-4 in a deprived area of Birmingham. The group will provide a place for children to play and learn, and to support them to adapt in a new culture.

ILIRIA - Birmingham - £28,800

This project provides homework clubs to disadvantaged children from the Albanian communities in Birmingham, Sandwell, Wolverhampton, Derby and Coventry. This will help improve their school performance and increase confidence and self esteem.

Refugee Advice Group - Birmingham - £42,462

The project will provide weekend supplementary classes for refugee children from some of the most deprived areas of Birmingham. They aim to raise confidence, build social networks and encourage friendships.

UBAH Education & Training Centre - Birmingham - £24,750

This project will provide tuition in maths, English and science, to improve English language skills. They are working with 10-15 year olds from newly arrived Somali families. This will improve their school work and ability to make friends.

Trident Housing (Care & Support) - Birmingham - £29,839

The project will provide support and activities for children and young people from South Asian families affected by domestic violence, helping them grow in confidence and emotional well being.

Home-Start Saltley - Birmingham - £5,165

The project will offer summer daytrips and outings, and multi-faith cultural celebrations to families from a deprived area, encouraging friendships, social skills and cross-community understanding.

Al Ansar Project - Birmingham - £16,542

This project will run an after school homework club for Yemeni children and young people in a deprived area. The club will provide homework and language support, and cultural activities.

Bangladesh Community Development - Birmingham - £29,188

This project provides extra classes to ethnic minority children aged 5- 15 years from a deprived area and who are struggling at school.

Communities Youth Vision - Birmingham - £30,000

This project will provide weekend sporting activities for young refugees and/or asylum seekers. This will promote a healthy, active lifestyle and teaching team-building skills.

Local Leagues Ltd Birmingham £45,800

This project will provide sports sessions, mentoring and positive role models for vulnerable and disadvantaged young people at risk of getting involved with gangs.

Dorcas Club - Birmingham - £46,150

The project will work with dyslexic boys aged 9-16, mainly from African Caribbean backgrounds. They will provide 1-2-1 support, and a range of educational and recreational activities to help them overcome the difficulties they face.

West Heath Youth Aware - Birmingham - £61,181

This project provides detached youth work to young people in a deprived area of Birmingham.

West Midlands Somali Association (WMSA) - Birmingham - £64,655

This project provides additional classes in curriculum subjects for refugee children in a deprived area.

Ashram Housing Association Birmingham £66,230

This project will support vulnerable young people and children affected by domestic violence in Tyseley, Birmingham.

Roshni Birmingham - Birmingham - £90,099

This project will provide a range of support and activities for children affected by domestic violence, the majority of whom are from the South Asian community.

Himilo Relief & Development Association (HIRDA UK) - Leicester - £29,925

This project will provide extra classes in English, maths and science for underachieving Somali children aged 5-18 from a deprived area. Italso provides IT sessions and activities during evening and weekends for over 16's not in education or training.

Bristol Community FM - Bristol - £8,702

This project will enable Asian and Somali young people to produce their own radio programme in order to increase knowledge of other cultures and offer work skills and experience.

Awaz Utaoh Ltd - Bristol - £11,000

This project will provide days out, workshops and a festival for disadvantaged young people from ethnic minority backgrounds to broaden their horizons, learn new skills gain and confidence.

Bristol Refugee Rights - Bristol - £29,676

This project will run a creche for asylum seekers and refugee children under 4. This safe play space will help reduce distress and improve communication and language skills.

Bristol Muslim Cultural Society - Bristol - £65,038

This project will provide an after school club offering maths and English support and activities, and optional classes in Arabic and Citizenship for 4-11 year olds from ethnic minority backgrounds who are struggling at school.

Tameside African Refugee Association Ashton-Under-Lyne £29,933

This project is for deprived children from refugee and asylum seeker backgrounds. By providing a weekly homework club they hope to improve their confidence, communication skills and educational attainment.

Pulling Together Young Asian Women's Group - Manchester - £4,850

This project is for deprived children and young people from the Asian community. By providing a drama project which explores issues relevant to them the project hopes to increase their confidence and self-esteem.

Manchester Congolese Organisation(MaCO) - Manchester -£28,581

The project will provide a homework club for young people from refugee or asylum seeker background offering the children have a safe space to meet friends and interact with others developing their communication skills and educational attainment.

Community Arts North West - Manchester - £74,990

The project will improve the self-esteem and confidence of young refugees and asylum seekers in Greater Manchester, by offering participatory arts based workshops.

Fatima Womens Association Oldham £49,964

The project will reduce the isolation and increase the confidence of deprived young girls from the Pakistani community in Oldham, by providing sports activities.

Aguda North West - Salford - £38,209

This project is for deprived young people from the Orthodox Jewish community who have limited access to facilities. They will have the opportunity to enjoy challenging sporting activities encouraging positive behaviour and improving their fitness.

Manchester Nile Valley Conservation & Education Network - Manchester - £15,363

This project will provide extra classes and mother tongue tuition for children and young people who are refugees . Many have experienced war and trauma, and all have had a disrupted education. The aim is to improve their attainment and self confidence.

Glodwick Care - Childrens Respite Group Oldham £2,000

This project provides weekend and holiday breaks for children from Asian families who are facing multiple disadvantages. They aim to increase their confidence and self esteem whilst having fun and making friends.

Bolton Solidarity Community Association - Bolton - £9,500

This homework club will improve the confidence and educational attainment of deprived young people from low income families, the majority of whom are from refugee/asylum seeker or migrant communities.

Eagles Wing - Bury - £30,000

This project will improve the social & language skills and emotional well being of children from refugee and asylum seeker backgrounds, by providing a creche and family outings.

Humjoli Group Manchester £28,830

This project will broaden the horizons and skills of young people from low income, migrant families by providing a range of arts and sports activities.

Eritrean Community Association in Greater Manchester -Manchester - £29,360

This project will provide educational and language support, activities and cultural sessions for children from asylum seeker/refugee families living in poverty and struggling at school, helping their attainment, ability to communicate and integration.

Integration African French Speaking Community - Bolton - £29,931

The project will increase the confidence, self-esteem and creativity of refugee or asylum seeker children by providing evening and weekend dance, drama and arts activities.

Saath Saath Group - Manchester - £25,800

This summer playscheme will strengthen the community and promote cultural understanding among children in diverse and deprived areas.

Greater Manchester Somali Care - Manchester - £27,000

This project will improve the communication skills and educational attainment of Somali young people who are underachieving, by providing after school tutorial sessions in maths, science and English.

North West Media Ltd - Manchester - £87,565

This project will provide activities based around hip hop culture, such as MC-ing and street art, to teach skills, and improve the confidence and aspirations of 12-18 year olds at risk of getting involved with gangs and crime.

Freehold Community Group - Rochdale - £28,436

This summer playscheme is for children from low income families, many of whom are asylum seekers or refugees. They provide positive, fun activities and a chance to make cross-community friendships.

Pro-Contact - Salford - £88,110

This project will provide family support and coordination of specialist services for children of Asian origin whose families are separated.

Ebony & Ivory Community Organisation - Stockport - £10,000

This project will develop the self confidence and cultural awareness of low achieving young people from low income African and Caribbean backgrounds, by providing a performing arts and cultural youth group.

Burnley & Pendle Multi-Racial Playbus Association - Burnley - £21,750

The project will increase the attainment and independence of deprived children, by proving a play bus service promoting educational development and engagement with local children's services.

Inter Madrassah Organisation - Blackburn - £29,160

This project will improve the confidence and aspirations of deprived children and young people, the majority of whom are from the Muslim community. They will provide a drop-in youth club offering activities and information workshops.

Dhamak Burnley - £10,000

This project will boost the confidence, cultural awareness and cross community relationships of deprived young people, by providing culture, music and performance workshops fusing the local brass bands traditions with Indian bhangra.

Southfield Community Action Forum Ltd - Nelson - £72,795

This project will increase the aspirations and quality of life of socially excluded young women of Asian heritage in Blackburn by providing a range of sporting activities.

Pendle Women's Forum - Nelson - £74,172

This project will provide activities that will increase the skill levels of girls from Asian families who are facing economic disadvantage, and encourage them to participate in further education, training and employment.

Sangat Centre - Bradford - £80,640

The project will improve the health and educational attainment of deprived young people from Keighley West Yorkshire by providing a range of activities to encourage healthier lifestyles and greater cultural awareness.

Bangladeshi Community Association Bradford (BCAB) - Bradford - £99,782

This project will provide a range of sports activities and training and skills to improve the self esteem and aspirations of disadvantaged young people.

Kala Sangam - Bradford - £129,814

This project will increase the confidence, self esteem and skill set of disadvantaged children by providing after school and weekend educational activities.

Home-Start Calderdale Halifax £41,513

The project will recruit bi-lingual staff to extend their family support service to include Urdu and Punjabi speaking families. They will work with families experiencing poverty who have no access to children's services because of the language barrier.

Gay & Lesbian Youth in Calderdale Todmorden £82,910

This project will provide one-to-one and crisis intervention work with lesbian, gay and bisexual young people, aiding well being and self esteem.

Black Health Agency - Manchester - £17,899

The group will support young people aged 13-18 who are affected by HIV/AIDS, through peer and professional support, building confidence and reducing isolation.

SYCS (West Yorkshire) - Leeds - £24,484

This creche for Sikh children under 5 provides learning through play, using both mother tongue and English, to help them prepare for English speaking nurseries and schools.

Urban Revolt Media - Liverpool - £10,000

The project will build the self-esteem and social awareness of deprived young people and those effected by gang violence, by providing photography training and a high profile platform to exhibit their work.

Unity Community Association - Liverpool - £86,658

This project will enhance the independence, confidence and self esteem of deprived children from ethnic minority communities in an inner city area by providing an activity-filled after school club.

Yemeni Community Association In Sandwell - West Bromwich - £56,667

This project runs a youth development programme providing educational and recreational activities to Yemeni young people aged 15 - 18 years in a deprived area.

Confederation of Bangladeshi Organisations - West Bromwich - £60,128

This project will offer a homework club, learning resources and recreational activities to young Bangladeshi people from a deprived area.

West Bromwich African Caribbean Resource Centre - West Bromwich - £74,812

The project will provide term time support in English and Maths alongside work in areas of black history, music and heritage for Afro-Caribbean/dual heritage children and young people from an area of deprivation who are not achieving at school.

Asphaleia Action - Worthing - £98,121

This project will provide counselling, peer support, art therapy and drama workshops for unaccompanied asylum seeking children and young people who have been recognised as having mental health issues.

Kent Ethnic & Refugee Action Network - Dover - £91,617

This project will provide life skills training and activities for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people.

Icon Theatre - Chatham - £8,789

This theatre project helps children and young people from refugee and/or asylum seeking families, and other disadvantaged backgrounds' to identify and resolve problems in a creative way and builds their self-confidence.

Coventry Somali Community Network - Coventry - £29,700

This project will provide core curriculum support as well as a range aof non curriculum activities e.g. drama, dance, public speaking, arts and crafts, which will improve their skills, creativity, self esteem and confidence of children in a deprived area

Sree Bharathalaya - Coventry - £10,000

The project will provide educational and language support for children and young people from ethnic minority and newly arrived communities. This will help them achieve at school and settle into life here with more ease.

Somali Cultural Resource Centre Coventry Coventry £64,752

The project will run Saturday classes in English, Maths and science for Somali refugees having difficulty at school, and provide Somali language classes for British born children of refugees to help them communicate with family and the wider community.

Swindon West Indian Community Association - Swindon - £10,636

This project will provide a Saturday School for African Caribbean and multiple heritage children, to teach core skills in English, maths, arts and music.

South Wales Islamic Centre - Cardiff - £28,980

This project will provide a youth provision for deprived young people to socialise in a safe environment, take part in activities, and receive informal education, whilst having fun.

Ethnic Youth Support Team - Swansea - £82,998

This project will support BME young people to better deal with the cultural, generational and linguistic gap which frequently exists between them and their parents, and society as a whole, in order for them to achieve their potential.

BAWSO - Cardiff - £36,989

The project will provide support and activities to children of BME origin who have experienced abuse in all its forms particularly domestic violence.

AWETU - All-Wales Black & Minority Ethnic Mental Health Group - Cardiff - £62,147

This project will support young carers from ethnic minority communities who have a parent/parents with mental health issues. They will give them the opportunity to participate in after school activities, courses and hobbies.

Displaced People in Action (DPIA) - Cardiff - £74,103

This project will provide therapeutic play, activities, language classes, trips & support for newly arrived child refugees/asylum seekers & unaccompanied minors. This will help their physical & emotional well-being & help them integrate into life here.

Welsh Refugee Council Cardiff £85,332

This project will offer a toy library and free, drop-in play opportunities for children aged 0-12 from refugee and asylum seeking families. This will improve their communication and language skills, and well being.

SEF Cymru - Cardiff - £86,884

This project offers out-of-school, curriculum-based and culturally specific activities for young Somalis to promote integration and tackle disaffection.

Rainbow Group - Pontypool - £100,949

This project will provide a youth club and counselling to young gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, trans-sexual or gender confused people, improving well being and quality of life.

Multi Cultural Family Base - Edinburgh - £48,439

This project will help children from a variety of ethnic backgrounds to have fun, feel safe and included, learn about and mix with other cultures and increase confidence, by providing after school and holiday groups.

Pan African Arts Scotland LTD - Glasgow - £7,500

This project will help children from mostly BME families build confidence and social skills by running dance, arts and crafts and drama workshops.

Fife Arabic Society - Kirkcaldy - £7,000

This project will encourage integration, remove the social isolation and raise the confidence of young people of Arab origin by providing football, swimming and other leisure activities.

CORE - Community Organisation for Race Equality Edinburgh - £45,878

This project will increase the self esteem and confidence of young people from low income, minority ethnic communities by promoting integration and by providing a one to one advice and support service.

SCOREscotland - Edinburgh - £127,489

This project will increase the self esteem, communication skills and emotional development of children from disadvantaged Black and Ethnic Minority communities in Edinburgh through a series of activities, trips and workshops.

LGBT Youth Scotland Glasgow £72,739

This project will reduce feelings of isolation and exclusion for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people by providing support, group work and activities.

------------------
Approx Total: £7,975,643

(Given many unidentifiable charities, this is the lowest estimate)
------------------

Liberals claim to be good hearted people, but as can be seen from the list above, if it was not for their own ideological policies there would be no need for the majority - if not all - of the above charities and so called "struggling" communities in Britain that need "integrating" etc.

Perhaps it is not that far fetched to suggest that they get a kick out of creating a problem and chaos and throwing money and effort into helping people because it makes them feel better about their white, liberal, western guilt.

Forgive me when I do not chip in my hard earned money for dance lessons for Afghani refugees, canoe/boat trips for Somalians, cultural well-being and art programmes for Eritreans, health and fitness programmes for Afro-Caribbeans, "drumming workshops" for community integration; or extra school and skill bases for all manners of interlopers which are pushing my own people into the history books of ancient civilisation.

Also, forgive me when I suggest that the emotional needs of Lesbians, Gay, Transgender and "sexually confusued" others are not exactly charity emergencies either.

When there are some "English health and fitness, 'self esteem' and cultural well-being" programmes specifically for the "ethnic English community", or "extra education programmes for the white indigenous working classes".......give me a call or shake a bucket at me. I suspect that will be in around 20 years time when it is we English folk who will be the minority group.

Lost in the Void - One British Nationalist....

2011-11-13T19:50:00.000Z

It will probably come as no surprise to my regular readers (if there still are any!) when I state that I have been wondering what to do and wondering what has been going on recently within the various departures of 'nationalism' being carried forth by different organisations and different websites.

Nor will it come as any great surprise when I also say I have become increasingly fed up and disillusioned at how things are going and how I am currently not really happy with any manifestation of 'nationalism' being on offer. Hence my earlier quip about departures from Nationalism, because it is increasingly the case that it is no longer really reflecting what I got into it for (or where I would like it to head in the future).

In all truth, I have been having yet another self-reflection period as to what I really think about a lot of issues and (in the process) what I am going to do with myself, given that I am currently lost in a void from which I can only see a very small guiding shaft of sunlight at the end of the tunnel.

I have still attempted to keep up with my usual round of blog sites and news sites in recent weeks, but if the truth be told, I am becoming rather cold to some of them, or rather, in some cases, being left out in the cold. Within my despondency has also come an increasing lack of emotion or passion (even distaste at times) as I read them.

It is now only very rarely that I stumble across things which chime with me and which I feel are worthwhile to have read or feel I would like to point non-nationalists to - as examples of where I am coming from and what exemplifies our cause as I see it.

Whether it is they who are 'losing me' or me who is 'losing' them, I do not really know.

I now have nowhere to really go and hang my hat, and no method of going there other than my own way - which is seemingly in isolation to many other routes and what will probably comprise of a followship of one. Always a sad sign.

However, I can only be true to myself, what fits my sense of right and wrong, my sense of a desired narrative and what seems true to the understanding and comprehensions that I have thus far learnt (and spent considerable time throughout the last decade thinking about).

Perhaps the only other option is to not tread any further at all, take my brain out of gear and put up with this onslaught of perpetual misery for the rest of my days. Or at least, for as long as I can bear it. I would not like to dwell on the latter aspect of that option too much though.

One regular site in particular has unfortunately been turning me off lately, with what I see as being a somewhat brash and belligerent tone towards all those people who are not yet prepared to claim allegiance to their new vehicle which they see as being the new salvation of this country.

By all accounts, it may very well end up being such a thing, but at the moment is still something which I just cannot really "feel" within myself, get interested in or all that excited about. I am sorry, but that is just how it is. I cannot help it. I am cold to it.

Whether it is distrust, the vehicle itself, the way things are done, the concepts at play, the people behind it, I really do not know. I do not know what it is. Maybe all of the above, or none. As a result, I do feel a bit pushed out and unwelcome because I am not prepared to lend my unconditional support to the new king that has been crowned.

Various things have now been said and done too which have left the readership there in little doubt that from now on in, it was going to be 'their way or highway'. Unfortunately, I have had to choose the highway. I do not like being told what to think, what to believe, what to stand for, who to support or who to join. Nor do I suspect do others who have their own mind.

I may end up following them later myself, but that will need to be my own choice for the right reasons. 'Inaction' and the seeming "urgency" to be seen to be busy is not one of them. In my view, that is no reason to make a judgement.

It is perhaps more prudent to properly assess the future direction of nationalism and the country at large whilst we are in a lull, than dashing off to be 'busy' with projects and issues which may not lend themselves to taking us to where we need to be in the future. Inaction at this time is therefore not always necessarily a bad thing when it could potentially allow a right decision and pathway to be made.

However, of course, it is no use sitting there forever and just 'thinking' the problems away. If we are in a leaky boat and have to decide whether to 'bail out' the water that is swilling around the foot or try and stop the leak by taking moment to think critically about the situation, it is perhaps worthy having that decorum for a short while in order to try and save a lot of unnecessary work.

But at the end of the day, either the hole has to be plugged to stop the leak, or we need to get scooping that water out as best we can. The question is, whether the hole can be plugged at all and how long a period it is worth spending in order to find out. I have thus far been patient enough to wait.

It is just not in my nature to be hot-headed, impatient, rash, gung-ho or carried off on the crest of a wave. I cannot help it, I have always been that way, it is in my identity. Sometimes it has been a hindrance in my life when I have had to play catch up later, but at other times it has often served me well in the past. I do not know which way the current axe will fall this time, in future hindsight.

Of course, those people who want to flap around and busy themselves believe in the urgency of bailing out the water, so they seek to denounce and attack those they see as being sat around doing nothing. In fact, I think it is fair to say that Britain First and its supporters need to make everyone believe that this urgency is the case in order for their avenue to prosper and survive. After all, it is only natural and serves their purpose.

On that score, there seems to be a resurgence of the "circling of the wagons" atmosphere going on, cheap shots and slurs against other upstanding nationalists who really do not deserve the kind of abuse which is normally limited to thieves, liabilities, traitors and such; all designed to cause resentment and disenfranchisement of those other avenues in order to make more mileage for Britain First.

Perhaps it is partly because things have not gone as expected and that people feel let down. It has become resented. Understandable, but not particularly good behaviour.

Generally, it just seems to be push, push push push push of late. Angry outbursts, hard talk, etc. Unfortunately, as I said earlier, I do not really like being pushed around and told what to support or not support. In fact it has made me dig my heels in, be even less receptive to Britain First and even more despondent as to where things are heading in general.

I do not have any deep qualms or quibble with the site in question, the team there - or for that matter, Britain First. It is not how I operate and not where I am coming from here. I just need to explain, if only to myself, where I am with things right now and why I am unfortunately having to give one of my favourite sites a miss at the moment.

It is only part of my general malaise, not a primary cause.

The wider issue with me is perhaps the way I am just not "seeing the vision" of the other parties and groups on offer. I am just not "feeling it" or comfortable with it. It is detached in some way from me, and I do not know how to build the bridge. It feels like the cause has splintered into three different camps, none of which I really call home.

I am currently not into Britain First, but neither am I really deeply into British Freedom, Cultural Nationalism, English Democrats, Real-politicking, UKIP, EDL, Geert Wilders PVV, BCG, Lawful Rebellion - or for that matter, National Front, BPP, EFP, and whoever else sits uncomfortably on the other side of the void.

I will not go into why this is the case with the former list, but it is not for the reasons many people might think. In fact, I am not going to be viciously hostile to any of the first group.

They are just doing things which I am not part of and going down routes which I do not feel at home with. If I cannot defend it to myself, then how can I defend it to wider circles of people? I have to believe in 'it' to actively get out there and do something.

On a wider level than that, I do not believe in, for example, the EDL/GoV fused British Freedom direction. I do not believe in realpolitking or English Democrats or believe that they or UKIP are in any way 'nationalists' who are playing a "clever game" of disguising their real outlooks or whatever.

When it comes to BCG and Lawful Rebellion, I have doubts and cynicism of what the movement will actually end up constructing in its wake - but again, I will leave that deep thought (perhaps over-thought) for another time. I have the exact same observation about Alex Jones, as it happens.

My 'general' support for the BCG and Lawful Rebellion does continue, but the thing is, I still only tend to see them as being a piece of the jigsaw puzzle and something which is able to provide a particular segment of "understanding" and "counter culture" in our country - which is necessary to plant in our nation an alternative future to the one we currently see stretched before us by the established order.

What they are doing is interesting and could develop into being very important, much more than the recognition it has today on the fringes of 'far out' TV channels and conspiratorial based websites. There are aspects of it I am not too comfortable with though - and which I find to be either odd, far fetched or too much to expect from the general public - but on the whole it has carved itself a niche.

However, I never saw it as synonymous with Nationalism or an alternative to it. It is not Nationalism, it is perhaps some kind of anti-establishmentarianist, quasi anarchic, libertarian movement which believes in the traditional civic state and statehood when it comes to organising the world stage. It is hard to pin down, but are they 'nationalists'? No, not really. Areas do overlap with Nationalism, often greatly, but it is not always the same fight as my own.

When we have to abandon aspects of our own fight and issues in order to complete a fight against what we are told is 'higher up the chain' (and get sidetracked off down various routes which are not our territory in the process) I cannot help but feel uneasy at where that may eventually lead people to. Perhaps only the deep thinkers will understand what I mean there.

Also, I had sought to use it in order to help our own fight on our own terms, but now it seems that the arrangement is at risk of being the other way around.

I do not believe that the EDL is the right thing for me, for reasons I have stated many times before. They are on a different page to where I am now coming from, so they do not speak for or represent my views on many issues. In fact, some argue that they are being played like a fiddle, and if they did not already exist they would have to be created to serve the purpose.

But of course it cannot be denied that they are an active segment of youth (and such) who are prepared to get out there and take control of the streets. They have indeed swamped the ability of the UAF and the usual suspects to claim control of the streets. I commend them for it in those ways. They too are building a counter-culture, in their own way.

Again, I am not hostile to them - we do share some common ground, but at the same time, I am not really one of them and do not really identify my cause with them. It is not what I consider my home or identity. I doubt very much if I would ever go to an EDL march or announce to friends and family that they are representative of me (other than their shared ethnicity and opposition to Islamisation).

It does not matter where I seem to look, or what various fractions of break off's are going down as their routes and methods, I just do not seem to sit right with any of them. I don't know what it is, I really don't. The only thing that still feels remotely like home in its directions and output is the BNPideas website/group.

But aside from policy and the traditional nationalism it offers me, I do not really know where that is going either. Although I wouldn't say I was 'frustrated' with it being so slow to come to the boil, I still have reservations of what can realistically be expected of it in the future anyway.

For the time being though it has my support and allegiance much more than I can offer other websites and blogs at the moment.

When it comes to the general "scene", I am getting ever more disappointed at how we cannot move up a notch when it comes to our methodology, approaches, discourse etc.

Despite repeated calls for "change" by many people this year, the background noise remains (depressingly) just the same as it always has been. The support structure, the language, the style, the backstabbing, the back-biting, the discourse all remains the same but with the tail pinned to another donkey or two.

The same people are still spending more time trolling the "reds" than they are winning over the public, the same sites are still frequented and still exist only serve to cater as distractions for that end. The same sour and bitter/nasty ranting and raving occurs, as does the rumour mills and the insular outlook of our little pond.

When we say we need to radically overhaul the movement and pull it up by its bootstraps to be fit for purpose, I personally think it means that all those things have to be looked at too - otherwise we will remain just the same, just as fringe, just as insulated, repeating the same mistakes all over again.

I find language, approach and discourse highly important for this reason. It is perhaps a pet quirk of mine amongst many others. The kind of material that emanates from certain sites and certain comments at times is hardly productive to furthering the cause and increasing the readership and fellowship of Nationalism either. That is just my own view, of course.

If we wish to build ourselves a following and gain ourselves understanding and acceptability, it is not always so wise to be that blunt and extreme in our discourse, or for that matter, approach things in the way that we tend to do.

It does not mean that we have to water down what we stand for or believe, but that it may be prudent to express it in a different way. I do not mean "politically correct", not at all - but I do not mean jabbing sticks into peoples eyes either, whether it be descriptions of people or things, or going on about 'shadowy elites' etc.

When it comes to some of the comments on a whole host of prominent websites, well, some of that material warrants a critical minded article all of its own!

Whether it is "arab scum" who apparently deserve be "nuked from the face of the earth" by their neighbours or "buried in pigs excrement" - or whether it is endless copy and paste links to Jews, things sailing close to holocaust revisionism and "truther" sites- or whether it is barking mad women who are talking out the "missing 6 billion people from Earth" (who apparently must secretly live underground the Earth's surface) or the discovery of "Hidden Bibles" or whatever else, is hardly the kind of discourse and image which we need to be presenting to the public.

I am sorry to be so harsh, some of these people may very well be nice and supportive, but for goodness sake, some of the crack-pottery is off the chart at times and a far cry from what we ought to be surrounding ourselves with if we aim to have success.

At least (on the whole) BNPideas is getting it right and remembering our purpose. When it comes to presenting the cause, the policies, the rationale, the kind of debate which might change the public's mind and get them thinking on our side, I think it is of high calibre. In my opinion, for those purposes and the platform we seek, it is one of the best offerings on British Nationalism out there.

It seems solid, it seems built on good foundations, with many of the writers and contributing members being able to run rings around the ideologically weak when it comes to what has long defined nationalism and understanding just where the policies are formulated from and why, whether it be food, energy, morality matters or ethnicity.

The way I see it, they are trying to be cleaner cut, orderly, explanatory, exemplary in their conduct and trying to uphold in themselves what they seek to expect of all of us as a movement. I have to say I value that, and I value it perhaps more than I do other sites which sometime forget our purpose of recruitment at times.

But, yes, like everything else, they too have flaws and criticism is due against them on some fronts. Things within the party (or dual party or whatever it is at the moment), all the dancing around the internal politics of the British National Party, also some articles are naive at times (for example, one about conspiracies). On the whole, it is much more my kettle of fish though.

Many of us are disappointed about what has happened, many of us are disillusioned and have been treading water since the collapse of Barking and Dagenham etc in the elections and watching in disbelief at the whole sorry saga that has been happening ever since. This treading water is/was even the case with Britain First to some degree, whilst it sets itself up and establishes its concepts.

When it comes to some sort of contest for 'which organisation sets up first', I can only suggest that it is not necessarily the first horse out of the traps that ends up winning the race. Time will tell I suppose, but whatever happens, I hope that we can all work together than spending time working apart and working against each other. We need to co-ordinate each others efforts, not spend all our time and effort undermining and limiting one another.

The BNPideas vehicle does look to be stuck in a low gear, but let us be honest with ourselves, we have never really had a seriously credible Nationalist party or movement in Britain in over 50 years. A few months, or even a year, is not a long time to wait for one to be formulated from the wealth of experience and knowledge we have, especially if it meant not splitting up the existing following.

Many of us longed and hoped for Andrew to stand as the bridgehead of the party or a new party - and thus be there as the more polished and better presentable mascot for British Nationalism.

Many of us wanted less scuffles and pub brawl politics (and all that old garbage that tended to go on with the BNP), and we wanted more of an Andrew Brons, Andrew Moffat, Vlaams Belang/Front Nationale, LePen, meets UKIP style party which was fitting of modern political discourse and something edgy and radical like Marine LePen currently pulls off for France.

Pigs in Skips, people pretending to be soldiers in our street campaign activities, telling the media that you want to sink asylum seekers boats etc, local councillors joking about "drowning pakis" in the floods, replica gun toting morons, pornographers, fraudsters and things like having former members of staff threatening to kill your party leader (!) are hardly the kind of calibre we are looking for.

It has been a dead weight for decades. We were aching to move on from all this nonsense.

It was the logical choice to "up our game" and move into a new era, in my opinion. Out with the silly antics, out with the boneheads, wierdo's and relics of confrontational street politics - and in with the suited, articulate, well thought out political positioning as can currently be seen by Marine Le Pen.

However, of course, we first had to come that push and the collapse that could sweep this old scene aside.

We knew that within a space of months; court cases were looming, there were investigations into finance, more cases looming for ex-staff who were sacked without due procedure being followed, the debt was mounting up, bailiffs were at Nick Griffin's house, Adam Walker was ordered to pay thousands to the courts, Simon Darby was also in trouble.

We had the 9 vote loss on the leadership election, splitting the party down the middle - and we were due the Panorama programme - something which we had all thought was going to be the thing which would fully shake British National Party leadership (or the entire party) to the ground and usher in a new era, either with new people at the top or a new thing altogether without them involved.

The situation, therefore seemed untenable, as though the culmination of all those things were going to force the hand of fate for the party. Andrew Brons and his cautious avoidance of the risk of fracturing the BNP following (like what happened with the National Front) looked as though it was going to pay off. It still might, who knows. I am prepared to wait a little longer, but even I have my limits.

Let us not forget that both Britain First and BNPideas were embryonic and developing separately at the same time as each other during this time period. The former was initially a totally different ball game, something which was not really in 'competition' with existing parties or movements.

The idea of there being a "Britain First" campaign group did not bother me in the slightest whilst this BNPideas plan was being devised. This is because I thought they could be an independent addition to politics that could benefit all nationalist parties if they recruited their services or coordinated their issues locally. This is perhaps what 'working together' would/could really have entailed.

That has now changed, and so has the speed at which we expected the existing British National Party to topple. Quite unbelievably, to me anyway, none of this list of catastrophes has really happened to the severity we had suspected they would - so far.

The Panorama programme was particularly weak and pathetic, giving rise to the suspicion that they would prefer the British National Party to remain in the little league, with Nick Griffin and Clive Jefferson etc to remain in place and remain divisive and hamstringing the movement.

It seemed to me that their new tactic was going to be to demoralise the supporter base and try and fracture it on mistrust, distaste and monetary grounds. Seems to be working a treat so far.

It was clear that their previous establishment attempts to wipe the party out with "ethnic membership" or to try and quell the rising support sentiment in the public (as now witnessed in many newspaper comments) was not going to work, so chaos and mistrust over finances is the other tried and tested method of keeping people in the mainstream - and thus keeping them at arms length from what we really have to say and offer as an alternative.

If it had meant handing the party over to some wet 'nationalist' (or wet behind the ears one) or some crank type I would have been disappointed. However, throughout the reform stage and such, we coerced Andrew Brons to take the mantle from Richard Edmonds. Andrew did not really want the role, quite understandably.

The thing was, Andrew Brons was a key member who was liked by all sides, or at least recognised as a professional and good ambassador for the cause. He was known to the wider public, if only for his few TV appearances on Big Questions, Sky News, BBC and of course the MEP position he had won in Yorkshire.

Many more of us into Nationalism know much more about who he is and what he is like, what he stands for and how he likes to go about things. I had always been impressed, and I am not impressed very easily.

That is why I found it rather disgraceful to see this man be mocked, ridiculed, smeared and insinuated against last weekend on a particular site. Very poor behaviour, I thought.

But that leads us back to being in the same old bind and same old quagmire of nationalism.

Which leads me to ask myself - what exactly is the alternative to how we are generally going about things? And how should we be selling it?

I increasingly feel that we are going about it the wrong way. We are trapped into the compartment we have put ourselves into (and have been allocated by our opponents) and thus seem unable to think any differently or come out with things at any new angle or direction. I have been giving some thought to this lately.

It sounds simple, but we need to remember what our assets are. I think we need to remember our roots as an ideology and a movement and where we truly sit on the spectrum of political discourse. We are really missing out on a lot of good opportunities.

This means, in my view, turning the tables on what lines we often take with stories and various issues and taking them around that 180 degrees, directly on our opponents turf. Ultimately, hoisting them by their own petard, using their own techniques, and claiming the moral/righteous high ground. (Possibly at the same time as other issues happen on the streets and elsewhere lend credence to our positions and our grounding).

Although I am a British Nationalist, I have to admit in the last 6 months and at the immediate moment, my influences are coming more from the Occidental Observer, Amren, Altright, NPI, Front National etc than Gates of Vienna, Brussels Journal, campaign groups, EDL, BCG or whoever else.

A recent Altright article I liked, for example, was this one: http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/untimely-observations/the-new-right-and-what-it-can-offer-the-rest-of-the-world/ because it was something different and possibly worthy of further thought and action as to how we build up a future direction as a 'whole'.

Influential people in my world at the moment are Alex Kurtagic, Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor and paleoconservatives like on Vdare and like Pat Buchannan.

Alex Kurtagic, I have to say, has been highly influential to me of late. I think that he has quite a fresh and dynamic approach to things and as such he does comes at it from another angle (not necessarily the exact same one I envisage though).

Only this weekend, did I listen to his interview with Richard Spencer on AltRight Radio - and again, I am glad I did. http://www.alternativeright.com/altright-radio/ . (The RamzPaul one there is rather amusing too).

I think we need these radical (as in, different) thinkers (within nationalism) to shake things up from time to time - or to tell us some home truths about where we are going wrong or how we might do better. At least they are positive and putting suggestions forward and not just slagging everything off and saying that everything, all the time, has no point.

I need to give much more thought as to what I am trying to envisage for the cause and how it will shape my future directions. I hope that whatever happens (with all these scenarios and branches of thought) we can work something out as a whole.

As usual for me, I do not know how long I will be sticking around though.

During my current void, I have felt the need to continue getting my personal "house" in order, my nationalist related affairs tidied up, my back catalogue of collections issued somewhere for other people to use, perhaps a few documentaries made/finished.

That's why I have been quiet here lately. I have started one of my projects, and bloody hell, it is a right chore having to wade through and compile it! I could do with 100 volunteers all doing 1000 pieces each - lol.

However, I feel that I need to do this 'finalising' for the sake of personal clarity/tidiness and, admittedly, for the sake of potentially "packing-it-in" and moving on with the rest of my life.

This time next month I may feel very differently about a lot of things though. Who knows?!......

Liberal Lunatics

2011-11-01T22:06:00.009Z

It is fair to say that I have been very quiet lately and I have not been keeping up with creating new blog articles. However, I must admit I do wonder if anyone actually reads them anyway - and I unfortunately appear to have lost two or three followers since my last entry.

The reason for the quiet spell has been a combination of disenfranchisement with what is starting to manifest itself as nationalist 'discourse', the general state of affairs within the movement (and the national state of affairs), plus I have been busy with a particular project which has been on the back-burner for several years.

However, during the process of compiling a particular part of this project last night, I thought I would break my silence and get a momentary grumble off my chest. After all, what else is a blog for?!

This grumble is concerning the loathing which I have come to have for the kind of white, liberal, morons who not only actively celebrate our extinction and extermination - but actively work and support the onslaught by programmes, books, training, social engineering, mind manipulation, propaganda and so on and so forth.

Although it is not exactly hard to find such people in contemporary Britain, some people in particular are perhaps more nauseating than others for their warped mindset, especially considering when they are let loose upon shaping the minds of toddlers and infants.

I would like to say that these people are mentally ill, however, I do try and refrain from such language because although in many ways I would find it convenient, I would not really want to lock people away as being insane just for their differing viewpoints to mine. So I will not say she is mentally ill - just extremely twisted in a way which is polar opposite to my own positions.

As an advocate of white survival, nationalism, paleoconservatism, etc, I will just say instead that I find some of these people extremely dangerous. They are dangerous not because of violence, but through doctrine and intent of that doctrine they emit.

This is because they are actively engaged in encouraging the biggest (albeit 'soft') genocide in world history, because they are utterly nihilistic in their actions and beliefs, and because they claim to do it under the disguise of "doing good" for the world.

Perhaps some of them are "useful idiots" who do not understand just how evil and disgusting they are being. Who knows. Yet if they do know what they are doing, what the conclusions will be, still actively support white genocide nationally and worldwide, I cannot help but see them as sinister people. People who are hell bent on the extremes of globalism and the mocha- coloured racial melting pot world of uniformity and world governance.

Sifting through my archives at Activism Towers, a particular woman's name has cropped up more than once or twice in the last four days. This woman is Anne O'Connor.

A quick internet search - taking literally five minutes - came up with some of her details. Not that I intend to harass or distress Anne as a sole perpetrator, or particularly pernicious perpetrator - but I hold her up as one example of the kind of person who typifies the attitude we are up against when it comes to our polar opposites.

So, who is Anne O'Connor? Most of you will know her name from a relatively recent article in the Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8786641/Dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says.html) - which exposed the insanity of this woman quite clearly for all to see.

From the outlines of her approaches, it seems to me like she has been reading too many American 'diversity training' books and has sought to create a niche for herself here by pushing the same kind of agendas and discourse into the public arena.

If you have forgotten its contents (or do not know of the above Telegraph article) please re-read it, if only to help you remember the full glory of this woman's attempts to turn society on its head and manipulate children's minds.

Naturally, the reaction this newspaper article received (on the whole) was the one of 'eye rolling' , laughter, moaning and groaning about "political correctness gone mad!".

However, it is no laughing matter and is not something which we should be letting pass with just a tut and a moan. I believe that people pushing this agenda are dangerous and a threat to our survival. I think what she is doing is extremely dangerous in those terms.

Anne O'Connor is an example of what permeates society in the background - perhaps in YOUR child's nursery - which slowly and surely ushers in a cultural and societal discourse designed to wipe us out.

She wants traditional colours and roles reversed, removing the traditional notion of the colour black being seen as evil and sinister in favour of using pale pink colours - and conversely - removing white as being good and earnest by making it black.

She also believes that white paper is reinforcing racial stereotypes and that crayons must be made available in all hues of skin tones.

I had to wonder if such an array of crayons were possible. Yet in a globalist, multicultural industry led conglomerate world (where the diseased mind reigns supreme) - I should have known that not only is it possible, but is actively packaged and sold as being so.

Multicultural Crayon Pack

The Telegraph article continues to explain her ideas of how:

Staff should be prepared to lie to children about their favourite colour, and for the sake of good race relations, they should say "black" or "brown". How her full range of guidelines are aimed at 'avoiding racial bias' in toddlers as young as two - who she claims express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance which staff must help them "unlearn".

Her work and guidelines are to "challenge prejudices throughout the whole curriculum" and to "teach tolerance and respect" whilst getting them to "critically analyse what they are taught and think". In other words, messing with the minds of toddlers (brainwashing, creating memes, colour associations, etc) to enforce an unnatural agenda onto them from birth.

The deluded woman has worked with Newham and Tower Hamlets local authorities - which should be no surprise given the state of affairs down there and the "loony left" agenda that has been waged down there for decades. (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=X4AxSG2iiI4 ).

She is now in Lancaster (where the UAF often tend to stem from in the North West of England) and "devising equality material for Lancashire County Council's 'Sure Start' early years and childcare service".

However, it is not only impressionable young minds this woman wants to shape - it is that of parents and teachers too. Her approaches "helped early years teachers to explore their own conditioning and possible prejudices".

She justifies herself by claiming:

“People might criticise this as political correctness gone mad. But it is because of political correctness we have moved on enormously".

I will take it for granted that all you who may be reading this article of mine will already know what Political Correctness actually is, where it came from and what it is used for. If you are not aware, it may serve you well to find out what it entails from a Nationalist perspective.

I have not gone to the lengths of registering with the Nursery World website, where the full writings of Anne O Connor's guidelines can be found - but I will share some of the contents from my archive, which I must have acquired before you had to register or had acquired from somebody else who had access at the time.

If you thought the Telegraph article was enough, lets see some more of the material from Anne O'Connor:

Racism damages all children, regardless of skin colour and ethnicity, although it does it in different ways.

Some children and their families from black and other minority ethnic groups are greatly disadvantaged by discrimination. For them, racism is hurtful and sometimes even life-threatening. It may damage their self-identity and make them believe that they are seen as inferior outside their homes.

This 'internalised oppression' (see Equality and Diversity, Part 1, 24 September 2009) can affect their behaviour, confidence and motivation and interfere with their ability to learn. It can affect their life chances and the choices they are able to make. It is important that they learn that racism is not their fault and that they didn't do anything to cause it.

Racism also damages white children, as it reinforces wrong notions of superiority. This 'internalised superiority' in its strongest form can ultimately lead them to think that black people and others are less human than themselves.

It can blunt their sensitivity towards other people and distort their perceptions of reality (for example, 'you have to be white to be British'), because it doesn't allow them to make their own judgements based on true facts.

It also interferes with their ability to empathise, which is fundamental if children are to be able to respect and value one another. This is why it is just as important for settings in 'all-white' areas to consider these issues and ensure that they are not unintentionally confirming these distorted perceptions.

Difference

Research suggests that from around the age of two, children are aware of physical variations and from as early as two and a half, they may show signs of 'pre-prejudice' or discomfort with physical differences.

It is worrying to find research evidence suggesting that at around the age of four, children from minority ethnic groups may start to express unhappiness with their appearance as they realise that being white is given greater value.

At the same age, white children may begin to express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance. Persona dolls (and accompanying training support) provide a particularly effective way to implement anti-bias work and to help children 'unlearn' biased attitudes.

it continues:

Children are actually very good at recognising difference - and at talking about it. It is adults who find it difficult. The sad fact is that this reticence merely reinforces the sense that there is something inherently negative about skin that isn't 'white'.

Make sure all your resources, from puzzles to small-world figures, expose children to the wide variety of human skin tone.

- Provide paints, crayons, etc in the full range of flesh tones. Use the colours to paint wooden blocks and playdough as well as for drawing and painting.

- Make ice cubes with flesh-toned paints and mix them together as they melt.

- Make hand templates of all skin tones, laminate them and connect them together on a key ring. Play games matching them to people's hands or faces.

- The more children develop positive associations with dark colours, the greater the likelihood that this attitude will be generalised to people.

- Make the most of opportunities to be positive about dark tones and to challenge negative associations. For example, make angels and fairy costumes in rich dark colours and dress witches in pink!

- Provide coloured paper other than white for drawing on. This prompts all children to colour in faces/skin tones and to search for appropriate colours.

- Answer black or brown when asked for your favourite colour!
- Don't let children assume that all characters in stories are 'white British' in appearance unless stated otherwise. For example, adapt stories subtly now and again to include references to long braids, curly hair, beautiful dark skin, dark eyes and so on.

I am sure it goes on, and on, and on.

Ice cubes melting skin tones together? Purleeese! Pass me the sick bucket.

But what else does Anne get up to? What does she like and support away from her work in the diversity industry?

A quick browse of a social media page reveals that she is prime contender for being precisely the very kind of sandal and candle jockey, muesli munching, dripping wet liberal lunatic which has become the stereotype of all Nationalists imaginations.

She 'likes' supporting "bhangra drummers fused with electronic rhythms from the Punjab" and bands which purport to "bring a multimedia movement to inspire, connect, and bring peace to the world through music". She joins groups pertaining to activism for the Roma people in Czech and in the United Kingdom, supports for petitions like this: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/defend-multiculturalism.html.........and 'likes' a whole smattering of bizarre plays and purveyors of mind-bending subliminal programming.

All in all, she seems the epitome of the stereotypical "doo gooder" white, ageing hippie liberal leftie who never grew up.

Upon discovering what kind of things she was supporting in her world view, I came across a play she liked for little children called "White". It turns out that is done by people of a similar world view to her own.

I think some of you fellow white survivalists might find the plot this "artistic play" interesting as an example of how culture, media, 'the arts' is used against us.

It is a play which is now being shown worldwide - well, I suspect in all WHITE nations worldwide at any rate. There is little need for it in the rest of the world, as you will soon discover.

It seems as though it is a play about an ordinary fictional land and a couple of men whose surroundings and all the objects they own are entirely white coloured. They discard anything which they see spoils their all-white world, whether it be a blue comb, or yellow cloth........until one day, a red egg appears and one of the men realises that he secretly likes a bit of colour and decides to keep it.

Before long, both men have introduced colour and vibrancy to their dull and boring white world and white only surroundings - and although quite "scary" for them at first, they come to embrace and accept the changes which they had (rather foolishly and irrationally, of course) resisted before.

Indeed, it does not take a genius to know what the real plot is about and what it is designed to program into children as young as four. I.e. The warm acceptance and celebration of their national dispossession and racial eradication.

To take some reviews of the show from around the internet:

http://mommypoppins.com/newyorkcitykids/white-new-victory-theater-nyc-kids

....I jumped at the chance to see White, a short, low-key show for 2- to 5-year-olds.

The show follows Cotton and Wrinkle, two characters who lovingly care for their all-white world and work hard to keep it completely color-free.

The guys sweep the white floors with white brooms, sleep in a white teepee, wear all white clothes and catch white eggs from the sky. But one day, a red egg appears, and suddenly Cotton and Wrinkle realize what they're missing.

Even though they're played by adults, they act like preschoolers. They start out as control freaks who want everything their way, but they also have this amazing curiosity, which leads to changes in their rigid world.

Although the story is simple, White still delivered a powerful message. In fact, days later, my 3-year-old son continues to ask incredulously why Cotton and Wrinkle wouldn't want color in their lives, so clearly the show made an impression.

another:

In the gentle world of White, two friends, Wrinkle and Cotton, joyfully tend all about them, ensuring everything is clean, tidy and, most importantly, devoid of any colour other than white.

Birdsong fills the air and there is an overall feeling of contentment as the two men live happily side by side in their white tepee caring for one another and the white eggs that fall from the sky - that is until their unquestioning acceptance of the status quo is put to the test by the arrival of a bright red shiny egg!

White is an enchanting play for very young children, between the ages of two and four, from Catherine Wheels, the award winning children’s theatre group

another:

Catherine Wheels's exquisite new 40minute show White made for small children, and playing at the Scottish Book Trust is also about a controlled and slightly bloodless environment invaded by outside forces; but in the optimistic world of theatre for the underfours, the invasion is seen as a positive and fertile thing, if a little scary at first.

In Gill Robertson's meticulous production, the show's creator Andy Manley, and his collaborator Ian Cameron, play Cotton and Wrinkle, two little white men in white bobblehats who live in a white world of white birdboxes, nurturing white eggs that hatch into birds with fluffy white feathers; until a strange red egg falls from the sky, plunging their world into an ever brightening riot of colour.

As a metaphor for change, and resistance to change, the idea is perfectly pitched, simple, clear, witty, and gorgeous to look at. What is really striking, though, is the sheer technical perfection of the show's pacing and unfolding, as the tiny children who are its target audience follow the story in every detail.

another:

Cotton and Wrinkle live in a white world, they wear white clothes and eat and drink white food, they look after the white eggs that fall from the sky, with love and attention, but sometimes a rogue colour finds it’s way into their white environment and must be removed.

Creator Andy Manley who also plays the lovable rascal Cotton has created a vivid story which underneath lies a story of acceptance, one that works on many levels not only for the engrossed children whom the story is aimed at but also for the adults who share Cotton and Wrinkles adventure.

Andy Manley as Cotton is a delight to behold and his lovable character leaves you beaming with warmth and comfort. Ian Cameron is striking as the older and more fixed in his ways Wrinkle in a performance reminiscent of Peter Sallis – a delightfully charming grandfather figure.

another:

In the first days of the fringe, I have thrown a plastic ball at a fallen Ulysses, had a sprite whisper in my ear about a thimble, watched an office getting overrun by stuffed animals and heard the words of an American politician translated into a made up language.

But best of all, I have seen two men dressed in white dealing with the transformation of their white world into a land of colour {...} celebrating the simple transformative joy of red, blue and orange in a colourless landscape.

Next to a wigwam of white lace, white sheets and white clothing, she has built a small forest of white birdhouses. You can see why Andy Manley's Cotton and Ian Cameron's Wrinkle should want to keep the colour out of their lives as they go collecting white eggs and placing them in white teacups.

So when colour arrives in the form of a red egg dropped out of the sky, their resistance is understandable. So too their curiosity.

As the colour magically rushes into their world, giving them private pleasure and public embarrassment, they create a magnificent allegory about the challenges, fears and rewards of new experiences.

Warm‐hearted and consummately executed, Gill Robertson's superb production feels like a metaphor for a city coming to terms with an onslaught of artistic enterprise.

another:

Lola might well declare White, the new Catherine Wheels production for two to four year olds, to be her “favourite and her best” Fringe show. She’d probably want to live in the delectable all white set designed by Shona Reppe, a forest of little birdhouses, even a wee tepee for Cotton (Andy Manley) and Wrinkle (Ian Cameron), all in a medley of fabrics and textures with not a smidgeon of colour in sight.

When a scrap of green appears, Wrinkle is adamant: “Bin it!” Then it’s back to work, collecting and looking after the white eggs that fall from the sky.

The advent of a red egg unstitches everything, of course. And for a genuinely challenging moment for the early years audience, it looks as if the red egg will be binned.

One little lad was appalled and wanted to know “why???” – proving that even tiddlers can do joined up ethics and visual metaphors if guided by inspired art.

This truly beautiful show crafts its ideas with a light, but sophisticated touch – whatever your age, engage with the joy and wonderment as birdhouses open up in a new found radiance of rainbow brightness.

Of course, you might want to know what these characters look like.

Well here you go:

and

Yes, you probably had already guessed right. The White men DO look like small minded, idiotic and irrational simpletons.

Nothing like a bit of social engineering, mind bending of children, anti-white racism, anti-white stereotyping and clapping on the onslaught of white extermination via the destruction of our nations is there?!

Don't worry though, it is all supposed to be for the 'greater good' and "removing prejudices". Oh well, that is okay then......exterminate away!

These "experts", these "plays", these "charities" and "think tanks" are a menace to society and our survival. Yet, they quietly saturate it - and have done for decades.

People are bombarded with this kind of thing. At nursery, at school, on the television news, dramas, soaps, films, comedy shows, books, radio waves, music, almost 24 hours a day. Is it any wonder that the resistance to our demise is so low in the public debating sphere?

It makes you think how hard they have to work, how hard they have to try, how much they have to spend, how much effort and thought has to go into "making it become real". "It" being their ga-ga fantasy land of communistic mono-racial utopia devoid of white European people, their nations and their culture.

It also inadvertently shows the power of what would otherwise be much greater resistance by our people - simply because it is natural and healthy to resist and reject it. If they were closed down and marginalised, un-funded, shunned - what might naturally happen then? Even toddlers aged less than two seem to have the answer built into them by nature.

I hope that prospect gives this kind of people sleepless nights just as much as their sick and twisted agenda gives me such nights on a regular basis.

I am not even suggesting that "prejudice" is always correct, that we should not aim to get on well with others, and so on and so forth - but, that is not the issue at play here. That is not what the end of the fairy tale determines. Their "good intentions" are not "good" at all.

Whether these people are delusional, haven't thought it through, have no idea of what the true situation is for our people in Europe and worldwide - I can never be too sure. All I do know is that women like Anne and productions like "White" are pushing at a door which I do not seek to be opened.

What are YOUR children being taught today at school? What memes are they being given? What agenda are they being paved for? The vast majority of parents have no idea what happens, and sadly, often see little problem with it when it does happen.

Some recent issues in the media spotlight.

2011-09-27T20:04:00.003+01:00

I do not know about anybody else, but I have noticed that there seems to have been an avalanche of issues and articles (which are traditionally 'our' territory) pouring out into the mainstream media lately. It has been so much, in fact, that I have barely been able to keep up with it all.

It has perhaps always been the case to some degree or other, but there is just something about it lately that is more precise, more forthright, more stating of things that was once scorned and ridiculed as being nasty or irrational, being now so obviously self evident.

Perhaps it is the stage changing from ridicule to self evidence, which means that the winds of change could soon be upon us.

Yet, perhaps not. This is they game the MSM tend to play, forever giving us the impression that change is just around the corner and that "at last" things are being brought into the open.....like a safety valve designed to nullify any actual action from its readership.

Perhaps it is just a figment of my imagination and part of my paranoia too, but is it really a coincidence that all this is happening - and unravelling - right at the point where nationalism and nationalist parties like the British National Party are being smashed apart and run into the ground - and where nationalist morale has been scraping over at rock-bottom?

I have been skim reading a little report this week too, by a particular nationalist themed researcher from a university. He has done quite a professional looking report for Chatham House which aims to express the general concern at the rightward drift in politics in Europe (and the further potential support for "far right" and "populist" parties).

It also seems to suggest various ways and strategies which the establishment mainstream could employ to try and "tackle" this "problem" and keep people in the mainstream, somewhere where the author perhaps wants us all to remain - like sheep ready for shearing. But who knows, perhaps he is impartial.

The report suggests that support for the "right" could increase throughout Europe and in Britain. The way the media is spitting out story after story lately and (in particular) watching the way the comment sections seem to be rolling - I hope the report is right.

However, I remain cautious. Perhaps the rate in which the media is pumping this stuff out is yet another strategy to "get things out" on their "mainstream" terms before we "extremists" can make gains on it. I do not trust the MSM as far as I could throw it, so we could be being played like a fiddle as usual, but I suppose we might as well take it on face value and try and make hay from it all whilst the sun shines. If nothing else, it gives us something to "point to" as being evidence and example.

It is just a shame that we do not appear to be in a fit state to collectively monopolise on it.

Had we kept up momentum (like was the case two years ago), had we stepped up to the plate like Marine Le Pen and the Front Nationale, we could have been out there milking these things dry right now and cementing our place in the public's mind for the right reasons - rather than the upcoming wrong reasons which will no doubt be on our BBC television screens shortly.

I will try and keep this as short as possible, but when it comes to recent items I have seen on the news, read in papers and listened to on the radio in the last fortnight, the list in quite long. All of which are either our bread and butter topics or things which in all likelihood would feature in the British National Party manifesto somewhere.

Although I do not have exact links to them all, here is just a sample from the last 15 days or so alone:

An increased desire by the public and some MPs to re-think about Grammar Schools.
The furore over the greenbelt planning de-regulations.
The plans to look at widening most major motorways (and also using the hard shoulder) due to increased congestion.
Polls showing 50+ % of the public desiring corporal punishment back in schools.
The potential for thorium molten salt reactors as a future energy supply (Radio 4)
Outrage over Pakistani/Bangladeshi fecund-ism and welfare payments.
The problems of foriegn doctors understanding English and working effectively.
The shortage of midwives (and ergo the immigrant baby boom ) in the South East and Midlands.
The polls showing the lowest ever rating for local and national Councillors and MP's and the unease at the funding of parties by large companies with vested interests (Radio 4)
The proposed further increase in energy bills .
More bailouts for the Euro and Banking Cartel, including proposed "tighter integration".
New string of Muslim terrorist plots being investigated.
Admissions from Labour (via some leaks) that they suppressed yet more damning immigration factors.
Damning articles about the damaging impact of immigration on our nations education standards
Analysis of the 'fraud' being carried out in France regarding the Burkha ban.
Analysis of the Anti-Culture being promoted by the BBC and some clues as to what lay behind it.
Analysis of the charade of politics being carried out, and why little will change.
Insight into the disatrous "Lumley's Legacy" of allowing Gurkha people to settle here.
Investigations and discussions of female genital mutilation (FGM)(broadcast on BBC Radio2).
Documentaries broadcast about forced marriages.
Foreign Aid being looked at again (and admitted by Imran Khan that is a burden for them).
So called "revelations" about the hidden costs and legacy of the PFI schemes.

- and of course the usual swathe of other more abstract issues and absurdities going on, such as, for one example, a radio four debate concerning the 'rights and wrongs' of admonishing the practice of exorcism in society. No prizes for guessing where the increase in that kind of nonsense is coming from.

All of this stuff is ripe for us. All of them are either in the BNP manifesto or are things we regularly discuss - and this is just a handfull of things in the space of two to three weeks!

The liberals are not ideologically able or willing to deal with mass immigration and the greenbelt, they are not really able to get behind Grammar schools (probably because they see them as meritocracy and 'elitism'), they would never support the calls for a return to corporal punishment in schools to assert order, and I doubt they would do much about large Pakistani families and welfare payments, or immigration in general. They are not likely to repeal foreign aid either.

We should currently be scaring the established order to death, not falling out in lumps and throwing ourselves down the plughole. Perhaps it is no coincidence that as the country slips faster and faster into decline and panic, the more we have been shunted and disrupted from coming up with a credible alternative force.

I have also been thinking lately about whether we are spreading too far and wide. We can talk about things from the fluoridation of water supplies to the Libyan 'rebels'. In the bigger picture of globalism and the network of agendas and manipulation it all ties in enough I suppose - such as is the enticement of the "truther" movement and the likes of Alex Jones.....

......however, perhaps we really need to get back to "British" and put the "British" back into British Nationalism, so that we can apply ourselves to our needs and desires of the indigenous person (who is, after all, our target demographic to capture the attention of).

Maybe the thinner we spread out, the less we will poke through the current state of affairs as exemplified in the list of articles and issues above? We can gallop ahead down the rabbit hole....but are we bringing ordinary people with us?

Things are speeding up either way. Well, it really does seem that way to me.

Jared Taylor - White Indentity, What it is and Why it is necessary

2011-09-18T15:46:00.002+01:00

Although I am conscious of the fact that there has been a few American themed discussions and articles on the site lately, I thought I would share this video by Jared Taylor. Jared Taylor is behind the American Renaissance magazine and author of a good few books pertaining to white identity interests.

In light of the recent NPI conference, Jared has made a 25 minute piece outlining white identity rights and why it is necessary, using some similar arguments and points made in his NPI Press Conference speech. I have not seen Jared make such a snappy/simple video before, although I have read and seen the same kinds of arguments being made in debates and discussions he has been involved with on various American TV outlets and radio stations.

Obviously it is highly American themed in nature, but I think some aspects do travel well to this country.

White Identity: What It Is and Why It Is Necessary from American Renaissance on Vimeo.

Seeing as Vimeo seem to be playing silly beggars, no doubt at the hands of the opposition, you can, for now, also find the video here:

Now that youtube link has been censored too, here is another link! The opposition must really be running scared of this powerful exposure of truth and legitimate arguments! First the Vimeo site connected with AmRen goes down, then the youtube link, how long will this one last?!

Alex Kurtagic - Masters of the Universe

2011-09-16T19:25:00.000+01:00

{British Activism's note: This speech was delivered at a conference held by the National Policy Institute in Washington, DC on September 10, 2011. I found the following article very positive and has certainly made me think in the last few days. I recommend the whole article to all nationalists who wonder where we may need to be going from here on in.}

Masters of the Universe

Alex Kurtagic, September 13, 2011

Two years ago I asked the question, “What will it take?” How bad will it need to get, before the inconvenience of changing things becomes preferable to more of the same? I asked this because for many years we’d been hearing about a collapse that would cause a great uprising and magically solve all our problems.

The theory was that Whites in the West tolerated their displacement because they were too comfortable, because they felt prosperous, and risking their lifestyles by speaking out against multiculturalism, against racial quotas, against the slander coming from Hollywood and Madison Avenue, seemed not worth the trouble. People found it easier to keep quiet and isolate themselves economically.

And in 2009 it seemed the collapse was about to happen. And yet, despite the biggest economic crisis in eighty years, life carried on just like before. More immigration, more laws, more regulations, more surveillance, more bureaucracy, more political correctness, more money printing, and more and higher taxes to pay for it all.

Not only that, but elections were held afterwards, and the same politicians, with the same policies, were returned to power. So the question remains, “What will it take?”

The Challenge

Those who have made it their mission to educate our fellow citizens.

Not only does the ideology of radical egalitarianism permeate all institutions of power, but this ideology is so entrenched as a quasi-religious orthodoxy as to be impermeable to reason. No matter what facts or data or arguments are presented against this ideology, no matter what degree of perversion and corruption are revealed in association with the ideologues, no matter what obnoxious effects it has on the individual, it seems impossible to dislodge this ideology from the seats of power.

One can tell millions of citizens about the negative effects of diversity and multiculturalism, one can show them mountains of data, one can underline why and how this matters in a society, why and how it impacts on them personally, and many will openly or otherwise agree with what one says; but very few to speak in public against diversity and multiculturalism, and any statement is very quickly neutralised with accusations of racism.

Any debate about diversity and multiculturalism, let alone any debate about the reasons why it’s important to have the debate, quickly degenerates into Byzantine discussions about whether or not something or someone is racist.

In education, those who go against the prevailing orthodoxy are systematically purged or marginalised. And during elections we are presented with two or three nearly identical options, all founded on the same ideological principles. All with the same record of failure, all staffed by mediocre politicians, all infested with known liars, sell-outs, and opportunists. And yet, even with everyone fed up with them, even with genuine alternatives available, the same two or three parties get voted into power election after election.

For over 100 years, people like us have been saying the same things, making the same arguments, presenting ever growing mountains of data, ever more facts to support our position; and yet for over 100 years, our camp has been in retreat, dwindling in numbers, losing influence, and growing ever more marginal.

Europe saw various revival movements during the first half of the 20th century. But they were defeated politically and militarily. Much of the knowledge they produced was ignored, banned, maligned, or destroyed.

So the question arises, given what is happening to us, and given that the end product of the progressive egalitarian project is the end of us, what can we do to turn the tide? What must we do to alter the course of our society?

Left Mysticism

There are many reasons why we have not been more successful. One of them is that certain ideas lost legitimacy after the last world war, even though those ideas were much bigger than any political movement.

Another reason is that loss of legitimacy resulted in a loss of access to institutional resources; it became more difficult for those ideas to look important. And yet another reason was that as the equality zealots gained the ascendancy, they were able to use all of the institutional resources of the state to reconfigure how we see the world, how we learn about the world, and even how we think about the world.

And they also redeveloped the status system in our society, so that their ideas were elevated and enthroned, and those of their enemies scorned and reviled; so that their chums were promoted and praised to the skies, and their enemies demoted and ostracised as enemies of civilised society.

And through their control of institutions and the status system, they were able to encode their values and ideals. Their values and ideas became a system of symbols. And because symbols have emotional resonance, because they operate at the pre-rational level, at the emotional and instinctive level, the values and ideals of the Left became something a person felt, rather than something a person thought or thought about.

If we ask someone to explain how humans are equal, and if they’re able to explain it at all, we get mantras, stock phrases, hearsay, and circular reasoning, but no real explanation. “We are all human. We all bleed red. There’s more genetic variation between individuals than there are between races.”

It’s not something a person actually thinks, or does any research on, it’s something he overhears, something he feels is right, or ought to be right, because it feels good, and it feels good to be accepted in society, and it feels good to be seen as a good person.

And when we tell him that he’s wrong, that humans are not equal, and he protests, it’s not because he’s done any research—in fact he doesn’t want to look at the research—not unless it’s convenient; it’s because he feels it’s morally wrong, or because he fears social sanction, disapproval, shame.

Thus the Left has mystified its values.

And through this mystification, the Left has made its system impervious to reason. In doing so, its proponents effectively became the masters of our universe. They set its boundaries, determined its laws, defined its appearance, and fixed its cosmological constants.

The Messenger is the Message

Thus those on our camp who have based their strategy for change on educating our fellow citizens, on presenting them with the facts and the arguments, have for the most part been confirming the views of people who are already agree with us.

Where there has been a conversion, most likely it’s been because of some external factor. The facts and the arguments don’t go to the individual. The individual comes to the facts and the arguments.

The reason is that humans are rarely persuaded by facts and arguments. Rather they are impressed by their source.

In other words, the message is the messenger; and the messenger is the message. This is why it’s said that in a society the bulk of individuals follow whomever is in charge. Even when those in charge are hostile. They are awed by their masters not because they are reasonable, but because they are powerful and masterful, because they control their universe, because they control access to status and resources, because they are dangerous, or else because they represent an idea that is seductive, that somehow inspires them.

And they are not likely to oppose their masters because deep down they want to be like them, they want to be among them, they want to have what they have, or they want to be part of that idea, they want to be with the winning team.

The only time they oppose their masters, or discard the idea is when they cease to seem masterful, when there’s no longer a mystique around them, when they start looking weak and pathetic and all too human, when they look like they can be replaced—when something more seductive is on offer.

But the question remains: how did this hostile movement of proletarian anti-Traditionalism achieve mastery over our civilisation? How did this hostile movement gain followers in the first place, not only among the rabble who stood to gain the most from their hatred of aristocracy, but also among the most able and the most intelligent, the ones who stood to lose the most?

Love for Abstract Principles

We speak of our society having been hijacked by organised minorities, but the fact is this: their ideas of radical egalitarianism, of modernity, of progress, of globalism, as perverse as they may seem to some of us today, go with the grain of Western culture. Western culture is individualistic, therefore Western man is not very ethnocentric. He is less tribal, less racial, than other peoples of the world.

Likewise, Western culture is unique for its moral universalism, and Western man tends to become enamoured of abstract universal principles—liberty, equality, brotherhood, democracy, and so on. Love for abstract principles is linked to a highly developed moral sense, which comes with a highly developed guilt complex.

Like all humans, Western man is tribal and has racial instincts, but they tend to put them aside in favour of principles, or individual utility—whatever they are at a given point in time and space. For Western man, a much higher level of existential threat is needed to bring racial instincts to the surface. So what we call White ethnomasochists don’t see their actions as being against their racial or even their group interests; they see them as being moral, as being high minded.

Reason Doesn’t Motivate

Humans, generally, are not motivated by rational self-interest. Humans are motivated by the need to belong, and the need for status and self-esteem. We want to fit into a community with whose members we identify and where we feel good about ourselves. We are also motivated by inborn emotional tendencies.

And we humans also like to dream and fantasise, and are motivated by our own dreams and fantasies. They may take the form of a religion, the form of a mythology, or art, or literature, or cosmology. We dream and fantasise about what could be, about what ought to be, about how we would like to be. It’s how we create meaning in our lives. In the West, these daydreams often revolve around abstract principles.

Facts Don’t Persuade

At the same time there is too much information. Too many sides to an issue, too many versions of the same story. Most people don’t have the time or the energy to research it, to try and discover the truth, to distinguish fact from fiction, knowledge from propaganda.

The result is that most choose the data that flatter their vanity, that make them feel good about themselves, that make them feel part of their chosen community, and they reject data that seem inconvenient or embarrassing, or that come from a source with which they cannot personally identify.

Thus, if we are to be engaged in the most difficult project that can be attempted in a society, which is fundamentally to change the dominant ideology, to overthrow the ruling order, we have to begin by accepting our fellow citizens as they are, and not as we would like them to be.

In this case, we have to accept that the individual is not generally open to persuasion. Not unless he is already looking to be persuaded. Most want to be confirmed in their beliefs. They don’t want us to disrupt their world.

And it’s no good saying “Oh, they need to wake up and smell the carcass.” Humans will sooner keep on dreaming than wake up—after all, their dreams are nice and feel good, while reality is ugly and feels bad.

If we are to cause a change of allegiance, from one paradigm to another, we have to think in terms of seduction and inspiration.

As I noted before, humans are much more open to be inspired and seduced, than they are to be persuaded through facts and reason. This is why when the Lindt company is trying to sell you chocolate, they don’t tell you how it will meet your nutritional requirements for the day; they tell you it’s going to make you feel good. Never mind how, or why. Few care about the chemistry. Few want the experience demystified with hard scientific facts.

This is not to say that reason, reality, or the facts, are not important, because they are. But they are not a method of changing a person’s mind.They are a method of confirming a person whose mind is already made up, and probably made up since before he was born.

Positive Motivation

So, how then, do we motivate our fellow citizens to proclaim an unconventional allegiance, with all the risks this entails?

Earlier I said that humans tend to be impressed by the masterful. They come to an idea because the messenger is somehow seductive. They want to be like him. Or with people like him. I also said that they want to belong and to feel good about themselves. If we are not being more successful selling our message, it’s because we are offering none of the above.

Instead, many on our side offer an endless litany of complaints about how the world has gone wrong, about how we are in decline, about how we have less and less power in our society.Anyone looking into our camp often sees wall-to-wall negativity, pessimism, fear, paranoia, despair, and lamentation. It all amounts to one big, long wail of self-pity.

The despair is such that the mantra we often hear on the fringes of the Right is “worse is better.” Not because the people saying this have real solutions, but because they’re hoping the collapse will fix everything.

That is not the attitude of the masterful, of the powerful, of people who shape events. That is the attitude of people shaped by events. The attitude of a loser. Defeatism is a prelude to defeat. To succeed, we have to project an image of success.

That means getting rid of the negativity. Speaking not in terms of what we’ve lost; but in terms of what we’re going to gain; in terms of what kind of society we want to build, in terms of what happens next, not what happened before.

A winner learns from the past, but he’s always looking to the future. He’s always facing the sun. And we are solar people. We have brought light into this world. We must not forget who we are. We must not become slaves of the darkness. A winner’s image is an indispensable part of a winning formula.

Alternative Society

And a winning formula means acting as if. Acting as if we are already there, which implies operating like an alternative society, offering access to a parallel universe, physical and metaphysical. Access to a different cosmology, a different system of symbols, a different way of understanding life.

The new nationalism looks like an establishment in waiting. Not like fearful cynics who are waiting for a collapse, but like people who are building something new and important, that makes the collapse desirable because it opens the way for what comes afterwards, because it opens the way for a golden age.

Rather than looking like conservatives fighting the tide of progress, we have to be the tide—the tide that sweeps away the old and decrepit left, that sweeps them out of power, sweeps them into the landfill of history, never to rise again.

Radical and Traditional

It’s not a contradiction when some of us say that we are radical and traditional. We are radical because we seek fundamental change—we’re not looking for reforms; we’re looking for something entirely new. At the same time we are traditional, because our project is rooted in Tradition, even if it is futuristic.

This is why we are not conservatives: conservatism is the negation of the new; Tradition is the ongoing affirmation of the old, of the archaic. And therefore it’s endlessly regenerating. Constantly renewing.

Can Be Done

Now, when some of us speak of transforming the culture, of reconfiguring it in order to make our politics possible, many are intimidated by the scale of the task. It seems to them a godlike undertaking, more fantasy than reality.

But this is not so.

We don’t have to be too old to remember how our culture was reconfigured by the radical Left. It has been done before.Within living memory.

How does one transform a culture? The process begins very simply. It begins with pen and paper, with brush and canvas, with a man and his musical instrument. It’s in the hands of a creative minority, who create because it’s in their nature, because it’s a compulsion, and because they are impatient with the world around them and dream of something else, they fantasise about something new.

The artist, the painter, the philosopher do what their nature compels them to do. Over time there is a body of work. Over time they meet others like themselves and they start having gatherings, and forming clubs and associations. In time these aggregate with others of a similar mould. In time they develop into a current. In time they develop into a movement. And in time they emerge as a counter-culture. As a rival and competitor to the existing establishment.

This is when the struggle becomes political, and enters the political arena. And it becomes a struggle between two opposing forces, two colliding cosmologies, two conceptions of the universe. One representing the past, another representing the future. Only one of them becomes master of the universe.

Politics is the Last Stage

You will notice that politics is the last stage. This is why political parties like the BNP in Britain, the Front National in France, the NPD in Germany, remain marginal, despite the obvious failures of the Left.

Politics is the last stage. Politics reflects the culture. Politics is the art of the possible.

So our politics will not be possible until we control the culture. And because we don’t control the culture we are in the period before politics.

The Left is approaching the period after politics, because their ideas have been dominant for a long time, and by now they have failed on every level. They are running on autopilot. And now they are increasingly worried and desperate, because they can sense their own weakness, they can sense the boredom and the discontent seething underneath, the potential for a revolution.

They have failed aesthetically, criminologically, culturally, demographically, economically, politically, socially.

They have failed on every front and by now they are vulnerable on all fronts.

War on All Fronts

This is why our project is a war on all fronts, and why it needs multiple angles of attack.

There is room for individuals of every inclination, man and woman, young and old, with different talents and abilities. Which means that anybody can wage the war in some way or another. Some will do it as writers, others as artists, others as business people, others as protesters, others as patrons.

But to attract real talent we have to provide opportunities for talent. Which means business and professional opportunities.Because in our economic era, being economically independent from the system, and having alternative sources of status recognition, means being intellectually and spiritually independent.

And to be attractive we have to be image conscious—because a picture speaks a thousand words. If we want our fellow citizens to see, we have to help them visualise. We have to show them what we mean, and we have to do it in less than a second. Most people make up their minds about something or someone in less than a second. They won’t read a 400-page book. They won’t even read an article. Not unless they’ve already decided to do so.

What captures their attention is what resonates with them at the level of instinct, of emotion, at the animal level, at the spiritual level. The way music resonates. The way a landscape resonates. The way a film resonates.

Man is the symbolising animal, he operates in symbols, structured sounds and images. That’s why a person’s authority is instantly obvious. It’s in the way he looks. The way he sounds. The way he carries himself. Often he becomes a symbol of authority.

So to become masters of our universe once again, to rise as new masters as the old ones fall, a new nationalism needs to look like it deserves the sceptre of power. It needs to symbolise a new beginning. And it needs to symbolise it now and always, and not wait for the collapse to clean the slate.

We don’t know when that collapse will come, or what it will look like, or even if we’ll notice it. But if and when it does, it will clean the slate for everyone, for every competing group, and there are many others who are looking to have a bite at the cherry after the liberals are gone.

Islam is looking to dominate in Europe, and in the West. And Islamists are also hoping for a collapse.

We cannot expect a collapse to solve our problems. In fact, we shouldn’t be focusing on the collapse at all.

We should be focusing on the world we want to see after the collapse, the world we want to see tomorrow. And we have to be building it today, because if and when that collapse comes, if we are not ready, if we are not there, looking like the world is ours for the taking, someone else will be, and they will become the masters of our universe.

Focusing on the world of tomorrow gives us an added advantage, which is the same advantage that the utopian Left enjoyed in years past: the advantage of having a sense of mission, a greater purpose.

It’s not a 9-5 job, where a person lives for the next weekend, for the next paycheque, dragged along by involution in the Kali-Yuga. It’s about mastery over our lives, mastery over our destiny, mastery over our past, present, and future.

Being traditional also gives us an advantage that the Left doesn’t have because they are anti-Tradition: the advantage of belonging, of being part of a community of people with whom we feel at home; of having a home and a family to which one can always return; of having a past and a future; of life with meaning, because we are part of something greater than ourselves, that is timeless and transcendental.

With the Left a person is always homeless, always a stranger, always a meaningless atom in a sea of Formica, PVC, neon, polyester, and reinforced concrete.

One final advantage is that the citizenry is fed up. The individuals now in charge, in education, in the media, in politics, have amassed such a stupendous record of failure, have committed so many abuses, have lied and stolen so blatantly, that tax payers will be receptive to something new if they see something viable.

At the moment they keep voting the same politicians back into power because they are not impressed by the alternatives. They are choosing the least worse option.

So it’s not as if we are not given plenty of material to work with.

Concluding Remarks

I would like to wrap this up by underlining the key ideas I would like you to take back at the end of this conference.

If you want to help bring about fundamental change, and are actively involved in the process, I ask that you incorporate in your approach a few basic principles:-

One—think irrationally. Humans have the capacity for reason, but they use reason in irrational ways. They often have irrational motivations, which they rationalise after the fact. But they are irrational. So to reach our fellow citizens we have to understand their motivations, and not be irritated by them when they differ from ours. We have anticipate their needs so that we can meet them, anticipate their fears so that we can dispel them, anticipate their desires so that we can fulfil them. Especially if they are irrational.

Two—impress to inform, don’t inform to impress. Often a person who sits through a speech doesn’t pay attention to half of what is said, he remembers only one or two phrases, one or two concepts. And not for very long. But when there is an able speaker the listener is nearly always impressed by the delivery, he likes the energy, he likes the emotions roused in him. Therefore he listens.

We often comment on the speaker, less on what he said. So aim to be impression oriented, to be effect oriented.

Marketing and information campaigns are not about information. They are about eliciting a reaction, inducing and maintaining a state of mind, opening the mind to an idea—among people who are overloaded with information, who don’t want to be disturbed, who are wrapped up in their own lives.

That’s why marketing and information campaigns aim to be iconic. That’s why they reduce everything to a soundbite, a slogan, an image, or a jingle that is infectious. Facts are important, but at this stage they are subsidiary, because a mind remains closed so long as the spirit remains unmoved.

Three—think in pictures. Help people visualise what you are offering. A picture speaks a thousand words, and it’s a lot easier to remember. And much more difficult to argue against because images resonate at an emotional and spiritual level.

Four—be positive. No one wants to be around a person who complains all of the time, who is always negative, who is always doom and gloom. Humans respond to optimism, because they want to feel good.

And our people in the West are crying out for a renaissance. So be positive, and focus on the future.

It’s about where we came from and where we are going, not about where we are.

Five—enjoy the struggle. You will be more creative, and you’ll have more energy, and you’ll get more people interested in you, if you enjoy what you’re doing. Because if you enjoy what you’re doing and you’re good at it, you feel confident. And everyone likes that.

So think irrationally, impress to inform, think in pictures, be positive, and enjoy the struggle.

Thank you very much.

[Mr. Kurtagic is a novelist and essayist based in Britain. His website is here. A chapter from his most recent novel, Mister, was posted here on the AR website.]

American Conference (NPI) Video

2011-09-14T20:16:00.002+01:00

Although I am primarily a British Nationalist, I have always had an interest in America when it comes to some of our historical ties as a civilisation and our current joint plight when it comes to seeking some self preservation. We are both heading for the oblivion milestone of minority status within a matter of decades.

I therefore do tend to keep a keen eye on what American Nationalists and "race realists" are up to, because in some ways, even though their issues and their history and such are different to our own (in terms of population, civil rights movements, Hispanic issues, etc) I think we can learn from some of their wider positions and presentations that transcend the divide.

Many people who come to this site may already know of it and may already have seen it, but I wanted to make sure I shared this full uninterrupted and unedited video of the recent NPI "Majority Strategy" press conference featuring the wonderful author and spokesmen Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, Political Cesspool radio host and author James Edwards and the man behind the Alternative Right website, Richard Spencer.

As is usual for when any dissenting viewpoint being made, the usual rag tag Antifa style loons turned up to protest outside, even remarking how they would like to take an automatic assault rifle in there to deal with "the nazi's" and so on and so forth. They only numbered a handful, which was truly pathetic - and inside the venue the meeting took place without hitch. It was impressively smooth running.

So what were these horrible, sig heiling, fascist, nazi set of swines discussing? Are you not into Nationalism and have you ever wanted to know what kind of discussions are had at these "hate meetings" when these loony tunes Antifa/UAF type people are outside various venues around the world waving their placards and screaming that the baby-eating race haters are inside plotting a new Reich?

Well, now is a chance to find out. If you ever took those protesting types at their word, then you may be in for a shock! Bear in mind that this is the full press conference, unedited. I think it is worth watching the whole thing, even though it is explicitly American themed and orientated. There might be more videos coming from the full conference, featuring other figures such as Alex Kurtagic.....but I will have to wait and see.

The Majority Strategy — NPI Press Conference 9/9/2011 from NPI TV on Vimeo.

I wish them all the best in pulling off their strategy and saving themselves from the brink. Good luck.