So, what's on my mind lately?

Meanwhile, back at the ranch......

Well, although it is getting to be a recurring theme, I haven't really had all that much to say lately. This may even be the true underlying reason behind me making the latest video. After all, why write a book when a four minute video conveys it in a nut shell?!

In all honesty though, I suppose am still at a bit of a low ebb with a lot of things at the moment, even to the point of wondering if there is any point keeping this site going.

There are millions of blogs out there and probably a few thousand nationalist ones of various hues and avenues - so why keep open yet another one that hardly gets any views or comments anyway?

Other bloggers seem to be doing a sterling job and have a little bit more energy and drive about them than I do. Durotrigans, for just one example (http://durotrigan.blogspot.com/) where content is updated a few times a week and is always pushing and cajoling its readership to march on. 

New Video - You Aint Seen Nothin' Yet

This is a new little video which I put together the other day, set to the song and tune of Bachman Turner Overdrive 'You Aint Seen Nothin' Yet".

Whilst I acknowledge it is a bit crude and extreme in its position (and therefore not particularly designed as a recruiting tool!), it reflects what has been on my mind in the last week or so from within the bubble of that mad-thinking nationalist world we tend to live in at times.

It is intended to be a little bit humorous in parts, in a kind of tragic and mocking way - but the fundamental message itself is of course a serious matter. The video description text on YT explains a little more. 

Thanks for watching.

More Musings on Recent Internal Affairs

This is in relation to Andrew Brons' latest article on the BNPideas website (http://bnpideas.com/?p=3519) and some of the silly factional sniping that has been taking place. 

The BNPideas site had been static for a week or so, inevitably prompting more derision and indeed, also some genuine concern about it too.

It has been back up though in the last few days, although it is obvious that much of the moderating work is falling onto one or possibly two sets of shoulders who have their own lives to attend to and cannot always devote so much of their time to such a thankless task.......

Nationalist Culture: Our greatest problem?

Does nationalist culture reflect well?

Over the last few months, I have been looking around at 'Nationalism' and taking a bit more notice of the culture within it than I usually do, particularly on some of my more regularly visited sites.

In the process, I have been increasingly getting dismayed at what I have been seeing. When this is coupled to the general state of affairs, it cannot help but reinforce the feeling that we are finished as a nation and as a people. 

I wish it was not true, but it seems that we are just not able to step out of the murky waters and snap out of the cocooned nature which envelops us as a people and as 'Nationalists'. People seem unable to step back and have a good look at ourselves and some of our output. 

I do not exclude myself from this, for we all tend to bring the same formulaic things to the table, but I have more specific dynamics and examples in mind.

The antics have become all too predictable. Like a pantomime you have seen 5 times, you can get to the point where you just know what is going to happen next and can even mouth the words. This goes for each end of the nationalist spectrum. 

British Nationalism 'Vs' Knotweed

Japanese Knot-weed - A tale of our time?

It has been a while since I have treated you all with one of my crazy analogies (lol) - so I thought it was time I filled the gap.

I originally wrote this as a reply to another article on another site which was orientated around numbers and immigration, but thought I might as well add it to my site now that I had typed it.

Without wanting to be the harbinger of doom too much - we have to wake up to the fact that the writing is already on the wall when it comes to demographic numbers.

It is no longer a case of "taking moderate, toned action on immigration to avert catastrophe later" (as some still suggest). That alone is not anywhere near enough, not any more. The real question is, even if numbers were stopped tomorrow, 'what can we do to turn this existing situation around'?

Stopping further immigration almost completely is the necessary requirement in order to make the former job easier. Therefore that particular aim and aspiration for Nationalism goes without even saying.

The more difficult aspect to wrestle with is how we save ourselves - (should that cease of immigration ever be achieved) - considering what is already planted in our garden.

The seed has already been sown, but we (as a wider nation) have yet to see the full 'flower' burst through into full bloom.

They are currently coming out of the nursery beds in great numbers and will soon be entering the main gardens and going on to further pollinate in the future at twice the previous speed, sometimes cross pollinating with other plants.

The government (the garden tenders) are just adding more and more manure (and talking a lot of it too) to make sure their poisonous plant thrives in territory it was not meant to be potted in. But it isn't really needed - for the beast they have planted already thrives on the conditions of the country's habitat which they have 'kindly' provided for it.

The garden tender encourages their growth, provides their nutrients, etc, whilst ceasing to water the plants that originally made the garden great. Those plants are not reproducing themselves in this newly cultivated and unnatural environment. They are put under strain to help provide for the new plants.

The planters have done such a good job encouraging the new plant that the plant thinks the territory is now theirs just as much as any other plant that was there before it.

To them who brought it here and still bring them here, it looks like a nice addition to spruce up the 'drab' garden a little, but they deliberately chose (and still choose) to ignore the very nature of the plant - a plant which eventually suffocates and extinguishes all existing plants (like Japanese knot-weed) and creates a new monoculture in its wake.

It is not always a brutal fate, but more a slow strangulation and domination which builds as something which at first resembles a garden - and can 'blend in' to some degree or another throughout the process of initial change.

In some people's eyes, "it is green, it has leaves and flowers, what is your problem? Looks like a plant to me, just like any other". And indeed it is, nobody can dispute that - but it is more about where it is planted than whether it is a viable plant or not - with its own merits in its own right, in its own traditional environment.

We are all now seeing the shoots of this plant poke through the native soil, right across the whole of England and many parts of urbanised Wales and Scotland. There are not many places left which have no signs of the shoots beginning to break through - albeit in slightly different forms of the plant.

Clusters and clumps are everywhere, some more established than others. Some parts of the landscape are already overrun, but for most dwellers of the nation they are often areas which are out of sight, and thus out of mind.

It is now apparent to most people that change is underfoot, but people seem to have no idea of the pace and scale at which this plant will grow in just a few short years - and what it means for their future garden landscape.

.....After all, they have now long lived in a garden of subtle variety - and throughout this period they have been informed that all plants bleed green chlorophyll when cut - and that no plant is any better than any other plant....so this is nothing to be concerned about at all.

However, like Japanese knot-weed, when the true danger is realised by the common-gardener, the growth rate of this plant will overawe the landscape faster than they can come to terms with it and its effect.

Some of them may clear a new space together and pot some traditional plants well away from the over-run area - but again, like Japanese knot-weed, the environment created there does nothing but entice the invasive plant to germinate there too and get a toe-hold, because they tend to be much nicer and better tended areas.

Before long, the secluded enclave of the garden is unable to defend itself from this intrusion once again. Especially when the existing plants have not had a taste of their future and thus welcome the new addition at first - just like all those before it. The runaway and hide option is not available. There is nowhere to go, and nor will it alter the rest of the situation in the garden if they did find somewhere.

The landscape becomes choked with it, and on the whole the garden becomes increasingly unkempt and unproductive. It no longer resembles (or even smells) like a British garden either.

To remove Japanese knot-weed is extremely hard. It takes a multi-pronged method to prevent its growth and re-growth. It is even harder to remove when many gardeners are unaware and not interested in the threat that is faced by it, and will actually condemn its removal because they have become accustomed to it - and in some cases very fond of it.

The planters and enthusiasts hope it can sell this devastation as a huge benefit for the landscape, citing the tough qualities of the plant (for example) and telling us that it does its job to help global warming by turning carbon dioxide into oxygen, and that its growth rate is therefore a massive bonus for us all - even though all these verbal tricks make no real difference to the fate of the existing flora and fora.

Attempts are also being made to try and genetically splice the different plants together to make people forget the true variety of indigenous plants we once cherished, ready for that monoculture, so that the younger green fingered gardeners of tomorrow will have no knowledge of anything any different than what is already here and planted in our garden today.

To successfully remove Japanese knot weed from the landscape takes some very brutal gardening measures. The history of worldwide landscape gardening teaches us all this and our garden will ultimately be no different to that of other gardens which have had invasive and expansive species planted within the borders and rockeries.

This unfortunately leads to the second question of our time: Do the wider public have the stomach (or understanding of the problem) in order to act accordingly within the time left for the landscape to be saved from ruin?

Are they prepared to get their pitch forks out, flame throwers, tarpaulin sheets etc to smother this problem before it becomes too great to collectively act upon as a whole, no matter what stripe of gardener they were before?

Will the more weak willed gardener even be prepared to turn a blind eye whilst others attempt to take action? Will they ever switch off their X-boxes, football and Coronation Street long enough to even hear the calling we shout, never mind understand it and support it?

Unfortunately, I believe the answer to that question is 'no'. No, they are not and no they will not. They show no signs of doing thus far, anyway. I have little reason to believe they will in the near future either.

The third question is therefore either 'how do we achieve this then?' or 'what do we do then, given this worst case scenario?'.

But this is where I ask you to put your answers on a postcard to Gardeners World........because I suspect that is the answer which we all seek, and no matter how many articles we read and write, how many silly 'flash in the pan' campaigns we have, how many comments we write to papers and blogs, how much we moan etc - the answer is not going to materialise.

All we can do is cultivate conditions which are geared towards helping and pushing forward, just in case, through a miracle of some kind, that an unexpected turn occurs and we can tend to our garden once again.

In many ways, we all know what the answer needs to be - but we cannot envision it happening, nor face it, even if it was popular and well backed, which it isn't.

No matter what we do, we will tend to be seen as thugs who are ruining a picnic in the public garden by ripping up what we believe are dangerous and poisonous plants that will suffocate the picnic dwellers in the end.

We are extreme gardeners acting with good horticultural knowledge - the picnic people are not green fingered. They are just out to have a "good time".

They are like city kids who have no knowledge of animal welfare in the countryside, who are going to be angry and annoyed that the sacred cow of their immediate surrounding is being shot in the head - even though it was riddled with TB, had broken its leg, was a threat to the rest of the herd and was suffering greatly.

They only see the horror, the nastiness, the brutality of the action being taken - and not the 'knowing compassion' of the farmer pointing the shotgun. This makes it hard to win support, for we unfortunately have to operate on this kind of basis if we are to create conditions for the rest of the herd to survive.

There are only a few glimmers of hope left on my horizon. Just a few "not yet dones" of "thinking outside the box" left. They are grasping at straws too, to be honest. Some of them are very dark and shocking (though non-violent!), others are more dreamy and much more geared for polite society.

I hope to concentrate on the latter ones, no matter how futile they may be. It seems to me like all is already lost, but despite the seeming futility, I would rather see some kind of struggle being waged against the knotweed than have us just 'down tools' and watch the natural fora and flora be forever put into the shade.

Some Refutations........

I suppose I have again been neglecting the blogsite lately, but that is not to say I haven't been busy or not writing anything. Besides, I think would rather write something for this site when I feel I have something in particular to say, rather than just produce random output for the sake of keeping it topped up.

Anyway, back to business.....

After quite a leave of absence when it comes to facing down what people these days seem to call "libtards", I thought I would throw my hat into the ring and try and 're-cut my teeth' on providing some come-backs to some of the points and positions they make. 

The primary objective of this, from my point of view, was to throw things out there and see what came back. 

If I ended up being "beaten" and shown to be a complete fool, then I thought I would either have to "take it on the chin" and accept it, change my ways - or try other angles and use the experience to hone some further skills on how to plug up the holes which they had managed to break through.

As it turns out, I did not seem to have much trouble -but that is not to say that the ideas, replies and such I gave out are perfectly correct or should be employed without caution and some basic understanding of the directions I tried to use. 

It reminds me a lot of something which I wanted to get off the ground for the last seven years or so, but never managed to pull it together or find others interested in helping me with the project.....

The focus of the topic that these replies were penned for, stemmed from the Emma West "Tram Lady" issue from earlier this month. Again, just like a spotted several years ago, the opposition groups have a standard set of comebacks, which perhaps only comprise of around ten main focus points. 

For example, slavery, colonisation of America and Australia, doing the jobs we will not do, they pay for our pensions, doctors and nurses we needed, curry and foods, English going to live in Spain,the British Empire 'stealing their wealth', no such thing as English/nation of immigrants/mongrel race etc, how we went to war with Hitler to fight views like ours...... 

That is probably the main set. The others are variations on the same theme or based on egalitarianism and emotional themes of "hurt" and "not judging peoples character by their skin tone" etc.

The idea I had several years ago was to hone a near water-tight refutation of all those standard points, so that they can be used time and time again, instead of wasting so much time reinventing the wheel. 

Even if they could not be honed that well, I hoped that they could at least stall a debate and make our opposition work as hard as we have to work to counter their points.

I am not really one for bothering to engage with this kind of thing any more, but whilst I have been off work on holiday (and off a bit sick, like always happens when I stop working!) I thought I would have a crack at arguing with the opposition. 

They are not perfect replies. Some parts of them are taken from other replies I have seen elsewhere over the years. They are not designed or suitable for "copy and pasting", so watch out for that. 

They are not there to provide "stock" answers. I am providing the following responses for the purposes of providing others with a certain line-of-thought, which they themselves may have either forgotten or not thought about for themselves. 

Use them at your own risk - and use them only if you understand them and can defend them, otherwise you will look pretty silly when you cannot come up with the same standard of reply or continue the type of language being used in them, or cannot back up the thinking behind the points being made.

In an ideal world, I should properly sit down and professionally compile these into a more suitable format (as I had previously intended). But, I think life is too short, especially for me when I am not sure how long I will be bothering to concern myself with Nationalism and the various issues we face. 

I thought you'd better have them now than maybe not at all. I thought they may be better on here, than sat on my computer or sat randomly between another 630 replies on a random website. 

If you want to see the true context of the replies I am responding to, you will find them on the British Resistance website, on the article called "Emma West: Truth or Racial Harassment" - which is currently the highest commented article on the site.

They are in no particular order, and the lengthy 'all encompassing' set of replies to the "sympathiser" were not submitted for publication there, so they are exclusive to being here at the Independent British Nationalist blog. 

Be warned, they are all quite substantial! 

Okay, here it goes: 

What a mystery.......

Just a little news from the Daily Mail today regarding the disappearance of community spirit within our nation.

Apparently, a survey was undertaken by Nissan Motors in order to find "unsung heroes who have performed random acts of kindness". 

The result of this study, according to the Daily Mail, is that 70% admit they don't know who lives next door, only 6% say community spirit is strong in their area and 51% wouldn't ask their neighbour for help.

The main reason given for the decline is "lack of time to meet those in the community", but quite frankly I find that to be a pretty preposterous excuse - something that one would give to pollsters to cover up other reasons.

In many cases, especially in southern inner cities, people have often been neighbours for over 20 years and still do not know their names or have even spoken to them.

I also believe that much of it due to a general decline in what used to bind us as a society....such as where whole streets, or almost whole towns in some cases, worked at the same few factories or shipyards. I bet the sound of clogs tapping down the cobbled streets could often be deafening. Now, we get in a car and in some cases drive 30 miles to work.

Also, thanks to a planned and purposeful rotting of our institutions, pass times, cultural events, sense of history and our previous religious rigour, we do not meet our neighbours to go on Whitsun Marches, Easter Parades, do the Maypole or a proper Guy Fawkes Night (currently known as "Bonfire Night" for most people).

Working mens clubs have been shutting, the "turns" they had on have largely vanished, as have the ballroom dancing clubs (up until recent TV inspired revival, perhaps). Computers have arrived, insular lifestyles have arrived - of which I myself have fallen victim.

So, yes, some of that move away from societal cohesiveness and neighbourliness is to be expected in a 'modern' fast paced and hard-nosed society which fits many an inner city area - but is it the whole picture? What else might be going on? What might also be playing a part in our "hunkering down" and tortoise-like view of our homes and the "other world" outside of it?

The article states:

The main reason given for the decline in neighbourly relations was lack of time available to meet those in the community. More than 40 per cent admitted that they had never had the chance to speak to those living less than 6ft from their front door.

David Jamilly, founder of Kindness UK says: 'Kindness and kind acts, towards people, animals, nature and the environment, are what make the difference between a "me society" and a "we community".'

Now, call me an unreconstructed old cynic if you like - but let me offer my opinion on something which may be a major part of this scenario. 

Now, I know it is a wild and crazy suggestion, really well and truly 'off the wall' and utterly beyond all comprehension to most 'think tanks', MP's, charities and such.....

.....but.......

.......do you think that the importation of something like 6 Million people from all around the world that are festooning our towns and cities in some sort of rebuilding of the tower of Babel (and now being a "community of communities" rather than "a community")  just might have something to do with it?

I know, I know, it sounds really insane doesn't it. How on Earth could the utter destruction of community identity via an implantation of a cacophony of languages, races, religions and cultures ever have such an impact on what used to be a much more friendly and civilised country - if not once the most civilised and safe country in the entire world? 

It really is a mystery isn't it?

However, I wonder if anyone else may have thought of it? After all, this phenomena might just be a factor in it.

It might also be a factor in the loss of "social capital" just as we all witness with our very eyes (and through the extensive research of liberal sociologist Robert Putnam).

Yes, I know that was a study which was done in another country, and it could not possibly happen here because , well, "this is Britain!" - but maybe, just maybe, it is worth a look into?

You know, I really would like to get to know my nation's usurpers and interlopers that reside in my town, but the thing is, I really just cannot seem to 'find the time'. 

If only I had more time, I could enjoy the wonders they bring to my people and my country - and congratulate them (and the last seven or eight governments) on really pulling this country out of the complete shit it was in before they arrived and made it so much better for us all.

I could visit the mosque, have a little kick around at football with mini-Mohammed down the road. They could send me a samosa (vegetarian for me of course) and I could send them a  non-pork based meat pie. All would then be marvellous in the world. All my issues and concerns would suddenly flutter away.

Funnily enough though - well, you know how it is -  I have too many things to do - like watching paint dry, cutting my toe-nails and re-ordering my CD collection from that of 'genre' to that of being in alphabetical order.

I just cannot find the time for 'community events', much like the vast majority of other Britons (and indeed the interlopers themselves).

But what is this other report I see?{see link}

Oh dear, oh dear. This will never do. It seems that the British people are getting a little bit disenfranchised with society, the government elites and the ethnic minorities being pandered to. 

The (left-leaning) Joseph Rowntree Foundation has discovered that there might be a sense of alienation within the white working classes.

I know! I know! What on Earth could have brought this on? What a shock and surprise! These people really must have their finger on the pulse to spot this one coming through the net. 

You know, upon reading this, I'm now starting to wonder whether it might also have something to do with the other story and that it may stem from the same causation......

....I know, it is wild and wacky, but could 60 years of liberalism and liberal immigration policy (which has recently seen 5 million people arrive unasked by the indigenous white working classes) have any bearing on this sense of disenfranchisement?

Maybe the fact that they were never asked and that nothing is ever done about their objections to it has rendered them a little bit cynical and distrusting of the government and ruling elites? 

I'm just throwing these wild ideas out, you know, just in case. Somebody has to try and solve these mysteries as to why this kind of thing is happening to this country after all. 

So, what they are suggesting for fixing this disenfranchisement and disconnection....(and it ties nicely into the neighbourliness study of the Nissan group)......is that we have more "street parties" to get to know each other.  Yay! Everybody likes a party.

That's right. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation suggested street parties were a good way to build community links.

Crack open those tupperware bowls and the samosa mix, I'm coming!!!........after I have sorted my woodscrew jars into category by length and width, and vacuumed out the unsightly car boot fluff, that is.

Rather than being spontaneous and natural, we are now having companies monitor and assess our societal decline in order to congratulate things which were once taken as a given in our societies......and seeing liberal policy groups like the JRF wanting to encourage un-natural and somewhat forced street events so we can all jolly well get on like a nation on fire......oh, hang on! I mean 'house on fire'......(or do I?).

So what is it that seems to worry the JRF about this disintegrating state of affairs?

Are they innocent bystanders just tutting over their 'fair trade' muesli at this mysterious sense of 'perceived' grievance and loss of community spirit?......hmmn......I wonder.......well, what does the article say in the paper?:

However, the white working classes remain proud of their identity and the values they stand for. These include working hard, looking after each other and having pride in their community.

Oh right.....would that be those very same 'racist' white working classes who we have all been told for three decades or more (by these kinds of organisations and government elites) 'do not want to work' and have 'no pride in their community'?  Could be!

The research, published today, also criticised previous studies on community cohesion for focusing too much on ethnic minorities rather than the area they lived in as a whole.

Clunk-click.

That is the sound of these groups changing tracks from one of open "multiculturalism" to the one of the recent "muscular liberalism" Cameron-Merkel-Sarkozy inspired "one-ness" through multiculturalism in order to get funding and backing. 

They, and those like them, apparently made a 'mistake' by ramming this ethnic stuff down our throats all the time because it is looking like the host community is starting to get a little cheesed off.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation called for the allocation of resources such as social housing to be done 'transparently', in order to tackle accusations of unfairness and let people see how the system actually works.

Oh right, they need to tackle the "accusations" of unfairness......not actually do anything about what is happening and continuing to happen to this country.......just so that we are clear. 

The white working classes clearly need to be educated and reassured that their country is not being colonised, especially not colonised  at their expense. Throw them a few bones to keep them happy, and all will be tickety-boo.

They also highlighted the usefulness of street parties, festivals and places such as schools, pubs and shops when it comes to building better community links.

Oh....would that be the greatly celebrated British festivals like the ones Labour spent so much money on and then later wanted to hijack for their own perverse social engineering ends? 

Would that be the schools which are brimming with blacks and asians and foreign parents from around the globe? The pubs that are shut, turned into mosques or priced/taxed out of business? The shops that are either Asian owned corner shops, the "Pound-Lands" or boarded up shops that have shut due to high rental prices and the new out-of-town Tesco?

Or are these pontificating twits living in the Cotswold's, Harrogate, and Whitey-Upon-Sea? 

They said that any initiatives shouldn't just be aimed at white working class people, but rather communities as a whole, in order to deliver the best results.

Sorry Whitey.......I know we have been running ethnic orientated things for years, but now, now you are getting a bit restless, I think it is only fair that we continue to do this under the guise of it being for the "whole community" so that you feel included.

We could have offered some 'all white' funding, but you know, that is a bit racist and we would never live it down.

Findings by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation also revealed that officials often 'raised hopes' of residents during consultations about council houses but ultimately left them feeling 'let down.'

I know we used to give you white folk SOME hope of getting on the housing ladder, despite your number ticket slipping gradually down the table as your new Nigerians and Somali neighbours arrive endlessly......and we can clearly see that offering you such hopes (and 'kidding you' in order to massage away your resentment) is no longer working. 

Instead, to solve this sense of disenfranchisement, what we are going to do is offer you no hope at all.

That way, you will not be so disappointed when you see Jamaal  Mbubonga and Iftikah Hussein move in to the four bedroom dwelling down the road.

You could commiserate yourself by having a street party and welcoming them to the neighbourhood. That might make you feel a little bit better. We are here to help, after all.

Harris Beider, the author of the report, said: 'The way that people from working class white backgrounds are portrayed is often negative, which doesn't reflect the reality of the pride most hold in their community, nor their strong work ethic, and collective values.

'It is important to confound the negative stereotypes and understand that people in these communities feel their voices are not listened to, and that they have no stake in their community.

'They want to be valued, heard and connected to government.'

Chief-executive Julia Unwin CBE added: 'We know there are real concerns that many people in traditional white working-class areas are becoming increasingly disconnected with the political system and feel their views, experiences and interests are ignored by policy makers.

'This research highlights the real potential we have to grasp opportunities to engage with and support many of those who feel let down and '"last in line".'

In other words......

"We are currently papping our pants that society is getting restless and that a combination of issues are leaving a void that is fertile for the 'far right' and serious community violence in the 'down turn'. 

Therefore, we need to follow the advice of liberal sociologists and experts on the 'far right' potential (like Matthew Goodwin's recent Chatham House publication) and start massaging the white working class ego, and make them "feel" like their voices are listened to even though we really could not give a rats ass and have no intention of actually doing anything at all about their concerns in reality.


If we can fool them with this new 'muscular liberalism' approach for long enough, it might just keep them in the mainstream long enough for full transformation to occur without conflict.

They need to feel "connected" with the political system that has thus far sought to disembowel their country and strip them of their birthright - and that they are not being ignored or put 'last in line' - otherwise a new Mr Hitler could come along and undo all our hard work eradicating white civilisation from Britain.

Hmmn.  Cynical......moi?! Sûrement pas!... ...me siguri nuk!.... ....নিশ্চয় না!... ..当然不是!.. ...நிச்சயமாக இல்லை!...... .....kesinlikle değil !

Feeling Charitable?

One of the sad resultants of being "nationalistically inclined" is the lack of trust that I now have when it comes to charities of all stripes.

It is not all that long ago when I used to loathe people who did not contribute to charities. Now, I am the one who does not really give to any. 

The only exceptions I still have are; giving whatever loose change (up to a couple of pound) for the Royal British Legion in November for a poppy (or as they tend to say now, "The Legion").......and the 'forced' charity I am giving through government grants and in foreign aid programmes via my taxes. I am stupid enough to still be in a National Lottery syndicate at work too.

Even then, when it comes to buying a poppy, although I still like to pay some kind of homage to the dead of this nation for their sacrifice and trauma (despite my unease about the first and second word wars, the resultant from it, the case for it etc), I am getting reluctant to keep on doing this when it is increasingly the case that all conflicts we seem to have been involved with since the Falklands have continued to have been spurious, neo-conservative and in the interests of others, etc. 

It is getting like the old adage of "loathe the sin, love the sinner", where I would like to see my own people "done right by" and am thankful for their courage etc - but annoyed at the escapades they find themselves embroiled in and brainwashed into carrying out. Primarily though, I think of my grandfathers and the men and women of this country who made it what it was and who gave themselves, so they thought, to protect it.

When it comes to general charity, at an early age I was imbibed with the sense of doing good deeds for charity. This was to the usual point where I did things many children do......such as collecting for charities as part of my Sunday School youth, bringing tins (and such) to school for thanksgiving harvests, doing the whole comic relief thing and children in need thing, plus various others which came along through the years. 

I remember things at my secondary school, such as a missionary giving a "special talk" - somebody who had been helping 'poor Africans' in Tanzania. We schoolchildren then helped raise more money for Africa as a result.

I would not say I was ever some kind of charity giving guru. I did not bust a gut, but I subbed in my pocket money, did a few odd jobs to raise a bit of extra pocket money, contributed tins and packets of food, put money in various buckets for comic relief (buying the various red noses over the years), non-uniform day, and that kind of thing.

I remember thinking of the people who did not give anything as being "mean", "hateful" and "selfish". I hated them. "How can you not afford a little something for the starving babies in Africa", I thought. Once again, youthful liberalism made me put emotion before logic and understanding. I knew nothing of the world or how it worked.

Now, through what I have learnt about the world and the negative impact of such charities, such as how it makes (and has made) many problems worse, how demographics are going to end up, how various charities are nothing more than communist front organisations serving a globalist agenda, how charities are often working to undermine my own country and my own people.........it has made me one of those people I always used to hate as a child.

Now that I see ourselves in this global game, this national survival game, this self survival game of my race and my people, my tune has changed towards charities -even the ones which are supposedly British or "British themed" like Children In Need.

They now make it clear on the TV broadcasts that the money raised cannot be diverted to be used abroad and that it is all for use in the United Kingdom. It almost sounds patriotic doesn't it, tapping into the public who are fed up with our own poor and needy being sidelined and who subscribe to the 'charity begins at home' ethos .......but, quite honestly, do people really know where it is going, even in this country?

I know it makes me very hard hearted - but I have become determined to cease helping the funding of our own demise as a people in this kind of way. 

When, or if, we see a reversal in our national decline, I may well contribute to things once again. Until that point, I am going to remain sceptical, distrusting and - as the opposition would no doubt say - "hateful" and "bigoted".

If those are the labels which must be applied in order for me to try and resist our replacement as a people here in Britain and Europe, then so be it. I can live with myself. I have a clean conscience. We have been one of the most altruistic races on the planet and given much more to the world than we have ever received back.

If I was going to give to charity, I would do it on a local basis or towards something specific that I know for a fact is legitimate and beneficial to my own people in some way.

Much of the need for charity in this country is - in my opinion -somewhat self inflicted anyway, especially at the hands of mass migration and liberal social policies. 

We have seen increased poverty in society (via immigration, blacks, Asians), lack of stable parenthood (often black men leaving their children and increased divorce rates), drug abuse getting rife (at the hands of black and Asian drug pushers), myriads of "ethnic" themed charities for "integration" and "refugee awareness" programmes. None of which we ever really needed before c.1960.

So, when Children In Need rocks up every year - I am feeling less than charitable these days. It is all "feel good stuff" - but I cannot even bring myself to watch it on the television. The smug-fest gets irritating.

Yes, the bulk of it probably does go to some very needy children - probably truly British children who deserve help and support - but unfortunately, much of it does not and I cannot bear being made "a chump" out of via financing programmes and groups which are not in my peoples or my nations interests. I guess I am living proof of Robert Putnam's observations on 'social capital'.

I spotted elsewhere that somebody posted up a link to the Children in Need funding site, so I decided to read through the linked PDF documents which noted where the money was being allocated. 

I have taken the time and trouble of wading through the majority of them (not all of them) to pick out some of the most obvious examples of what I am talking about.

If you were pro-British and under an illusion that your charity money was going to little British children who had fallen on hard times etc, then you are probably in for a wake up call when I list some of the places it has gone to.

Whilst some of them may be 'deserving cases' for bleeding hearts and some tragic situations, unfortunately the rights of my people to survive in their own homeland have to come first. If we are to help them at all, it should be in their own homeland - not mine. Especially when our acts of 'kindness' are slowly turning this country into a basket case and hell hole.

For the sake of "charity", I have tried not to include ones for genuine disabilities and the disabled, even though some of those charities are obviously specifically targeted at their own ethnic people's advancement. 

Here we go, from what I gather was last years Children In Need:-

Lost in the Void - One British Nationalist....

It will probably come as no surprise to my regular readers (if there still are any!) when I state that I have been wondering what to do and wondering what has been going on recently within the various departures of 'nationalism' being carried forth by different organisations and different websites.

Nor will it come as any great surprise when I also say I have become increasingly fed up and disillusioned at how things are going and how I am currently not really happy with any manifestation of 'nationalism' being on offer. Hence my earlier quip about departures from Nationalism, because it is increasingly the case that it is no longer really reflecting what I got into it for (or where I would like it to head in the future).

In all truth, I have been having yet another self-reflection period as to what I really think about a lot of issues and (in the process) what I am going to do with myself, given that I am currently lost in a void from which I can only see a very small guiding shaft of sunlight at the end of the tunnel.

I have still attempted to keep up with my usual round of blog sites and news sites in recent weeks, but if the truth be told, I am becoming rather cold to some of them, or rather, in some cases, being left out in the cold. Within my despondency has also come an increasing lack of emotion or passion (even distaste at times) as I read them.

It is now only very rarely that I stumble across things which chime with me and which I feel are worthwhile to have read or feel I would like to point non-nationalists to - as examples of where I am coming from and what exemplifies our cause as I see it.

Whether it is they who are 'losing me' or me who is 'losing' them, I do not really know.

I now have nowhere to really go and hang my hat, and no method of going there other than my own way - which is seemingly in isolation to many other routes and what will probably comprise of a followship of one. Always a sad sign. 

However, I can only be true to myself, what fits my sense of right and wrong, my sense of a desired narrative and what seems true to the understanding and comprehensions that I have thus far learnt (and spent considerable time throughout the last decade thinking about).

Perhaps the only other option is to not tread any further at all, take my brain out of gear and put up with this onslaught of perpetual misery for the rest of my days. Or at least, for as long as I can bear it. I would not like to dwell on the latter aspect of that option too much though.

One regular site in particular has unfortunately been turning me off lately, with what I see as being a somewhat brash and belligerent tone towards all those people who are not yet prepared to claim allegiance to their new vehicle which they see as being the new salvation of this country.

By all accounts, it  may very well end up being such a thing, but at the moment is still something which I just cannot really "feel" within myself, get interested in or all that excited about. I am sorry, but that is just how it is. I cannot help it. I am cold to it.

Whether it is distrust, the vehicle itself, the way things are done, the concepts at play, the people behind it, I really do not know. I do not know what it is. Maybe all of the above, or none. As a result, I do feel a bit pushed out and unwelcome because I am not prepared to lend my unconditional support to the new king that has been crowned.

Various things have now been said and done too which have left the readership there in little doubt that from now on in, it was going to be 'their way or highway'. Unfortunately, I have had to choose the highway. I do not like being told what to think, what to believe, what to stand for, who to support or who to join. Nor do I suspect do others who have their own mind.

I may end up following them later myself, but that will need to be my own choice for the right reasons. 'Inaction' and the seeming "urgency" to be seen to be busy is not one of them. In my view, that is no reason to make a judgement.

It is perhaps more prudent to properly assess the future direction of nationalism and the country at large whilst we are in a lull, than dashing off to be 'busy' with projects and issues which may not lend themselves to taking us to where we need to be in the future. Inaction at this time is therefore not always necessarily a bad thing when it could potentially allow a right decision and pathway to be made.

However, of course, it is no use sitting there forever and just 'thinking' the problems away. If we are in a leaky boat and have to decide whether to 'bail out' the water that is swilling around the foot or try and stop the leak by taking moment to think critically about the situation, it is perhaps worthy having that decorum for a short while in order to try and save a lot of unnecessary work.

But at the end of the day, either the hole has to be plugged to stop the leak, or we need to get scooping that water out as best we can. The question is, whether the hole can be plugged at all and how long a period it is worth spending in order to find out. I have thus far been patient enough to wait.

It is just not in my nature to be hot-headed, impatient, rash, gung-ho or carried off on the crest of a wave. I cannot help it, I have always been that way, it is in my identity. Sometimes it has been a hindrance in my life when I have had to play catch up later, but at other times it has often served me well in the past. I do not know which way the current axe will fall this time, in future hindsight.

Of course, those people who want to flap around and busy themselves believe in the urgency of bailing out the water, so they seek to denounce and attack those they see as being sat around doing nothing. In fact, I think it is fair to say that Britain First and its supporters need to make everyone believe that this urgency is the case in order for their avenue to prosper and survive. After all, it is only natural and serves their purpose.

On that score, there seems to be a resurgence of the "circling of the wagons" atmosphere going on, cheap shots and slurs against other upstanding nationalists who really do not deserve the kind of abuse which is normally limited to thieves, liabilities, traitors and such; all designed to cause resentment and disenfranchisement of those other avenues in order to make more mileage for Britain First.

Perhaps it is partly because things have not gone as expected and that people feel let down. It has become resented. Understandable, but not particularly good behaviour.

Generally, it just seems to be push, push push push push of late. Angry outbursts, hard talk, etc.  Unfortunately, as I said earlier, I do not really like being pushed around and told what to support or not support. In fact it has made me dig my heels in, be even less receptive to Britain First and even more despondent as to where things are heading in general. 

I do not have any deep qualms or quibble with the site in question, the team there - or for that matter, Britain First. It is not how I operate and not where I am coming from here. I just need to explain, if only to myself, where I am with things right now and why I am unfortunately having to give one of my favourite sites a miss at the moment.

It is only part of my general malaise, not a primary cause. 

The wider issue with me is perhaps the way I am just not "seeing the vision" of the other parties and groups on offer. I am just not "feeling it" or comfortable with it. It is detached in some way from me, and I do not know how to build the bridge. It feels like the cause has splintered into three different camps, none of which I really call home.

I am currently not into Britain First, but neither am I really deeply into British Freedom, Cultural Nationalism, English Democrats, Real-politicking, UKIP, EDL, Geert Wilders PVV, BCG, Lawful Rebellion - or for that matter, National Front, BPP, EFP, and whoever else sits uncomfortably on the other side of the void.

I will not go into why this is the case with the former list, but it is not for the reasons many people might think. In fact, I am not going to be viciously hostile to any of the first group.

They are just doing things which I am not part of and going down routes which I do not feel at home with. If I cannot defend it to myself, then how can I defend it to wider circles of people? I have to believe in 'it' to actively get out there and do something.

On a wider level than that, I do not believe in, for example, the EDL/GoV fused British Freedom direction. I do not believe in realpolitking or English Democrats or believe that they or UKIP are in any way 'nationalists' who are playing a "clever game" of disguising their real outlooks or whatever.

When it comes to BCG and Lawful Rebellion, I have doubts and cynicism of what the movement will actually end up constructing in its wake - but again, I will leave that deep thought (perhaps over-thought) for another time. I have the exact same observation about Alex Jones, as it happens.

My 'general' support for the BCG and Lawful Rebellion does continue, but  the thing is, I still only tend to see them as being a piece of the jigsaw puzzle and something which is able to provide a particular segment of "understanding" and "counter culture" in our country - which is necessary to plant in our nation an alternative future to the one we currently see stretched before us by the established order.

What they are doing is interesting and could develop into being very important, much more than the recognition it has today on the fringes of 'far out' TV channels and conspiratorial based websites. There are aspects of it I am not too comfortable with though - and which I find  to be either odd, far fetched or too much to expect from the general public - but on the whole it has carved itself a niche.

However, I never saw it as synonymous with Nationalism or an alternative to it. It is not Nationalism, it is perhaps some kind of anti-establishmentarianist, quasi anarchic, libertarian movement which believes in the traditional civic state and statehood when it comes to organising the world stage. It is hard to pin down, but are they 'nationalists'? No, not really. Areas do overlap with Nationalism, often greatly, but it is not always the same fight as my own.

When we have to abandon aspects of our own fight and issues in order to complete a fight against what we are told is 'higher up the chain' (and get sidetracked off down various routes which are not our territory in the process) I cannot help but feel uneasy at where that may eventually lead people to. Perhaps only the deep thinkers will understand what I mean there.

Also, I had sought to use it in order to help our own fight on our own terms, but now it seems that the arrangement is at risk of being the other way around.

I do not believe that the EDL is the right thing for me, for reasons I have stated many times before. They are on a different page to where I am now coming from, so they do not speak for or represent my views on many issues. In fact, some argue that they are being played like a fiddle, and if they did not already exist they would have to be created to serve the purpose.

But of course it cannot be denied that they are an active segment of youth (and such) who are prepared to get out there and take control of the streets. They have indeed swamped the ability of the UAF and the usual suspects to claim control of the streets. I commend them for it in those ways. They too are building a counter-culture, in their own way.

Again, I am not hostile to them -  we do share some common ground, but at the same time, I am not really one of them and do not really identify my cause with them. It is not what I consider my home or identity. I doubt very much if I would ever go to an EDL march or announce to friends and family that they are representative of me (other than their shared ethnicity and opposition to Islamisation). 

It does not matter where I seem to look, or what various fractions of break off's are going down as their routes and methods, I just do not seem to sit right with any of them. I don't know what it is, I really don't. The only thing that still feels remotely like home in its directions and output is the BNPideas website/group.

But aside from policy and the traditional nationalism it offers me, I do not really know where that is going either. Although I wouldn't say I was 'frustrated' with it being so slow to come to the boil, I still have reservations of what can realistically be expected of it in the future anyway.

For the time being though it has my support and allegiance much more than I can offer other websites and blogs at the moment.

When it comes to the general "scene", I am getting ever more disappointed at how we cannot move up a notch when it comes to our methodology, approaches, discourse etc. 

Despite repeated calls for "change" by many people this year, the background noise remains (depressingly) just the same as it always has been. The support structure, the language, the style, the backstabbing, the back-biting, the discourse all remains the same but with the tail pinned to another donkey or two. 

The same people are still spending more time trolling the "reds" than they are winning over the public, the same sites are still frequented and still exist only serve to cater as distractions for that end. The same sour and bitter/nasty ranting and raving occurs, as does the rumour mills and the insular outlook of our little pond.

When we say we need to radically overhaul the movement and pull it up by its bootstraps to be fit for purpose, I personally think it means that all those things have to be looked at too - otherwise we will remain just the same, just as fringe, just as insulated, repeating the same mistakes all over again.

I find language, approach and discourse highly important for this reason. It is perhaps a pet quirk of mine amongst many others. The kind of material that emanates from certain sites and certain comments at times is hardly productive to furthering the cause and increasing the readership and fellowship of Nationalism either. That is just my own view, of course.

If we wish to build ourselves a following and gain ourselves understanding and acceptability, it is not always so wise to be that blunt and extreme in our discourse, or for that matter, approach things in the way that we tend to do. 

It does not mean that we have to water down what we stand for or believe, but that it may be prudent to express it in a different way. I do not mean "politically correct", not at all - but I do not mean jabbing sticks into peoples eyes either, whether it be descriptions of people or things, or going on about 'shadowy elites' etc.

When it comes to some of the comments on a whole host of prominent websites, well, some of that material warrants a critical minded article all of its own! 

Whether it is "arab scum" who apparently deserve be "nuked from the face of the earth" by their neighbours or "buried in pigs excrement" - or whether it is endless copy and paste links to Jews, things sailing close to holocaust revisionism and "truther" sites-  or whether it is barking mad women who are talking out the "missing 6 billion people from Earth" (who apparently must secretly live underground the Earth's surface)  or the discovery of "Hidden Bibles" or whatever else, is hardly the kind of discourse and image which we need to be presenting to the public.

I am sorry to be so harsh, some of these people may very well be nice and supportive, but for goodness sake, some of the crack-pottery is off the chart at times and a far cry from what we ought to be surrounding ourselves with if we aim to have success.

At least (on the whole) BNPideas is getting it right and remembering our purpose. When it comes to presenting the cause, the policies, the rationale, the kind of debate which might change the public's mind and get them thinking on our side, I think it is of high calibre.  In my opinion, for those purposes and the platform we seek, it is one of the best offerings on British Nationalism out there.

It seems solid, it seems built on good foundations, with many of the writers and contributing members being able to run rings around the ideologically weak when it comes to what has long defined nationalism and understanding just where the policies are formulated from and why, whether it be food, energy, morality matters or ethnicity.

The way I see it, they are trying to be cleaner cut, orderly, explanatory, exemplary in their conduct and trying to uphold in themselves what they seek to expect of all of us as a movement. I have to say I value that, and I value it perhaps more than I do other sites which sometime forget our purpose of recruitment at times.

But, yes, like everything else, they too have flaws and criticism is due against them on some fronts. Things within the party (or dual party or whatever it is at the moment), all the dancing around the internal politics of the British National Party, also some articles are naive at times (for example, one about conspiracies). On the whole, it is much more my kettle of fish though.

Many of us are disappointed about what has happened, many of us are disillusioned and have been treading water since the collapse of Barking and Dagenham etc in the elections and watching in disbelief at the whole sorry saga that has been happening ever since. This treading water is/was even the case with Britain First to some degree, whilst it sets itself up and establishes its concepts.

When it comes to some sort of contest for 'which organisation sets up first', I can only suggest that it is not necessarily the first horse out of the traps that ends up winning the race. Time will tell I suppose, but whatever happens, I hope that we can all work together than spending time working apart and working against each other. We need to co-ordinate each others efforts, not spend all our time and effort undermining and limiting one another.

The BNPideas vehicle does look to be stuck in a  low gear, but let us be honest with ourselves, we have never really had a seriously credible Nationalist party or movement  in Britain in over 50 years. A few months, or even a year, is not a long time to wait for one to be formulated from the wealth of experience and knowledge we have, especially if it meant not splitting up the existing following.

Many of us longed and hoped for Andrew to stand as the bridgehead of the party or a new party - and thus be there as the more polished and better presentable mascot for British Nationalism.

Many of us wanted less scuffles and pub brawl politics (and all that old garbage that tended to go on with the BNP), and we wanted more of an Andrew Brons, Andrew Moffat, Vlaams Belang/Front Nationale, LePen, meets UKIP style party which was fitting of modern political discourse and something edgy and radical like Marine LePen currently pulls off for France. 

Pigs in Skips, people pretending to be soldiers in our street campaign activities, telling the media that you want to sink asylum seekers boats etc, local councillors joking about "drowning pakis" in the floods, replica gun toting morons, pornographers, fraudsters and things like having former members of staff threatening to kill your party leader (!) are hardly the kind of calibre we are looking for.

It has been a dead weight for decades. We were aching to move on from all this nonsense.

It was the logical choice to "up our game" and move into a new era, in my opinion. Out with the silly antics, out with the boneheads, wierdo's and relics of confrontational street politics - and in with the suited, articulate, well thought out political positioning as can currently be seen by Marine Le Pen.

However, of course, we first had to come that push and the collapse that could sweep this old scene aside.

We knew that within a space of months; court cases were looming, there were investigations into finance, more cases looming for ex-staff who were sacked without due procedure being followed, the debt was mounting up, bailiffs were at Nick Griffin's house, Adam Walker was ordered to pay thousands to the courts, Simon Darby was also in trouble.

We had the 9 vote loss on the leadership election, splitting the party down the middle - and we were due the Panorama programme - something which we had all thought was going to be the thing which would fully shake British National Party leadership (or the entire party) to the ground and usher in a new era, either with new people at the top or a new thing altogether without them involved.

The situation, therefore seemed untenable, as though the culmination of all those things were going to force the hand of fate for the party. Andrew Brons and his cautious avoidance of  the risk of fracturing the BNP following (like what happened with the National Front) looked as though it was going to pay off. It still might, who knows. I am prepared to wait a little longer, but even I have my limits.

Let us not forget that both Britain First and BNPideas were embryonic and developing separately at the same time as each other during this time period. The former was initially a totally different ball game, something which was not really in 'competition' with existing parties or movements.

The idea of there being a "Britain First" campaign group did not bother me in the slightest whilst this  BNPideas plan was being devised. This is because I thought they could be an independent addition to politics that could benefit all nationalist parties if they recruited their services or coordinated their issues locally. This is perhaps what 'working together' would/could really have entailed.

That has now changed, and so has the speed at which we expected the existing British National Party to topple. Quite unbelievably, to me anyway, none of this list of catastrophes has really happened to the severity we had suspected they would - so far.

The Panorama programme was particularly weak and pathetic, giving rise to the suspicion that they would prefer the British National Party to remain in the little league, with Nick Griffin and Clive Jefferson etc to remain in place and remain divisive and hamstringing the movement.

It seemed to me that their new tactic was going to be to demoralise the supporter base and try and fracture it on mistrust, distaste and monetary grounds. Seems to be working a treat so far.

It was clear that their previous establishment attempts to wipe the party out with "ethnic membership" or to try and quell the rising support sentiment in the public (as now witnessed in many newspaper comments) was not going to work, so chaos and mistrust over finances is the other tried and tested method of keeping people in the mainstream - and thus keeping them at arms length from what we really have to say and offer as an alternative.

If it had meant handing the party over to some wet 'nationalist' (or wet behind the ears one) or some crank type I would have been disappointed. However, throughout the reform stage and such, we coerced Andrew Brons to take the mantle from Richard Edmonds. Andrew did not really want the role, quite understandably. 

The thing was, Andrew Brons was a key member who was liked by all sides, or at least recognised as a professional and good ambassador for the cause. He was known to the wider public, if only for his few TV appearances on Big Questions, Sky News, BBC and of course the MEP position he had won in Yorkshire. 

Many more of us into Nationalism know much more about who he is and what he is like, what he stands for and how he likes to go about things. I had always been impressed, and I am not impressed very easily.

That is why I found it rather disgraceful to see this man be mocked, ridiculed, smeared and insinuated against last weekend on a particular site. Very poor behaviour, I thought. 

But that leads us back to being in the same old bind and same old quagmire of nationalism.

Which leads me to ask myself - what exactly is the alternative to how we are generally going about things? And how should we be selling it?

I increasingly feel that we are going about it the wrong way. We are trapped into the compartment we have put ourselves into (and have been allocated by our opponents) and thus seem unable to think any differently or come out with things at any new angle or direction. I have been giving some thought to this lately.

It sounds simple, but we need to remember what our assets are. I think we need to remember our roots as an ideology and a movement and where we truly sit on the spectrum of political discourse. We are really missing out on a lot of good opportunities. 

This means, in my view, turning the tables on what lines we often take with stories and various issues and taking them around that 180 degrees, directly on our opponents turf. Ultimately, hoisting them by their own petard, using their own techniques, and claiming the moral/righteous high ground. (Possibly at the same time as other issues happen on the streets and elsewhere lend credence to our positions and our grounding).

Although I am a British Nationalist, I have to admit in the last 6 months and at the immediate moment, my influences are coming more from the Occidental Observer, Amren, Altright, NPI, Front National etc than Gates of Vienna, Brussels Journal, campaign groups, EDL, BCG or whoever else.

A recent Altright article I liked, for example, was this one: http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/untimely-observations/the-new-right-and-what-it-can-offer-the-rest-of-the-world/  because it was something different and possibly worthy of further thought and action as to how we build up a future direction as a 'whole'.

Influential people in my world at the moment are Alex Kurtagic, Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor and paleoconservatives like on Vdare and like Pat Buchannan. 

Alex Kurtagic, I have to say, has been highly influential to me of late. I think that he has quite a fresh and dynamic approach to things and as such he does comes at it from another angle (not necessarily the exact same one I envisage though).

Only this weekend, did I listen to his interview with Richard Spencer on AltRight Radio - and again, I am glad I did. http://www.alternativeright.com/altright-radio/ . (The RamzPaul one there is rather amusing too).

I think we need these radical (as in, different) thinkers (within nationalism) to shake things up from time to time - or to tell us some home truths about where we are going wrong or how we might do better. At least they are positive and putting suggestions forward and not just slagging everything off and saying that everything, all the time, has no point.

I need to give much more thought as to what I am trying to envisage for the cause and how it will shape my future directions. I hope that whatever happens (with all these scenarios and branches of thought) we can work something out as a whole.

As usual for me, I do not know how long I will be sticking around though. 

During my current void, I have felt the need to continue getting my personal "house" in order, my nationalist related affairs tidied up, my back catalogue of collections issued somewhere for other people to use, perhaps a few documentaries made/finished. 

That's why I have been quiet here lately. I have started one of my projects, and bloody hell, it is a right chore having to wade through and compile it! I could do with 100 volunteers all doing 1000 pieces each - lol.

However, I feel that I need to do this 'finalising' for the sake of personal clarity/tidiness and, admittedly, for the sake of potentially "packing-it-in" and moving on with the rest of my life. 

This time next month I may feel very differently about a lot of things though. Who knows?!......

Liberal Lunatics

It is fair to say that I have been very quiet lately and I have not been keeping up with creating new blog articles. However, I must admit I do wonder if anyone actually reads them anyway - and I unfortunately appear to have lost two or three followers since my last entry.

The reason for the quiet spell has been a combination of disenfranchisement with what is starting to manifest itself as nationalist 'discourse', the general state of affairs within the movement (and the national state of affairs), plus I have been busy with a particular project which has been on the back-burner for several years.

However, during the process of compiling a particular part of this project last night, I thought I would  break my silence and get a momentary grumble off my chest. After all, what else is a blog for?!

This grumble is concerning the loathing which I have come to have for the kind of white, liberal, morons who not only actively celebrate our extinction and extermination - but actively work and support the onslaught by programmes, books, training, social engineering, mind manipulation, propaganda and so on and so forth.

Although it is not exactly hard to find such people in contemporary Britain, some people in particular are perhaps more nauseating than others for their warped mindset, especially considering when they are let loose upon shaping the minds of toddlers and infants. 

I would like to say that these people are mentally ill, however, I do try and refrain from such language because although in many ways I would find it convenient, I would not really want to lock people away as being insane just for their differing viewpoints to mine. So I will not say she is mentally ill - just extremely twisted in a way which is polar opposite to my own positions.

As an advocate of white survival, nationalism, paleoconservatism, etc, I will just say instead that I find some of these people extremely dangerous. They are dangerous not because of violence, but through doctrine and intent of that doctrine they emit.

This is because they are actively engaged in encouraging the biggest (albeit 'soft') genocide in world history, because they are utterly nihilistic in their actions and beliefs, and because they claim to do it under the disguise of "doing good" for the world.

Perhaps some of them are "useful idiots" who do not understand just how evil and disgusting they are  being. Who knows. Yet if they do know what they are doing, what the conclusions will be, still actively support white genocide nationally and worldwide, I cannot help but see them as sinister people. People who are hell bent on the extremes of globalism and the mocha- coloured racial melting pot world of uniformity and world governance. 

Sifting through my archives at Activism Towers, a particular woman's name has cropped up more than once or twice in the last four days. This woman is Anne O'Connor.

A quick internet search - taking literally five minutes - came up with some of her details. Not that I intend to harass or distress Anne as a sole perpetrator, or particularly pernicious perpetrator -  but I hold her up as one example of the kind of person who typifies the attitude we are up against when it comes to our polar opposites. 

So, who is Anne O'Connor? Most of you will know her name from a relatively recent article in the Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8786641/Dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says.html) - which exposed the insanity of this woman quite clearly for all to see.

From the outlines of her approaches, it seems to me like she has been reading too many American 'diversity training' books and has sought to create a niche for herself here by pushing the same kind of agendas and discourse into the public arena.

If you have forgotten its contents (or do not know of the above Telegraph article) please re-read it, if only to help you remember the full glory of this woman's attempts to turn society on its head and manipulate children's minds.

Naturally, the reaction this newspaper article received (on the whole) was the one of 'eye rolling' , laughter, moaning and groaning about "political correctness gone mad!".

However, it is no laughing matter and is not something which we should be letting pass with just a tut and a moan. I believe that people pushing this agenda are dangerous and a threat to our survival. I think what she is doing is extremely dangerous in those terms.

Anne O'Connor is an example of what permeates society in the background - perhaps in YOUR child's nursery - which slowly and surely ushers in a cultural and societal discourse designed to wipe us out.