Ceremonial Sacrifice

"When are you indigenous people going to have a piece of paper to say you are British, like us?"

It is a bit of a shame about Frank Field and his remarks in the newspapers today, which suggest that the 'white working classes' (and no doubt the rest of the indigenous/white hosting society) should also take up Citizenship Ceremonies in order to re-establish themselves a sense of identity in their own country. 

Perhaps he was being pithy and issuing a 'soundbite' to raise an issue, but perhaps he really meant it. 

I guess that is how bad it is getting. A nation so pumped full of foreigners and different hues, so detached from it's own sense of history and identity, so confused and dazed about what the hell has happened to the place since the second world war, that we need to be told who we are (and who we are supposed to be) in this new nation they still seem to call Britain.

To be fair, it was only a small comment and observation by Frank which seemed to grab the attention of the media. Stories have appeared in the Daily Mail, Birmingham Mail, Independent, Telegraph and elsewhere - all of which seemed to run with this thought.

(This is despite there being a whole conference given to journalists and others on subjects relating to the issues arising from this country which the talking heads and elites have thus far unnaturally manufactured for us).

Still, I am quite disappointed that Frank was entertaining these ideals - and the kinds of organisations who helped organise the event he spoke at. 

A recent set of arguments I made

The reason for this article is to share a recent comment battle about our plight. Well, I say it was a battle - but I suppose you can only have a real battle when you get properly challenged and engaged by people who can counter-act your points and questions!

In this particular case, none of my questions or points were actually answered. Instead, I received a dialogue back of how they wanted things to be instead - and how generally vile and nasty I am for holding my views and positions. No surprise there, then.

That may well be their view, but why not show me to be wrong and not valid in what I say? It was made out that I was a 'moron' and too stupid to understand complexities, etc. Well if I am a moron and too stupid to understand things, then it should not have been so hard for them to actually answer my questions and discuss the points I was raising, should it?

At one point I was even told to "go jump in a lake" - which has to be the most babyish comment back to me I have ever received on what is supposed to be an articulate and intellectual discussion blog. For I was not arguing on some student room forum or 'cut and thrust' political site.

I guess that some people cannot handle another persons point of view in a rational way, so they reach for the name-calling and stereotypes instead.The usual screams that I was a "Nazi" and part of the "White Supremacist Brigade" were present, plus some other weird opinions and fabrications that are part of a manufactured stereotype image of anybody who is white and racially conscious.

Without rewriting the whole article and the context of it, in a nut shell, it was relating to the racial disparity when it comes to voting in America - and the suggestion that 'whites' may have to start looking out for their own interests too.

(The commentators I challenged did not really address the deeper nature and implications of main article either, they were more interested in sweeping the issue away and talking about how it is not tactical or practical to get into 'all that kind of stuff').

I will copy what I wrote here, and interject the nature of their responses here so as to make sense of my own replies. 

'Staying on a clear, direct message' - by Michael Kennedy

This is an interesting article from Australia, which I have copied and pasted here. I hope the author does not mind, but I thought it deserved a wider readership as food for thought.

Whilst I still tend to think it is hard to fight this battle on explicit terms, I think it will resonate with those of us who are true racial nationalists and appeal to our own beliefs and desires for what needs to come along.

How feasible and wise it would be to undertake such a direct line (given our largely brainwashed society) is open for debate, but I thought it was a good read regardless of this and that it makes some good points which are worthy of consideration.

Alex Kurtagic's speech at Identitär Idé 4 (Identitarian Ideas)

Alex Kurtagic speaking at Identitär Idé 4 (Identitarian Ideas) Stockholm, 28 July 2012:

Collapse Scenarios in the West and their Implications.

Leo Mckinstry - Tories fail to solve immigration crisis that blights Britain

This is a republication of an opinion piece by Leo McKinstry in the Daily Express this week. Some of you will have already seen it, but I am adding it here all the same, because I think it is worthy of being pulled out from the daily "churnalism" and copied elsewhere before it gets washed away with all the rest.

I do not make a habit of republishing articles from newspapers on this site, but in this case I will make an exception. I have always tended to like Leo's opinion pieces on the matters of our national identity and on matters such as the creeping state interference in all our lives, and this one is rather good - and probably as close as you could expect a 'mainstream' newspaper to get away with publishing in these shrieking times we live in. 

Some may well say that it is just another case of media manipulation and that it is all designed this way - but even if all that is the case and it is some kind of safety valve, I still think it is quite good and would have been generally useful for regular Express readers to mull over. 

If it is taken on face value as a genuine and honest piece, I think Leo is quite brave and worthy of some thanks and respect for sticking to his viewpoints and telling it like it is. Although it could always go further, we have to remember that it is a journalist in all the modern trappings of the mainstream media. 

It makes a point, is in the public domain on newspaper stands, and is generally well written. So without further ado, here it is:

Dr Frank Ellis - Liberal Totalitarianism - Re-mastered

The Rise of New-Variant Liberal Totalitarianism and the War against England

This is a re-worked version of the recent talk given by Dr Ellis at the Traditional Britain Group's Enoch Powell Centenary dinner. 

Whilst many people will already have come across this work, I offer out this improved copy of the footage for general consumption in the public domain. 

I have (painstakingly) spent numerous hours in attempts to clean up the flaws in the original video, through various time consuming methods of technical tinkering with both the audio and visual aspects.

Whilst it is not possible to make a silk purse out of a sows ear - and nor am I a sound or video engineer - I think it is a great improvement on the original copy, especially for the second half, which looked and sounded to have been captured on an i-phone rather than a camcorder!

Whilst I am thankful for the original footage (and I can appreciate that 'things happen' when out at live events) I still hope that more care is taken in the future to provide not only more spacious speaking corners where the speaker is not at risk of clanging into the surroundings, but applying better scene settings and back ups for completing a higher quality video recording. 

Audience retention is hard to keep at the best of times, let alone when it is hardly viewable or able to be heard. The first half was quite good quality, but the second was a bit of a disaster and likely to lose a lot of viewers. 

Seeing as these kinds of videos are potentially very important for getting a premise over to a wider audience, I thought it was worth the time to see if I could help make it more watch-able.

The speech given on the original video does not go into the same lengths of detail as the written script which was being delivered on the night, although most of the essentials are present.

For the full speech contents and more, see http://drfrankellis.blogspot.co.uk/ . 

After the latest election collapse - A fresh start or reverse gear?

Oi! You!!!, Traitor! Marxist Scum! Genocidist! Zionist! Homo! Paedo!

I am just as disheartened and pessimistic as any other nationalist when it comes to the state of nationalism, the recent election results, the attitudes of the greater public and the ever pressing feat we have to accomplish if things are ever going to even slow down, never mind be reversed.

With this demoralisation we all have, often comes despair. With despair often comes anger and frustration. With anger and frustration often comes a retreat to old ways and old methods. 

Like a designer who has reluctantly been forced to learn how to use a computer to design things (instead of a pad and pencil), when he is placed under pressure, when he is frustrated at a lack of progress because he cannot do it as quickly yet (but in the future would be ten times as productive), when things are going wrong and mistakes are made, the tendency is there to say "balls to this computer stuff!" and start scribbling on the pad of paper again in order to get things moving.

Unfortunately, this fall back to old ways cannot go on forever. Unless new ways are devised, learnt and practised, our competitors will end up working faster, smarter, more efficiently, more cost effectively and our business or organisation gets to the point where it just cannot compete as a going concern and has to close down. 

Nationalism is a company of ideas and standpoints rather than material goods or services. We cannot afford to let our ideas and concepts become bankrupt. We need to improve, expand, take on staff, invest our time and money - but if we keep undercutting ourselves to scrape by and make do and mend, the steeper the curve of losses we will see in the long run. Like the old saying "penny wise, pound foolish".

We were perhaps at the moment of nearly breaking through with the training, but we have since been put under huge pressure internally and externally, and, in the process of things going badly wrong, people are now scrambling to return to the 'old days' and 'old ways' to try and get the job done again.

In nationalism there is no doubt a rather justified attitude just lately that all is lost - so "why care what we say or how we say it?", or a general suggestion of a return to styles and approaches that have historically got us nowhere - such as 'street marches', "extreme right" uniforms and venomous (read: alienating) discourse that is far removed from those we need to win over. 

I agree that we should not - ever - water down too much of what we stand for. I hope this website is a testament to that, as I have tirelessly maintained that we should keep all our targets intact, never wash ourselves away, stand up for our ethnic rights, stand up for our interests and never allow our traditional nationalism to be subverted by self styled 'modernisers' who appeal to 'real politicking'. 

I still believe that. We need to be quite radical, unique, different, rebellious, notable - not follow the rest blindly in the false hope we can be the same as the rest and then sweep to victory. Do we believe in what we stand for or not? If we do, then we need to sell it - not hide from it or help undermine it for short term expediency.

However, what I still differ upon with regard the approach models of some nationalists, is that one does not need to be blunt, or angry, or venomous, crude, confrontational, etc to keep to those principles and values and fight for our causes.

The focus for me is therefore much more upon 'selling it' if we are going to 'keep it true' to course.

How do we do that? That is what I think we have to ask ourselves and try to improve upon.

Some Refutations 2

I recently thought I would test the water by throwing my hat into the 'mainstream' newspaper debating ring once again. 

I have not bothered for quite a long time, especially on some particular papers where there is heavy moderation and a near 'mission impossible' situation to ever get it through the moderator filters. (Some have not - as of yet  - made it).

Just for the sake of it, I thought I would share them here in case anybody would ever find them useful or a starting point for their own battles. 

The site had a reply limit of 500 words......which, of course, I struggled to squeeze my replies into! In fact, whilst it only took me 15 to 20 minutes to construct the contents of what I wanted to say as a reply, it then took me about an hour and a quarter to squash them down to the 500 limit!

I deeply suspect that nobody tends to read this site because their jaw drops in fear at the pile of text scrolled before their eyes. (Eg, the recent five-parter has had virtually no views at all - so I might have to re-package it to something smaller).

Anyway, without further waffle, here's how it went so far:

(Some names have been removed to protect the innocent!)

Jonathan Bowden

I am sure we have all heard the sad news by now - and I have certainly expressed my praise for the man on various sites and comment sections, so I will not do yet another one here.

However, I did see a pretty good and often humorous article by Alex Kurtagic today, recalling his encounters with Jonathan. It is on the steadily excellent altright website, and can be found via the following link:

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/exit-strategies/the-death-of-jonathan-bowden/

Regards, B.A.

Something 'down to Earth' which I think nationalist parties should be talking about

By pure chance, I stumbled over a series of articles in the Daily Mail regarding the sell off of British companies and sectors. They are there to inform and to promote a new book by the author of the articles.

I think they are worth reading because - unless I am going completely bonkers - this is the kind of thing which once used to be nationalist territory and something we used to stand for as part of our whole message and political standpoint. 

I have not seen any mention of these articles on my regular (albeit) small network of Nationalist sites, and I do wonder why not.